Came across this dirt cheap secondhand on a charity shelf and was duly intrigued. Totally missed the fact that it is 'Young Adult' -- the category not having the same profile back in 1992, perhaps. But even with a teenage protagonist it wasn't immediately obvious as such for a good many pages. More striking is its originality, with very economic, effective prose, and the lack of specific detail which gives it a mythic, metaphorical or allegorical feel. The dust jacket proclaimed it a 'challenging novel', and by the end of the 184 pp., it certainly eluded any simple 'aha' as to what Kelleher was aiming at.
But maybe it's my knowledge that's lacking. The title is a reference to the complex poem 'Childe Roland to the Dark Tower came', by Robert Browning, picking up on a line from Shakespeare, which in turn references the Song of Roland, one of Charlemagne's paladins, dating from the mediaeval period. The said teen protagonist 'Tom', proves some way into the book to be 'Tom Roland', so it's not just just a tangential reference. It's possible that English Lit lecturer Kelleher was doing a teen-accessible version of a classic, or more probably I suspect, doing something frightfully literary that only the cognoscenti will get.
Structurally, its chapters alternate between Tom's waking and parallel dreaming existence (the latter, the entire chapters of which are given in italics, eventually being identified as 'The Dream'). If not utterly original, this is still an engaging format, and nicely done. And just one reference to 'dreams within dreams' invites you to question whether the pointedly generic earlyish 20th centuryish industrial setting for the 'waking' world isn't actually a dream -- or nightmare -- itself...
What I think IS original -- and which presumably makes or breaks the book for most people, and for commercial interest -- is the twist. I ticked the box for SPOILERS, and here we go: Tom seems to be on a mission for sweetness and light as The Carrier, of the angelic infant identified as The Sleeper (though there's no suggestion of baby Jesus Christian allegory to this, even when you're alert for it), and then at the end he has to foil his own quest because he realises The Sleeper is in fact not a saviour but a sweet deceiver that is actually a demonic force. Though doubts do occur to Tom at a couple of points in the last quarter of the story, a tale in which you learn in the last ten pages that everything you were previously rooting for was a big lie is not going to sit well with conventional audiences. I get a hint of solipsist philosophy and the Cathar / Manichaean / Gnostic worldview here, and in the dreams within dreams concept, but don't have the knowledge to be able to put my finger on anything more definite than that.