What do you think?
Rate this book


110 pages, Paperback
First published February 28, 2006
Walter’s not coming. That would be fine with us if only our parents didn’t live in expectation of him. They constantly hope that he might just show up, that when we get together at their place again, the whole family might just be there, all of us, as if we did in fact belong together, as if we were a whole, one more time, or for the first time rather, because it hasn’t happened yet, not once.We never learn why Walter, Uncle Walter, is the focal point of the narrator’s parents’ world. But one of them is always at home in case he turns up. Sometimes he’s expected, for one of the regular family celebrations (which now always have to take place at the narrator’s parents’ home), or then again he might just drop in unexpectedly. Either way the house is always kept in readiness for him:
Walter can’t bear the sun. Too much light isn’t good for him, and draughts make him ill. So the windows and doors are all kept shut, since Walter mustn’t become ill. In summer, we wait in the sun or in the shade, and in cold weather we wait indoors. The house is not heated. The warmth isn’t good for Walter, so in winter we sit chilled in the rooms, looking at each other but with Walter on our minds.Sometimes Walter’s wife turns up:
Walter will follow, she says then. She has come ahead of him because he was held up by someone at the last moment. We wait, and while waiting she becomes restless and worried, as do we and our parents. Something must have happened or he would be here, she says. She stays a while longer, then leaves. We stay behind, waiting for her call, for a sign. But there is none, ever, as if there really were no Walter, not for us.Would it spoil the ending if I told you Walter never comes? Well he might have; they say we just missed him but did we really? And what’s worse we’re left without any answers as to why he stopped coming or if he ever intends to come again. And we know as we’re reading this that we’re not going to get any answers because none of the stories leading up to this have provided any answers so why should this one? And yet we keep reading. Just in case. And we read the next one and the next one just in case any of them explain themselves but none of them do and despite the quality of the writing—every story is constructed out of beautifully-designed sentences—I was a little glad this book was as short as it was because by the end I was screaming for something resembling closure although to be fair ‘Morning, Noon and Night’ does provide something resembling an explanation at the end and although ‘Encounter’ doesn’t provide any answers at least it does come to an end.
For hours they didn’t move, not even to wave away the mosquitoes or scratch themselves. Every day, every night, always the same. Their stillness made me feel uneasy, and my unease grew until it festered into an affliction I could no longer bear.As with Uncle Walter we’re kept in ignorance about this couple but this doesn’t stop the narrator’s imagination going wild. As does ours. Maybe not so much in this story because the narrator is our proxy but in later stories we are him, watching, wondering what Hotschnig’s up to. Why are his characters doing so little? Why does he insist on describing things in such minute detail but skimps on the basic facts?
She stroked Karl's head and looked me in the eye and placed the child's finger in her mouth, kissing it tenderly for a long time and sucking on it. She slavered over the little hand, and pulled it back out of her mouth where the fingers had begun to dissolve.In his review in The Guardian Nicholas Lezard writes that it’s “very refreshing to be confronted by stories which so firmly refuse to yield to conventional interpretation, or even comprehension.” In layman’s terms then: Don’t expect to get these. So why read them? In this respect I found myself thinking of Beckett’s play Not I. Objective meaning does seem to have been of secondary consideration in the writing style. As Beckett indicated to Jessica Tandy he hoped that the piece would "work on the nerves of the audience, not its intellect" and if there’s a single word I would use to describe the nine stories in Hotschnig’s collection it would be ‘unnerving’. Lezard chooses another word: Unheimliche, the Freudian concept of an instance where something can be both familiar yet alien at the same time, resulting in a feeling of it being uncomfortably strange. That fits too. Some might also say that that’s what Kafkaesque means. It’s as good a fit as any.