What do you think?
Rate this book


295 pages, Paperback
Published May 30, 2005
The sensual photograph on the cover page did make me frown- were the stories detailed?How so? And any censoring? But to the review now!!
Mademoiselle Pearl is written in first person, perches upon a family dinner, and brings out a long-dead romance between two persons of the household. The narrator is a mere vehicle, invoking lovelorn tears from his host, M. Chantal, and a similar lovelorn faint from Mme. Pearl, the housemaid. Filled with taut, appealing observations and a highly original way of looking at things, this was the quintessentially marvellous short story. Its ending especially had me in raptures:Balzac. They say he's the Dickens of France, and no false thing, that. Surely, his style is very reminiscent of the latter, but...only one of the stories here was amusing. The Merry Jests of King Louise the Eleventh is written in a witty, boisterous way- quite the way the king in question was like- no doubt of that. From executing the wrong man purposely, to propping a sad virgin woman's bed with a handsome naked corpse- this tale made me literally delighted for reading it- how can I convey that joy, that...bliss from this purely masterful narrative?...and written in so..lively a manner too! But the joy ends here, I'm afraid. The next two tales were boring tales of murder and lust- not painted with the gilded Balzacian language.
Victor Hugo. Never had many expectations from him, but was nonetheless excited to read him. Turns out, only one of his tales, Claude Gueux, clicked for me. But oh how it struck me! A poor man turns thief, gets hauled to the prisons, but suffers from further alienation, commits murder, and deserves the guillotine for it.
Clearly written, with straightforward depictions of justice and injustice- and yet it enthralled me, led on to murder, and I could not move away from it! If this is the stuff that Hugo furnished his grand Les Miserables with, I'm all for going and grabbing my favourite copy. Simple but powerful, passionate and moving- this is the stuff of impactful fiction.
(Words exceeded!) Next up:- Anatole France. I confess, plainly, that this was not an author I'd ever heard of; but this was the writer whose style I most loved. Putois is genius, engaging, sly, and perfect- all rolled into one. It's about an imaginary gardener whose existence changes the life of a town. Marguerite, written in a form of diary entries, puts together highly poetic images of love and despair, materialism and life as a bliss to others; that is, the joy of living for others as well. I was especially dipped into that tale. The next story is similarly placed, with similar themes, except that it uses the cliched trope of a fooled narrator- but nonetheless very exciting. I think it was because of his modernistic ability to draw the readers in better than any other contemporary French writer, that won him the Nobel Prize. Which, by the way, I did not know earlier.
I'm certain that Anatole France was, for me, the best of these storytellers; no matches for him. The others, like Hugo and Louys and Maupassant too, I'll keep referring to, later on. One thing common for the first three writers' stories was that their first tales were really great, but the subsequent were not upto the mark. Not, at least, as good as the first ones.
Well! The range of this collection is vast and demonstrative- I cannot deny that- but the book itself- why, full of piracy and blank margins and sometimes even misspells! (Sighs). Yet I won't rant after such a nice experience. It's like taking bitter pills after a warm, cheesy pizza. I'm definitely stimulated to explore these authors in more depth. And, you can be guaranteed, I did not return the book to the library, and it is still with me!