Too Reminiscent of Contemporary Romance
I've read and adored historical romance for decades, and I'm disappointed by the recent trends I've seen. While tropes have always been the mainstay of genre romance, contemporary romance—especially now—is very trope heavy, with tropes even listed in book subtitles. Because I know some writers and publishers, I know there are several genre fiction courses out there teaching would-be authors and publishers how to figure out best-selling tropes and perhaps even find ghostwriters to author stories filled with popular tropes. For a long time, in comparison, historical romance has not bowed to the will of the trope-loving masses, though historical romance does have its own particular tropes. So, I found it a little disturbing both at the book review site where I got this book from and within its pages that this particular story is exceedingly trope heavy, but not with typical historical tropes. Instead, its central tropes seem to be ones popular in contemporary romance, namely forced proximity, brother's best friend (actually, they were all friends as children), off-limits (and this phrase is even used in the book several times!), and even road trip—which the author actually tagged the book at the book review site for a story that takes place at sea! Although this takes place in the pre-Regency years (1806), the heroine is shockingly modern—another trend I don't like a historical romance; if you want to write a heroine with modern sensibilities, write a contemporary romance! As I read somewhere, people don't change radically in a short period of time. Instead, slow evolution happens, say, between the early 1800s and now. Even a progressive person back then would not appear to be progressive to us, as they are multiple steps back in their way of thinking and acting. All these elements combined to make this story come across as more of a contemporary romance wearing historical costumes. Those of us who love and adore historical romance want more from it than that. If I wanted to read a contemporary romance, I would (and do)! Other than my disappointment with historical romance being hijacked by people who don't understand and appreciate it, who are just interested in making money off a hot subgenre of romance, I liked the hero and his erstwhile boss-playing-his-valet companion. I could never warm to the heroine because she just seemed too modern for a woman born 250 years ago. By the way, she is not a lady—as the title states—as defined by the Upper Ten Thousand, as her family is not a part of the gentry, let alone the nobility.
I received a free copy of this book, but that did not affect my review.