What do you think?
Rate this book
Spinoza, Life and Legacy
A biography of the boldest and most unsettling of the early modern philosophers, Spinoza, which examines the man's life, relationships, writings, and career, while also forcing us to rethink how we previously understood Spinoza's reception in his own time and in the years following his death.
The boldest and most unsettling of the major early modern philosophers, Spinoza, had a much greater, if often concealed, impact on the international intellectual scene and on the early Enlightenment than philosophers, historians, and political theorists have conventionally tended to recognize. Europe-wide efforts to prevent the reading public and university students learning about Spinoza, the man and his work, in the years immediately after his death in 1677, dominated much of his early
reception owing to the revolutionary implications of his thought for philosophy, religion, practical ethics and lifestyle, Bible criticism, and political theory. Nevertheless, contrary to what has sometimes been maintained, his general impact was immediate, very widespread, and profound. One of the main
objectives of the book is to show how early and how deeply Leibniz, Bayle, Arnauld, Henry More, Anne Conway, Richard Baxter, Robert Boyle, Henry Oldenburg, Pierre-Daniel Huet, Richard Simon, and Nicholas Steno, among many others, were affected by and led to wrestle with his principal ideas.
There have been surprisingly few biographies of Spinoza, given his fundamental importance in intellectual history and history of philosophy, Bible criticism, and political thought. Jonathan I. Israel has written a biography which provides more detail and context about Spinoza's life, family, writings, circle of friends, highly unusual career and networking, and early reception than its predecessors. Weaving the circumstances of his life and thought into a detailed biography has also led to
several notable instances of nuancing or revising our notions of how to interpret certain of his assertions and philosophical claims, and how to understand the complex international reaction to his work during his life-time and in the years immediately following his death.
The boldest and most unsettling of the major early modern philosophers, Spinoza, had a much greater, if often concealed, impact on the international intellectual scene and on the early Enlightenment than philosophers, historians, and political theorists have conventionally tended to recognize. Europe-wide efforts to prevent the reading public and university students learning about Spinoza, the man and his work, in the years immediately after his death in 1677, dominated much of his early
reception owing to the revolutionary implications of his thought for philosophy, religion, practical ethics and lifestyle, Bible criticism, and political theory. Nevertheless, contrary to what has sometimes been maintained, his general impact was immediate, very widespread, and profound. One of the main
objectives of the book is to show how early and how deeply Leibniz, Bayle, Arnauld, Henry More, Anne Conway, Richard Baxter, Robert Boyle, Henry Oldenburg, Pierre-Daniel Huet, Richard Simon, and Nicholas Steno, among many others, were affected by and led to wrestle with his principal ideas.
There have been surprisingly few biographies of Spinoza, given his fundamental importance in intellectual history and history of philosophy, Bible criticism, and political thought. Jonathan I. Israel has written a biography which provides more detail and context about Spinoza's life, family, writings, circle of friends, highly unusual career and networking, and early reception than its predecessors. Weaving the circumstances of his life and thought into a detailed biography has also led to
several notable instances of nuancing or revising our notions of how to interpret certain of his assertions and philosophical claims, and how to understand the complex international reaction to his work during his life-time and in the years immediately following his death.
1335 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 2023
56 people are currently reading
362 people want to read
About the author
Jonathan I. Israel
56 books159 followersJonathan Irvine Israel is a British writer on Dutch history, the Age of Enlightenment and European Jews. Israel was appointed as Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the School of Historical Studies at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, in January 2001. He was previously Professor of Dutch History and Institutions at the University of London.
In recent years, Israel has focused his attention on a multi-volume history of the Age of Enlightenment. He contrasts two camps. The "radical Enlightenment" founded on a rationalist materialism first articulated by Spinoza. Standing in opposition was a "moderate Enlightenment" which he sees as profoundly weakened by its belief in God. In Israel’s highly controversial interpretation, the radical Enlightenment is the main source of the modern idea of freedom. He contends that the moderate Enlightenment, including Locke, Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau, made no real contribution to the campaign against superstition and ignorance.
In recent years, Israel has focused his attention on a multi-volume history of the Age of Enlightenment. He contrasts two camps. The "radical Enlightenment" founded on a rationalist materialism first articulated by Spinoza. Standing in opposition was a "moderate Enlightenment" which he sees as profoundly weakened by its belief in God. In Israel’s highly controversial interpretation, the radical Enlightenment is the main source of the modern idea of freedom. He contends that the moderate Enlightenment, including Locke, Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Rousseau, made no real contribution to the campaign against superstition and ignorance.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
January 8, 2024
While he was a confirmed and vehement anti-Trinitarian, nevertheless, Spinoza was a critical force in establishing a triumvirate of his own, namely the three fields comprising that of science, religion and philosophy. During the time when he was active, these fields were considered to border each other as knowledge-systems and, consequently, came to rely upon each other for creating a truth-value that was unique to the practice of each field of "art", both in terms of being conducive to its time-period and in terms of shaping the emergent ideological construction of its own aesthetic nature. I read nearly this entire book and yet, despite having gained a greater appreciation of Spinoza as a critical figure of the European Enlightenment, I am at somewhat at a loss as far as being able to point to the positive knowledge that Spinoza left behind, unless one could consider the fostering of an atmosphere of impiety among the irreligious cognoscenti to be 'positive knowledge'. In my opinion, Spinoza was a crucial figure in terms of the restructuring of the educational system that would eventually allow the founding fathers to unfurl their deistic attitude in the American continent and so establish the New World, and the natural world it represented, as the domain of an Enlightened people living in pure freedom, and therefore not subject to the rule of any king of ultimate confining law-system. Five stars, three but for Robin Friedman's recommendation, I'd wager it gains the other two.
November 13, 2023
Zelden zo lang over een boek gedaan, maar het was de moeite waard. Het is niet alleeen een biografie van Spinoza (en dat zou nooit zo'n dik boek worden), maar ook een geschiedenis vn de filosofie in de 17de eeuw en ook van geschiedenis van Nederland en West-Europa in die tijd. Filosofie omvatte in die tijd ook nog theologie en exacte wetenschappen. Israel schetst een goed beeld van de godsdiensttwisten in de 2de helft van de 17de eeuw, alsook van het staatsbestel en de politieke keuzes.
In die tijd is er de strijd tussen de Orangisten (meest calvinist of remonstrant) en de voorstanders van de republiek. Die laatsten verloren in het rampjaar 1672; met als dieptepunt het lynchen van de gebroeders de Witt. Spinoza had zeer revolutionaire ideeen, waarvoor hij dus eerst al door de Joodse gemeenschap in de ban was gedaan, en later ook moest oppassen vor het protestantse gezag. Hij had veel ideeen, die afweken, o.a. dat wonderen niet bestonden, dat de bijbel niet door God was ingegeven, maar gewoon door meerdere mensen was opgeschreven etc. etc. Nu schrikken wij daar niet meer van, maar in die tijd was het zeer revolutionair en ook letterlijk levensgevaarlijk om dit soort opvattingen te hebben, laat staan ze te drukken.
Al met al is dit een zeer erudiet boek, er moet enorm veel werk in hebben gezeten, en ik heb er veel van geleerd.
In die tijd is er de strijd tussen de Orangisten (meest calvinist of remonstrant) en de voorstanders van de republiek. Die laatsten verloren in het rampjaar 1672; met als dieptepunt het lynchen van de gebroeders de Witt. Spinoza had zeer revolutionaire ideeen, waarvoor hij dus eerst al door de Joodse gemeenschap in de ban was gedaan, en later ook moest oppassen vor het protestantse gezag. Hij had veel ideeen, die afweken, o.a. dat wonderen niet bestonden, dat de bijbel niet door God was ingegeven, maar gewoon door meerdere mensen was opgeschreven etc. etc. Nu schrikken wij daar niet meer van, maar in die tijd was het zeer revolutionair en ook letterlijk levensgevaarlijk om dit soort opvattingen te hebben, laat staan ze te drukken.
Al met al is dit een zeer erudiet boek, er moet enorm veel werk in hebben gezeten, en ik heb er veel van geleerd.
September 14, 2023
Niet alleen het beste boek wat in 2023 is uitgeven (wat mij betreft) maar wellicht een van de beste boeken die de laatste 10 jaar is uitgegeven en veruit het beste boek wat ik over Spinoza heb gelezen. Hier wordt een nieuwe standaard gezet voor hoe je intellectuele biografieën behoort te schrijven. Alles heeft zijn plek, nergens gehaast of afgeraffeld, alles duidelijk toegelicht, objectief, analytisch, kortom gewoon perfect.
Sinds Israel zijn boek over de Republiek (1995) en eerste deel over de Radicale Verlichting uitgaf (2001) heb ik zitten wachten tot hij zijn aandacht zou gaan vestigen op Spinoza alleen. In De Radicale Verlichting had hij dat ook al gedaan, maar smaakte naar meer.
Het boek is alles waar ik op had gehoopt en meer. Als ik het 10 sterren zou geven dan zou ik dat doen. Dit is nu het standaardwerk over Spinoza en zal dat ook nog jaren blijven.
Absolute aanrader.
Sinds Israel zijn boek over de Republiek (1995) en eerste deel over de Radicale Verlichting uitgaf (2001) heb ik zitten wachten tot hij zijn aandacht zou gaan vestigen op Spinoza alleen. In De Radicale Verlichting had hij dat ook al gedaan, maar smaakte naar meer.
Het boek is alles waar ik op had gehoopt en meer. Als ik het 10 sterren zou geven dan zou ik dat doen. Dit is nu het standaardwerk over Spinoza en zal dat ook nog jaren blijven.
Absolute aanrader.
October 12, 2024
Conclusion only.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews