I read this book for two reasons.
One, I am a neuroscientist who takes engaging with neurophilosophy seriously.
Two, I am currently shadowing a professor and teaching neuroethics within an introductory neuroscience to first-year undergraduates using a much more outdated book and am thus looking for a more up to date text to use for future students, should I get the chance to build my own introductory neuroscience course in the near future.
Given that this book is described in the introduction as being useful in both contexts, I figured this would be a slam dunk.
Overall, May does a great job of outlining a lot of the relevant issues in neuroscience and neuroethics today, and his arguments are well-put together and do a solid job of melding real neuroscience data with important moral philosophical debates. I think the book is also well divided up into sections in a way that makes it effective to use for a class.
Unfortunately, I think the main flaw of this book is that it is a bit more advanced both in its neuroscience content and its philosophical reasoning. Thus, I can't really see myself using this in the intro class. I do however, feel this would make a strong central text to a higher level neuroethics course that has introductory neuroscience and introductory philosophy as pre-requisites. It is otherwise a solid choice for neuroscientists looking to learn more about neuroethics and for professors looking for a strong text for a neuroethics course!