This was a very good book to read following Jane Austin, because it is one that provides a great and contrasting view of French society as compared to English society in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. At times, fascinating, at other times, tedious to read, it shows de Balzac as the brilliant but undisciplined writer that he was
Of most interest to me, were his analysis of journalism as a corrupt craft. Many of his observations and insightful remarks could be well applied as a critique to American journalism today almost as interesting were his scathing observations on the self-serving duplicity rampant in French social dealings.
What both England and France served in this., Is an emphasis on personal advancement Through social connections, especially marriages in both countries, and mistresses as well as marriages in France.
There is a tremendous amount of information that would be of interest to historians of printing and paper making, for the story details, one man’s quest to find an inexpensive alternative to rag based paper pulp, due to an explosion in popular literacy and reading during the period.
All in all I liked this book quite a bit, but was ready to see it and. It’s sometimes sentimental, sometimes melodramatic, sometimes bombastic, but studied with Literary Bonmot that sparkle like gems