Using in-depth qualitative interviews, authors Herbert J. Rubin and Irene S. Rubin have researched topics ranging from community redevelopment programs to the politics of budgeting and been energized by the depth, thoroughness, and credibility of what was revealed. They describe in-depth qualitative interviewing from beginning to end, from its underlying philosophy and assumptions to project design, analysis and write up.
One of my fave book regarding qualitative interviewing. The author gave some descriptive details on reasons and type of research which should employ qualitative method. Rubin also points out a few general example on interview guide and how to structure your data presentation. After reading this book, i found that social study is about exploring social occurrence in the real world and try to explain it to audience particularly the one who will read your writings. There's nothing wrong and right, thus there's no one size fits all model that could be used. This insight however, somehow makes me edgy and realize that social study is indeed very interesting due to its dynamic and fluidity.
For pragmatic purposes I think it's an extremely useful text, looking at how to get good interviews and make your participants feel at ease in the interview. It's a very "interview as research instrument" type of approach though as Talmy would put it and I take a more critical stance, but for most people who aren't linguists it'll be really useful.
A very insightful book into conducting interviews. I found it easy to read and most of the information given relevant to my tasks. A must-read if you would like to improve your interviewing skills in an academic context
3.5 stars. If you've spent much of any time reading about (or doing) qualitative interviewing, this book will be review, providing limited new content or ideas. If you're new to in-depth qualitative interviewing Rubin and Rubin's book is an easy-to-read introduction providing step-by-step suggestions for framing and conducting your work. On the whole I'm a bit torn because the Rubins provide many examples to demonstrate their points -- which is good -- but I found many of the examples too long or focused on work that I didn't care about and couldn't easily relate to my own work (which is my issue, not the authors'). And, both Herb and Irene's work seems to focus on concrete questions with concrete answers rather than slightly more abstract, conceptual questions. While this may be exactly what some readers need, for my work, which is more ideological, other resources are more helpful in guiding how I frame and conduct my research.