Having recently read a book that clearly explained the roots of the current Middle East crisis (The Balfour Declaration: The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict), I felt it would be helpful, in the interest of self-education beyond news media, to read further on the subject from both the Palestinian and the Israeli perspectives. Decolonizing Palestine: The Land, The People, The Bible by Mitri Raheb is an extraordinarily articulate account of the former. Raheb packs a lot of weighty arguments into a short book, and being born and still living in Bethlehem enables him to provide a valuable insider Palestinian perspective.
Raheb quickly defines “settler colonialism” as follows: “The settler colonialists establish and enforce state sovereignty and juridical control over the indigenous land, ultimately aiming to eliminate the native people. The natives become extraneous while the settlers are cast as natives through different political mechanisms, ideological constructs, and social narratives.” And rather than a completed event in the past, settler colonialism is an ongoing process, more like a constantly turning dial than the flick of a switch.
Raheb also maintains that the Israeli settler colonialism of Palestine is the last example of colonialism in a post-colonial world. But historical examples are not wanting: Australia and the Aborigines, America and native Americans, and South Africa and indigenous Africans. Current Israeli settler colonialism in Palestine is also a profound mismatch with the description of what the Balfour Declaration, crafted by the British, intended it to be, namely, “…the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people…it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine…”
There is plenty of theology in Decolonizing Palestine, but it occurs primarily as Raheb seeks to decouple biblical theology as the justification argument for Israeli presence in Palestine. In this context, I encountered a new word, hermeneutics, which means “the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially scriptural text.” Now, while many interpretations can coalesce around a core truth, they can also differ in nuance, emphasis, and repetition, which can be used to persuade large numbers of people to believe one thing or another.
One philosophical argument Raheb makes is that Palestine has withstood occupation by many countries and empires before now. The occupying countries and empires have always left; Palestinians have remained. “Due to its geopolitical position between powers,” says Raheb, “Palestine has often been an occupied land: occupied by the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, Crusaders, Ottomans, British, and now by the Israelis.”
Raheb emphasizes this point one final time in the Epilogue as a counter to settler colonialism. “If the name of the game for Israelis is settler colonialism, the name of the game for Palestinians is resilience: sumud. For more than seventy years, Palestinians have faithfully shown a tremendous strength to resist, incredible forms of resilience, and creative ways to survive. The Palestinians are not moving, and they will persist in the face of the Israeli settler colonial project.”
[Note: If anyone has book recommendations on the Palestine-Israeli conflict from a contemporary Israeli perspective, please share.]