After having so wholeheartedly extolled Mead's Fragments of a Faith Forgotten, I now slide over the spectrum to what might be one of his worst books.
If one really wants to know about Apollonius of Tyana, the place to go is Philostratus' biography available from the Loeb Library. But the ancients are often painful for us moderns to read, so, failing that, Mead's book is a constructive and readable appropriation of that material and the little obtainable elsewhere about the ancient philosopher and thaumaturge.
Here, unlike the Fragments, Mead's own prejudices obtrude. His aim is to set Apollonius up as an alternative to Jesus, a superior alternative, by showing how Apollonius, and others, did what Jesus supposedly did, but better. While is is certainly good to know that miracles, like raising the dead, weren't unique to Jesus but were almost necessary indicators of a religious teacher's authority, Mead's way of making such points displays a distressing animus towards Christianity, an animus which fails to see such virtues as were maintained by the early Church such as its appeal to the poor and downtrodden.