Source of book: NetGalley (thank you!)
Relevant disclaimers: None
Please note: This review may not be reproduced or quoted, in whole or in part, without explicit consent from the author.
It’s an odd business, coming to a book you know publishing is setting up to succeed. This one was won in something like a four-way auction in my neck of the woods and a five-way stateside, plus pre-emptive translation deals in multiple other countries. The amount of money that must have changed hands over this is slightly unimaginable to me and I find myself asking the sort of questions that no individual text should bear the weight of: such as, what should a multimillion dollarpound book be like?
All of which is slightly ironic because of the central questions of A Very Nice Girl is, what is art worth.
In any case this, is a very good book. I might even go far as to say—and for what little my judgement worth—an exceptional book. Is multimillion dollarpounds of exceptional? Who the fuck knows? But then, Simon and Schuster were willing to fork over $4 million dollars to Mike Pence to talk about himself so who the fuck knows anything?
A Very Nice Girl (a title which seems very much imposed on the book by a team who hasn’t read but is determined to sell it into a certain market) explores a year in the life of Anna: a trainee opera singer who came to London, without the emotional or financial support of her life, to study a prestigious conservatory and, y’know, follow her dream and shit. Anna is an interesting character, being both extremely ambitious and extremely damaged, though she’s also quite elusive. A strange side effect of the first-person narration is that the focus is so claustrophobic, and Anna herself so unreliable, that it’s impossible to actually to see her clearly.
Anyway, while working one of many low-paid singing jobs, Anne meets Max, a forty-year-old city financier. He’s handsome, cold, in the midst of a divorce, she doesn’t even think she likes him very much. But, somehow, she wants his approval. And so they go to dinner, and so they begin a … well. A relationship in all but name. As Anna struggles with the various expenses of living in London, Max lends her money, finds her flat, and gradually Anna finds herself sacrificing more and more of her burgeoning career to the possibility of love, and future, with Max.
So far, so much a story we’ve all read before. And yet. And yet. I don’t have multimillion dollarpounds to back me up but I can’t deny there’s *something* here. Something that makes what could so easily have been a fairly conventional story of a toxic relationship, a bad man and a vulnerable young woman feel unique and intriguing. It’s neither a thriller nor a romance, but it contains the elements I particularly admire in both: a tautly constructed narrative coupled with razor-sharp character work. Above all, I think, a commitment to emotional ambiguity and complex character dynamics that have left me thinking about A Very Nice Girl long after I finished reading it.
It’s also a hard book to talk about because it plays so much with perception, interpretation and uncertainty. Even now, I’m sitting here, trying to assess (without going full victim-blame) the degree to which Max was emotionally abusive. Because, as the book itself points out, while Anna discusses her relationship with her best friend Laurie, there is a narrative here—a simpler, cleaner, more feminist-friendly narrative—where he is, and that’s the end of it. And, oh God, I feel like I’m inviting people to throw well-deserved tomatoes at me if I sit here talking about complicity, but Anna is not a simple protagonist and I feel it does the book a disservice to view her as one. She is a woman who excels at being other people: whether that is her mother’s coddled daughter, Laurie’s hard-up bestie, the characters she transforms herself into on stage. And there is no getting away from the fact that while Max (for all he has issues and vulnerabilities of his own) is, in many ways, a destructive force in Anna’s life, he is only the most categorisable one. We accept the narrative of women re-shaping themselves to please men. But what about other women? Parents. Friends. Colleagues. Teachers. Yes, individual men may simply not notice, or take for granted, the degree to which women change aspects of their lives to accommodate them but what is it about way we raise women, about the social context they inhabit, that creates this expectation with women themselves.
And again: please let me emphasise a million times over I am not sitting here swallowing a red pill being like “aaahhhhh but are not *women* the real abusers here.” But for me, part of what’s fascinating about A Very Nice Girl is that allows these questions to exist and for the reader to find their own answers. As it does its messy, flawed and very human heroine.
Stepping away from really difficult topics, I’ll just add that both the dialogue and the writing are very sharp, darkly amusing when they need to be, but also kind of devastating. I also really loved all the stuff about opera, and training to be a professional singer, and the way gender affects both. Max is an incredibly deft, and not wholly unsympathetic, portrait of a particular type of man (like a large proportion of the people I went to university with have turned into him). Slightly less successful for me was Laurie, occupying the brash best friend role (although, again, she not occupy this role uncomplicatedly) and her circle of loudly feminist friends: while they often had meaningful things to say about gender dynamics, they also often came as quite stereotypical (for example, refusing to use sanitary products, and leaving blood on the furniture, because they don't believe menstruation is something to be ashamed of). The only other thing that irritated me slightly—and this feels entirely subjective—was I wasn’t mad keen on the lack of dialogue markers and absent capitalisation. A Certain Points We Touch, which I read recently, played similarly fast and loose with the conventional rules of punctuation but it felt right for the book, and its rejection of binary and heteronormative spaces. In this case I felt like a bit like that Terry Pratchett quote “he knew it was very symbolic but couldn’t remember what it was symbolic of. Maybe it was just symbolic all by itself.”
In any case, a powerful, complicated, intriguing book. Well worth some of your dollerpounds.