I think this would have been a good book if not for some serious flaws. I really did not sympathize with the protagonist until much too late in the book, and there were so many tedious episodes of digression where the narrative would veer away from the plot and launch into several pages worth of historical information about New Orleans. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it just felt too heavy-handed here. More complete review to come.
Full review:
The description of Hell or High Water really intrigued me, but I think that, ultimately, it may be a little misleading. When this is coupled with the prologue, which has a very powerful hook, I think it's only natural to assume that this is going to be an edge-of-your-seat thriller--but it's not. Yes, there is a mystery in this book, and yes there is definitely tension, but the pace moved along much more slowly than I was expecting. Some minor spoilers, but I won't give away the ending.
As my opening suggests, my big issue with this book was pacing. I read a lot of mystery/thriller novels, and I like everything from the more meandering literary styles of a writer like Elizabeth George to the taut, fast pace of someone like Steig Larsson. Because my tastes do run the gamut, I don't think my issues with this book were tied specifically to that. What I found throughout the novel was that the narrative was frequently thrown off by long, detailed passages that had little to nothing to do with the central plot of the book--or even the main character. The book provides a lot of history about New Orleans, which I did appreciate because I don't know much about the city, but I felt these interludes were very misplaced in this book. I really wanted to know what was going to happen next with regard to the mystery, not plow through a long passage about casket girls, no matter how interesting that passage was. It got to the point where I could sense that one of this long digressions was coming, and I would hurry through them until I could get back to the central plot.
I also have to admit that I really didn't like Nola all that much for probably the first third of the book. When I finally realized where her character arc was taking her, it did change my view of her. I think this was actually a pretty masterful bit of writing, because my opinion of the character did go through such an evolution. However, the downside is that I actively disliked Nola for a good chunk of the book, which made it really hard for me to get into it. I'm not sure exactly how this could have been avoided. It seems to me the author took a risk here, and I just happen to be one of those readers who wasn't very fond of the risk. I think I needed to know Nola better and to sympathize more with her before she started self-destructing, because I ended up getting angry with her and wishing she'd snap out of it. I also felt like her friends and roommate didn't react quite enough. Yes, there were some carefully inquiries, but it seems to me that they just spent too much time tiptoeing around her. Nola's behavior is so obnoxious at times that I found it difficult to believe her friends and roommate would just put up with it--to say nothing at all of the way she behaves at work, which I found far-fetched at best.
Still, there is a lot of strength in this novel. I was very interested in Nola's struggles with fitting in, particularly when it came to her attempts to shed her past once she got to Tulane and beyond. Once I had a better grasp of what was going on with Nola, I felt a lot more sympathetic and thought her characterization was an excellent example of how someone might try to deal with a past trauma. The foreshadowing of this might have been a little heavy handed, because I figured out what was wrong with Nola long, long before the book's big reveal, but that didn't ultimately undo what I thought was a very well-drawn portrait of a character.
The mystery was secondary almost to the point of being a plot device. This wouldn't have been a problem in and of itself had it been clear that the mystery was going to take something of a backseat to Nola's character development. However, due to the way the book begins, I expected the mystery to take a much more central role in the story. Though this book does have elements of a thriller, it is, in essence, a book about a character's evolution. Had I known this from the start, I don't think it would have taken me so long to get into the book, because there are so many interesting dynamics to it.
One of the other aspects of the novel that struck me as particularly strong was Nola's relationship with Marisol. Marisol served as both an interesting lens for examining Nola's character, and as a foil for Nola. There was a lot of tension to the relationship--not necessarily between the two characters, but in the way there is an undercurrent of desperation. Though Nola doesn't explicitly state it, I really got the sense that spending time with Marisol was a way for Nola to both try to rewrite her own past, and also to try to save another girl from the fate Nola herself suffered. I thought this dynamic was extremely well done.
In the end, this book was just such a mixed bag. Nola is wonderfully nuanced, flawed, strong, and fascinating as a character, but I thought the handling of some of her back story was just far too heavy-handed. When this book was good, I was really lost in it, but there were too many instances where I could feel the hand of the author at work for me to really enjoy it as much as I would have liked. I think Nola has a lot of potential to be a good character in a series, but she would be much better served if her back story was more subtly woven within the strands of the overall plot.