System theory and evolution
The idea put forward in this book is very good, that is, the idea of solving the problem is transformed into the idea of creation. Taking this as the core, the author begins to explain why this should be done, how to do it, and other extensions. On dry goods, this book is not as good as "Change: Principles of Forming and Solving Problems". However, although the latter is logically clear and concise, the problem is that there is no clear action plan after seeing it, and the Road of Least Resistance gives a feasible solution.
Change the mind: from problem to creation
The first 1/3 of the book basically tells why you should do this. If you are interested, you can read the detailed explanation in the original text.
From the perspective of system theory, "solving the problem" is essentially the problem of dealing with the system within the group theory. Then, by Gödel's incompleteness theorem, we can know that this is impossible to solve completely. "Change" requires us to look at the problem at a higher level and resolve the conflict of the system itself, but how? It is difficult to treat the problem as an objective third party when it is in the middle of the problem. Even if a simple example is given in the book, it can only help to understand, and it is difficult to apply it to real and complicated life easily.
The creative thinking in this book is a viable solution. In other words, instead of focusing on conflicts within the system, we focus on real needs and use the gap between the demand vision and the real reality as a driving force to avoid reverse forces. Take everyone's most commonly mentioned weight loss as an example. The solution to the problem within the system is the conflict between positive and negative forces (the dieting exercise <-> eating and resting). Both of them are justified and the system enters the turbulent hyperstable state. The creation of the jump out system is the driving force of the gap between (health <-> unhealthy), there is only one direction of driving force, and the system enters a spiral rising steady state migration process.
In short, focus on the vision, not just the problem.
How to do it: the enlightenment of evolution
About 1/3 of the content in the middle will be done in three stages: germination, assimilation, and completion. I don't want to repeat the contents of the book in detail, just explore the implementation from the perspective of my own understanding.
First of all, I don't agree with the method of memorizing each stage and then applying it in life. That is, we have to grasp the ideas behind the program, not the content. Further, to grasp the core of various ideas, I realize that various ideas are only about the understanding and expression of different core authors.
I will give my own understanding in the following book.
The first step is to choose a vision and image it. On the one hand, choosing the most important among the many needs; on the other hand, clearly expressing the demand as a vision. The role of imaging is to provide incentives.
The second step is to verify the current state. On the one hand, choose the real factors related to the vision; on the other hand, to realize these factors, and realization is a very big difficulty.
The third step is to establish a system to respond to events. Based on the above two aspects, especially the vision part, rules are created to give decisions during the event change.
The core ideas behind it can be elaborated from the perspective of natural selection (evolution), that is, two key points: the cumulative change, the diversity of choice. When decisions are needed, the vision provides selection criteria to eliminate unsuitable options in diversity. The selected options are retained and become the basis for the next phase, which gradually accumulates. The core of the entire system is in the current decision, not the future goal; in the satisfaction option, not the best option.
From an evolutionary perspective, iteration never ends: we need to choose a phase as the end marker; the future is unknowable: we need to choose one of the right choices at the moment, even if it is not the best choice in the future; fine-tuning can save: we Small changes are needed to ensure survival, that is, mistakes are not fatal; stagnation is extinction: we need to choose trial and error as soon as possible, improper choice gives us the opportunity, and no choice is nothing. (For more on the evolution of the system, check out other related books.)
In short, approach the goal by creating a system.
Extract
The following is an excerpt from some interesting content in the article.
"I choose to have ... p175
The author said that it is a matter of opinion to formally declare your choice. The advantage is that the self suggests abandoning other options, and if written down, it can further track self-decision; however, the more formal the decision, the greater the resistance, and the smaller informal decision is easier to determine.
One powerful way to assimilate your present step is to move on to your next step, even if you feel inadequately prepared for it. When you move to your next step, you are somehow able to incorporate more than you now know about your present step. P202
I agree very much that fast and small decisions (even improper decisions) are far better than no decisions or slow and big decisions (even good decisions).
There are moments in the creative process when it seems that you are farther away from your result than when you began, but in fact you are closer to it. p228
There are two reasons for this. One is the feedback delay in cybernetics, and the other is that we are unable to give the correct positioning in our system. The example in the latter book is very good. If you want to go from one roof to another, you can only go to the ground first. From the outside of the system, this is undoubtedly the fastest option, but in terms of system content, it seems to be far from the target.
If you find yourself repeatedly reviewing how you got to be where you are in your life, you are obscuring a clear view of current reality. p232
In other words, you need to focus on the present, not the future. Many books say that we should pay attention to the power of the moment, such as "simple meditation: activate your potential creativity" and so on (meditation is really useful, recommend attention). So can we recognize the true present? It is very important to say that it is a matter of throwing away the existing concepts (recommended reading "Five Days Learning Painting" to understand the existing concepts that we never realized). However, the real world has already involved the philosophical worldview content (recommended "system philosophy", "worldview", etc.), without having to delve into it, as long as our concepts conform to external experience.
Socially accepted misrepresentation is designed primarily to protect people from feeling bad. p233
The truth is not dangerous, it sets you free to create. It is only through your recognition of the facts of reality that you can engage the senior force of structural tension and move towards creating what really matters to you. p234
In fact, it is still a matter of reality and concept. Borrowing a message from Mr. Lu Xun: "The real warrior dares to face the bleak life and dare to face the dripping blood."
The last broken thought
Having said so many advantages, I also want to vomit the author's writing. There are too many cases and the substance has been overwhelmed by the case. A good book, and finally began to discuss China's democratic issues, I can't keep up with this brain.
In short, the author's point of view is very inspiring and recommended to the partners who are struggling in life and work to read.