What do you think?
Rate this book


205 pages, Paperback
First published April 1, 2006
That being said, the plot felt like it might have been lifted from an outline for a sixth book in Madeleine L'Engle's Time Quintet. Which made me sad that it lacked the metaphysical depth that was characteristic of her books. Also, it almost felt like is was still more of an outline than a novel. It had a very few lovely moments that made me want to really like the characters, but they just weren't developed enough. The events in the story felt at times more like they were being listed than described.
There were too many references to literary devices, and I understand that that was intentional and a part of the story, but the way it was gone about made me feel like the writer might make a better literary critic or English teacher than novelist.
The biggest challenge to my enjoyment of this book though was the sentence structure. When J.R.R. Tolkien or C.S. Lewis condescend to the reader, we understand that adults all thought they had to condescend to children to write for them back when they were alive, and we forgive them. When every single sentence is subject, verb, object these days, we call it what it is: tedious, sterile and disengaging.