What do you think?
Rate this book
Rocketship Galileo
Рос Дженкинс, Арт Мюлер и Морис Абрамс не са обикновени ученици от гимназията. Докато другите деца се возят в колите си или играят на топка, това трио, известно като клуб „Галилео“, експериментира с ракетни горива, подготвяйки се за бъдещото си образование в техническите университети.
Чичото на Арт, атомният физик д-р Доналд Каргрейвс, им предлага възможността на живота им: да конструират и управляват ракета, която ще ги отведе до Луната. Каргрейвс вярва, че като обединят изобретателността и ентусиазма си, могат действително да осъществят тази цел. Но има хора, които не споделят мечтата им и няма да се спрат пред нищо, за да задържат ракетата им на Земята.
Чичото на Арт, атомният физик д-р Доналд Каргрейвс, им предлага възможността на живота им: да конструират и управляват ракета, която ще ги отведе до Луната. Каргрейвс вярва, че като обединят изобретателността и ентусиазма си, могат действително да осъществят тази цел. Но има хора, които не споделят мечтата им и няма да се спрат пред нищо, за да задържат ракетата им на Земята.
160 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1947
183 people are currently reading
3491 people want to read
About the author
Robert A. Heinlein
1,053 books10.4k followersRobert Anson Heinlein was an American science fiction author, aeronautical engineer, and naval officer. Sometimes called the "dean of science fiction writers", he was among the first to emphasize scientific accuracy in his fiction, and was thus a pioneer of the subgenre of hard science fiction. His published works, both fiction and non-fiction, express admiration for competence and emphasize the value of critical thinking. His plots often posed provocative situations which challenged conventional social mores. His work continues to have an influence on the science-fiction genre, and on modern culture more generally.
Heinlein became one of the first American science-fiction writers to break into mainstream magazines such as The Saturday Evening Post in the late 1940s. He was one of the best-selling science-fiction novelists for many decades, and he, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke are often considered the "Big Three" of English-language science fiction authors. Notable Heinlein works include Stranger in a Strange Land, Starship Troopers (which helped mold the space marine and mecha archetypes) and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. His work sometimes had controversial aspects, such as plural marriage in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, militarism in Starship Troopers and technologically competent women characters who were formidable, yet often stereotypically feminine—such as Friday.
Heinlein used his science fiction as a way to explore provocative social and political ideas and to speculate how progress in science and engineering might shape the future of politics, race, religion, and sex. Within the framework of his science-fiction stories, Heinlein repeatedly addressed certain social themes: the importance of individual liberty and self-reliance, the nature of sexual relationships, the obligation individuals owe to their societies, the influence of organized religion on culture and government, and the tendency of society to repress nonconformist thought. He also speculated on the influence of space travel on human cultural practices.
Heinlein was named the first Science Fiction Writers Grand Master in 1974. Four of his novels won Hugo Awards. In addition, fifty years after publication, seven of his works were awarded "Retro Hugos"—awards given retrospectively for works that were published before the Hugo Awards came into existence. In his fiction, Heinlein coined terms that have become part of the English language, including grok, waldo and speculative fiction, as well as popularizing existing terms like "TANSTAAFL", "pay it forward", and "space marine". He also anticipated mechanical computer-aided design with "Drafting Dan" and described a modern version of a waterbed in his novel Beyond This Horizon.
Also wrote under Pen names: Anson McDonald, Lyle Monroe, Caleb Saunders, John Riverside and Simon York.
Heinlein became one of the first American science-fiction writers to break into mainstream magazines such as The Saturday Evening Post in the late 1940s. He was one of the best-selling science-fiction novelists for many decades, and he, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke are often considered the "Big Three" of English-language science fiction authors. Notable Heinlein works include Stranger in a Strange Land, Starship Troopers (which helped mold the space marine and mecha archetypes) and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. His work sometimes had controversial aspects, such as plural marriage in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, militarism in Starship Troopers and technologically competent women characters who were formidable, yet often stereotypically feminine—such as Friday.
Heinlein used his science fiction as a way to explore provocative social and political ideas and to speculate how progress in science and engineering might shape the future of politics, race, religion, and sex. Within the framework of his science-fiction stories, Heinlein repeatedly addressed certain social themes: the importance of individual liberty and self-reliance, the nature of sexual relationships, the obligation individuals owe to their societies, the influence of organized religion on culture and government, and the tendency of society to repress nonconformist thought. He also speculated on the influence of space travel on human cultural practices.
Heinlein was named the first Science Fiction Writers Grand Master in 1974. Four of his novels won Hugo Awards. In addition, fifty years after publication, seven of his works were awarded "Retro Hugos"—awards given retrospectively for works that were published before the Hugo Awards came into existence. In his fiction, Heinlein coined terms that have become part of the English language, including grok, waldo and speculative fiction, as well as popularizing existing terms like "TANSTAAFL", "pay it forward", and "space marine". He also anticipated mechanical computer-aided design with "Drafting Dan" and described a modern version of a waterbed in his novel Beyond This Horizon.
Also wrote under Pen names: Anson McDonald, Lyle Monroe, Caleb Saunders, John Riverside and Simon York.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 327 reviews
May 22, 2019
Rocket Ship Galileo is a Heinlein classic, good, straight up science fiction, and a fun story with some genuine twists.
True, it is not ageless, the 1947 publication date speaks volumes about what the reader will encounter, but reading between the lines, the reader can also find the beginnings of RAH’s budding libertarianism.
Not too far removed from his time in the Navy, a crisp, starched, straight postured militarism is still noticeably present. Good fun.
** 2019 addendum - it is a testament to great literature that a reader recalls the work years later and this is a book about which I frequently think. I need to re-read Heinlein's juvenile works, campy and corny as they can be, they're also a lot of fun.
True, it is not ageless, the 1947 publication date speaks volumes about what the reader will encounter, but reading between the lines, the reader can also find the beginnings of RAH’s budding libertarianism.
Not too far removed from his time in the Navy, a crisp, starched, straight postured militarism is still noticeably present. Good fun.
** 2019 addendum - it is a testament to great literature that a reader recalls the work years later and this is a book about which I frequently think. I need to re-read Heinlein's juvenile works, campy and corny as they can be, they're also a lot of fun.
August 10, 2016
The first thing that you need to know would be that this book was written for children. I knew that before reading, but I still had high expectations for it. I was not that impressed with this one, and I can thank the last 1/3 of the book for that.
The novel started out really strong. Anything space related is interesting for me, especially the moon. Like I said, this book is for children, so normally the author would introduce characters of the same age as the targeted audience. Lately that hasn't been a huge problem for me, and that isn't really the reason why I didn't like this that much.
The main reason would be that the transition was way too fast and the pacing was lost around 60-75% of the novel.
3/5 stars. Most people would probably find this boring, but the novel is way too short for you not to give it a try. While it was not mind-blowing in my experience, and it will probably never be part of my top read books, I still believe that you should give this a try for a quick adequate read.
---Spoilers beyond this----
The first half of the book was about the three young guys who had plans of going to the moon. When they met their uncle by accident, they finally got what they wished for. They got their parents' consent and were finally allowed to go to the moon. The part of them meeting their uncle, and the persuading part were both very long, but all of a sudden the next chapter says that they're ready for take-off. I honestly hate novels with bad transitions, and unfortunately this falls under the bad ones. There were a lot of redeeming qualities, but unfortunately this is a low three-stars for me. I'm going to continue on with the series for sure, but I might just listen to the rest instead of reading them.
Last point, I didn't expect the Nazis to be there. While the idea was unique, I didn't find it enjoyable. It seemed too unrealistic to happen for me, and that's why I didn't like it that much.
The novel started out really strong. Anything space related is interesting for me, especially the moon. Like I said, this book is for children, so normally the author would introduce characters of the same age as the targeted audience. Lately that hasn't been a huge problem for me, and that isn't really the reason why I didn't like this that much.
The main reason would be that the transition was way too fast and the pacing was lost around 60-75% of the novel.
3/5 stars. Most people would probably find this boring, but the novel is way too short for you not to give it a try. While it was not mind-blowing in my experience, and it will probably never be part of my top read books, I still believe that you should give this a try for a quick adequate read.
---Spoilers beyond this----
The first half of the book was about the three young guys who had plans of going to the moon. When they met their uncle by accident, they finally got what they wished for. They got their parents' consent and were finally allowed to go to the moon. The part of them meeting their uncle, and the persuading part were both very long, but all of a sudden the next chapter says that they're ready for take-off. I honestly hate novels with bad transitions, and unfortunately this falls under the bad ones. There were a lot of redeeming qualities, but unfortunately this is a low three-stars for me. I'm going to continue on with the series for sure, but I might just listen to the rest instead of reading them.
Last point, I didn't expect the Nazis to be there. While the idea was unique, I didn't find it enjoyable. It seemed too unrealistic to happen for me, and that's why I didn't like it that much.
June 29, 2024
Re-Read 6/29/24:
Another buddy read, but this time with a new victim -- I mean, a receiver of wholesome rocket-ship building from before the ACTUAL space race.
I think it's just so -- can do. We don't get much of this at all these days. And while it does feel like a new adult kind of novel, it's all about the spirit of adventure.
The funny thing is, I just read this last year, and yet I don't mind revisiting it at all. :)
Original Review:
I had to show my girl some of the old SF greats. Being a juvenile, herself, I thought it would be best to give her a taste of Heinlein's Juveniles, AND WE'RE BOTH GLAD WE DID.
This particular book was published in 1947, and considering the TIME it was published, it's pretty amazing. Consider the fact that Heinlein was writing about nuclear power rockets using as much of the science he was able to learn, as accurately as he could, in a YA. And not only was it hopeful and adventuresome with a hefty dose of can-do attitude, we even got a little popular ANTIFA action against the Nazis. RAH (Robert A. Heinlein) RAH RAH RAH!
It was delightful. A handful of young men and their mentor go to the moon. Sure, there's a little gloss-over with pre-fabbed rockets (an industry well under way) and a lot of everything else, but the basic science was there and it was written in a fun way.
Best of all, I have to point out that our own real space race had not gotten into gear yet. People's imaginations were not quite ready to pour so much of our resources into the grand competition. But Heinlein was there. Early. And serious about the science. :)
As for my girl, she was always attentive and loved the math (because she likes math) and thought the story was pretty damn fun. (Her words.) We flew through it together and she says she wants to read a LOT more Heinlein.
Ah, I love it. I remember when I went crazy, too, just a little older than her. :)
Another buddy read, but this time with a new victim -- I mean, a receiver of wholesome rocket-ship building from before the ACTUAL space race.
I think it's just so -- can do. We don't get much of this at all these days. And while it does feel like a new adult kind of novel, it's all about the spirit of adventure.
The funny thing is, I just read this last year, and yet I don't mind revisiting it at all. :)
Original Review:
I had to show my girl some of the old SF greats. Being a juvenile, herself, I thought it would be best to give her a taste of Heinlein's Juveniles, AND WE'RE BOTH GLAD WE DID.
This particular book was published in 1947, and considering the TIME it was published, it's pretty amazing. Consider the fact that Heinlein was writing about nuclear power rockets using as much of the science he was able to learn, as accurately as he could, in a YA. And not only was it hopeful and adventuresome with a hefty dose of can-do attitude, we even got a little popular ANTIFA action against the Nazis. RAH (Robert A. Heinlein) RAH RAH RAH!
It was delightful. A handful of young men and their mentor go to the moon. Sure, there's a little gloss-over with pre-fabbed rockets (an industry well under way) and a lot of everything else, but the basic science was there and it was written in a fun way.
Best of all, I have to point out that our own real space race had not gotten into gear yet. People's imaginations were not quite ready to pour so much of our resources into the grand competition. But Heinlein was there. Early. And serious about the science. :)
As for my girl, she was always attentive and loved the math (because she likes math) and thought the story was pretty damn fun. (Her words.) We flew through it together and she says she wants to read a LOT more Heinlein.
Ah, I love it. I remember when I went crazy, too, just a little older than her. :)
February 3, 2013
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Okay guys, welcome to the Moon!
SECOND HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Explain again how we got here?
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Wallace and Gromit showed us how to build a moon rocket in our basement. The rest was easy.
THIRD HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Who?
NAZI IN SPACESUIT: Guten Abend, meine Herren! Ve are all on ze same side, nicht wahr?
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Sorry Fritz, there's been a change of plan. [Shoots him]
NAZI IN SPACESUIT: Schweinhund! Aaargh!
SECOND HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: I thought that in space, no one could hear you scream?
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Don't be silly, Sigourney Weaver hasn't been born yet.
THIRD HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Who?
SECOND HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Explain again how we got here?
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Wallace and Gromit showed us how to build a moon rocket in our basement. The rest was easy.
THIRD HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Who?
NAZI IN SPACESUIT: Guten Abend, meine Herren! Ve are all on ze same side, nicht wahr?
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Sorry Fritz, there's been a change of plan. [Shoots him]
NAZI IN SPACESUIT: Schweinhund! Aaargh!
SECOND HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: I thought that in space, no one could hear you scream?
FIRST HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Don't be silly, Sigourney Weaver hasn't been born yet.
THIRD HIGHSCHOOL GEEK: Who?
November 17, 2023
Man did I love the Heinlein young adult SiFi as a kid. they really got me into the genre. Great read for a young reader just getting into SiFi. Recommended
September 5, 2022
"A man isn't a collection of chemical reactions; he is a collection of ideas."
La primera novela publicada de Heinlein y la primera de sus famosas novelas juveniles de Scribner's.
⠀
Por desgracia se convierte en una de las más flojitas que he leído hasta ahora. Creo que pudo haber sido mucho mejor de haber explotado el tema de las ruinas. Le tiro la culpa al hecho de haber sido escrita muy cerca del final de la Segunda Guerra y la fiebre del atomic power.⠀
⠀
Y eso es, la energía atómica en este libro es usada no para otro proyecto Manhattan, sino para propulsar naves espaciales. Emocionante, sí; aunque tal vez más emocionante por aquella época, veintidos años antes del Apolo 11. Sin embargo, hubo algo que sí hizo retorcer mi alma de emoción: la idea de la fundación de Luna City, la primera ciudad selenita. Vamos, ya, NASA, ¿cuándo una basecita lunar?⠀
⠀
Y como no podía ser de otra forma, porque lo hecho por el Führer hizo que querramos seguir leyendo historias solo para derrotarlos nuevamente, se encuentran en la luna con.... ya lo digo... viene spoiler.... ¡NAZIS! Sí, nazis con planes atómicamente disparatados.⠀
⠀
Si sirve de consuelo, la relación Heinlein/Luna mejora con el tiempo. Si no me creen, échenle mano a La luna es una cruel amante. Una de las mejores novelas de ciencia ficción que he tenido el placer de leer.
La primera novela publicada de Heinlein y la primera de sus famosas novelas juveniles de Scribner's.
⠀
Por desgracia se convierte en una de las más flojitas que he leído hasta ahora. Creo que pudo haber sido mucho mejor de haber explotado el tema de las ruinas. Le tiro la culpa al hecho de haber sido escrita muy cerca del final de la Segunda Guerra y la fiebre del atomic power.⠀
⠀
Y eso es, la energía atómica en este libro es usada no para otro proyecto Manhattan, sino para propulsar naves espaciales. Emocionante, sí; aunque tal vez más emocionante por aquella época, veintidos años antes del Apolo 11. Sin embargo, hubo algo que sí hizo retorcer mi alma de emoción: la idea de la fundación de Luna City, la primera ciudad selenita. Vamos, ya, NASA, ¿cuándo una basecita lunar?⠀
⠀
Y como no podía ser de otra forma, porque lo hecho por el Führer hizo que querramos seguir leyendo historias solo para derrotarlos nuevamente, se encuentran en la luna con.... ya lo digo... viene spoiler.... ¡NAZIS! Sí, nazis con planes atómicamente disparatados.⠀
⠀
Si sirve de consuelo, la relación Heinlein/Luna mejora con el tiempo. Si no me creen, échenle mano a La luna es una cruel amante. Una de las mejores novelas de ciencia ficción que he tenido el placer de leer.
June 30, 2024
My apologies to Mr. Heinlein for not reviewing this the day I read it but I was out and about. In no way does that reflect on my enjoyment (or lack thereof) of this story.
This is the first of the so-called "juvelines" by RAH. It's about a nuclear physicist and three high school students (a nephew of the scientist amongst them) who form a club and build a rocketship to go to the Moon. Mind you, this must have been about a decade before the actual space race. They actually succeed but would have never guessed who they meet and the danger they will all be in ().
What an adventure! Sure, it's not set in the future, there is no impressive tech. But there is ingenuity, a kind of McGyver spirit (long before that show existed) and a can-do mentality!
If only I had known stories such as this one back when I was a teen! I'd have freaked my teachers out with all the questions about the physics of the rockets and whatnot. *loool* No, teachers here are not as intrepid as one knows at least from American movies / TV shows and don't seem to read this kind of can-do literature themselves either. And you can forget about me having uncles like that. Which makes it all the more heart-warming to read about such people in books like this.
Not my favorite of the few I know so far but I can see the allure of it and it was really a fun romp.
This is the first of the so-called "juvelines" by RAH. It's about a nuclear physicist and three high school students (a nephew of the scientist amongst them) who form a club and build a rocketship to go to the Moon. Mind you, this must have been about a decade before the actual space race. They actually succeed but would have never guessed who they meet and the danger they will all be in ().
What an adventure! Sure, it's not set in the future, there is no impressive tech. But there is ingenuity, a kind of McGyver spirit (long before that show existed) and a can-do mentality!
If only I had known stories such as this one back when I was a teen! I'd have freaked my teachers out with all the questions about the physics of the rockets and whatnot. *loool* No, teachers here are not as intrepid as one knows at least from American movies / TV shows and don't seem to read this kind of can-do literature themselves either. And you can forget about me having uncles like that. Which makes it all the more heart-warming to read about such people in books like this.
Not my favorite of the few I know so far but I can see the allure of it and it was really a fun romp.
June 2, 2010
I can just see Heinlein as a teenager, hiding under his blanket and playing with his wand, astronomy textbooks splayed all around him with their covers spread wide. This is a guy who may just get his astrobation on more than Arthur C Clarke.
Herein lies the tale of three teenaged boys who like building rockets and get pulled into an inventor's crazy scheme to build a rocket that can make it all the way to the moon!!!!!!! I know, right? Remember, this is from 1947, so when this puppy came out, this idea was so "out there" quite a few publishers rejected it based on its outlandishness.
But Heinlein got it published, and began his illustrious decade of juvinile novels, followed by his Golden Period starting with Starship Troopers. This morphed into his Creepy Old Man period, which was unfortunately the last period he had. If my reliable sources (wikipedia and Aerin) are reliable, his Creepy Old Man period's primary themes are incest, time travel, incest, free love, incest and incest.
That being said, this book is less fun than the other two I've read by him so far. The primary reasons for this are the vague characterizations of the children and the sheer level of technical sense-o-wonder scenes: "They connected the A-Valve to the primary submodilator, which sent a combustion of zinc fibers up the right chamber of the whozawhatsee, which created a reaction that used reverse gravitational magnetism to propell the rocket forward." Imagine paragraphs like that. That's my made up version of the technoporn going on here; perhaps the stuff he's coming up with in this book means something. I'm not scientifically minded enough to know.
But the end does a lot to redeem the lackluster first 100 pages. ***SPOILER ALERT FOR REST OF THE REVIEW*** You see, when they arrive on the moon, they find the remnants of a moon people civilazation...which is cool enough...but THEN...they find...NAZIS! AAAAAH!
Although World War II is over, a small group of Nazis are camped out on the moon with some big-ass bombs, ready to initiate Project Nuke The Good Guys. Our crew has to use their brilliance to out-think the Nazis if they ever want to make it back to Earth.
One thing I loved here was the fact that the children did everything important. The scientist got scared when he was trying to land the ship and one of the kids had to do it. The kids had to defend them against the Nazis because the adult got knocked unconscious. The kids also came up with a lot of the most brilliant ideas. So, this book sense the message to kids that, by cooperating with both adults and other kids, they can do huge and important things, like fly to the moon and kill Nazis.
Would I read it again? Sure. It took all of two hours, and it had its fun parts. Would I recommend it? Uhhh....as a cultural artifact, it's quite amusing. Nothing like reading old SF to see how continually surprising and hard to predict scientific progress can be.
*******
(Since the original review got a vote, it hasn't been deleted. It has just been pushed down here.)
I suppose this is going to spoil the book's one big surprise for you, but I imagine it's the only way to get you to read a juvenile from the forties about a (GASP!) trip to the moon. So here it comes, big spoiler alert.....drumroll......NAZIS MADE IT TO THE MOON BEFORE US! AAAAAAH! And it's up to three meddling kids to stop their evil schemes!
Real review coming up. I'm too A.D.D. this morning to formulate more than one paragraph of cohesive thought at once.
Herein lies the tale of three teenaged boys who like building rockets and get pulled into an inventor's crazy scheme to build a rocket that can make it all the way to the moon!!!!!!! I know, right? Remember, this is from 1947, so when this puppy came out, this idea was so "out there" quite a few publishers rejected it based on its outlandishness.
But Heinlein got it published, and began his illustrious decade of juvinile novels, followed by his Golden Period starting with Starship Troopers. This morphed into his Creepy Old Man period, which was unfortunately the last period he had. If my reliable sources (wikipedia and Aerin) are reliable, his Creepy Old Man period's primary themes are incest, time travel, incest, free love, incest and incest.
That being said, this book is less fun than the other two I've read by him so far. The primary reasons for this are the vague characterizations of the children and the sheer level of technical sense-o-wonder scenes: "They connected the A-Valve to the primary submodilator, which sent a combustion of zinc fibers up the right chamber of the whozawhatsee, which created a reaction that used reverse gravitational magnetism to propell the rocket forward." Imagine paragraphs like that. That's my made up version of the technoporn going on here; perhaps the stuff he's coming up with in this book means something. I'm not scientifically minded enough to know.
But the end does a lot to redeem the lackluster first 100 pages. ***SPOILER ALERT FOR REST OF THE REVIEW*** You see, when they arrive on the moon, they find the remnants of a moon people civilazation...which is cool enough...but THEN...they find...NAZIS! AAAAAH!
Although World War II is over, a small group of Nazis are camped out on the moon with some big-ass bombs, ready to initiate Project Nuke The Good Guys. Our crew has to use their brilliance to out-think the Nazis if they ever want to make it back to Earth.
One thing I loved here was the fact that the children did everything important. The scientist got scared when he was trying to land the ship and one of the kids had to do it. The kids had to defend them against the Nazis because the adult got knocked unconscious. The kids also came up with a lot of the most brilliant ideas. So, this book sense the message to kids that, by cooperating with both adults and other kids, they can do huge and important things, like fly to the moon and kill Nazis.
Would I read it again? Sure. It took all of two hours, and it had its fun parts. Would I recommend it? Uhhh....as a cultural artifact, it's quite amusing. Nothing like reading old SF to see how continually surprising and hard to predict scientific progress can be.
*******
(Since the original review got a vote, it hasn't been deleted. It has just been pushed down here.)
I suppose this is going to spoil the book's one big surprise for you, but I imagine it's the only way to get you to read a juvenile from the forties about a (GASP!) trip to the moon. So here it comes, big spoiler alert.....drumroll......NAZIS MADE IT TO THE MOON BEFORE US! AAAAAAH! And it's up to three meddling kids to stop their evil schemes!
Real review coming up. I'm too A.D.D. this morning to formulate more than one paragraph of cohesive thought at once.
July 26, 2025
Of all the Heinlein juvenile novels (well, of the ones that Dad owned, or that they had at the local public library), this is the one that I read the least. And revisiting it now for the first time in ... 45 years? Probably something along those lines ... I can kind of see why. It's not that it's a bad book; it's just that there's not very much there there.
EDIT: I exaggerated. Looks like I last read the book in 2005, so I guess only 20 years? But that doesn't change any of my conclusions.
This one was first published in 1946, so must've been written in the immediate aftermath of WWII. It takes place at least a few years in the future, at least relative to when it was written (so probably 60-70 years in our past; as I recall, the only concrete date mentioned is 1951, when they're talking about an event that happened in the past relative to the events of the book). Heinlein doesn't really go deeply into the background of the setting -- that's not why we're here -- but apparently the UN has been established as a sort of supreme power (although nations still exist, as long as they don't try to wage war on each other) and trans-oceanic or trans-continental rockets are fairly common but nobody has gone to the Moon yet.
Hence our story, which actually reminds me in some ways of nothing so much as The Wonderful Flight to the Mushroom Planet, except that I assume all of the orbital mechanics, thrust/weight ratios, etc., have been worked out in much greater detail.
As we open, our three protagonists, Ross, Art and Morrie (all just out of high school) are out in the countryside conducting some fairly large-scale (and not entirely successful) rocketry experiments when Art's uncle Donald Cargraves (a veteran of the Manhattan Project) shows up and recruits them for his next project -- buying a surplus mail rocket, outfitting it with a thorium reactor for the drive, and heading off to the Moon. Which plan, needless to say, the boys enthusiastically support; their parents, perhaps less so.
And so out to the New Mexico desert for a good bit of engineering (and some apparent attempted sabotage by Bad Actors) prior to liftoff and then the whole thing ends with the discovery of a Nazi base on the Moon (promptly taken out of commission) and evidence that the Moon once housed intelligent beings of its own.
I think it may also be the shortest of his juveniles? So I'm not going to say don't read it if you're in the mood for that kind of thing and have a few hours to kill (and have a reasonably high tolerance for "folksy" dialogue), but know that you could do better with, well, pretty much any of his later juveniles. (Personal favorites include but are not limited to Space Cadet, Red Planet and Citizen of the Galaxy.)
EDIT: I exaggerated. Looks like I last read the book in 2005, so I guess only 20 years? But that doesn't change any of my conclusions.
This one was first published in 1946, so must've been written in the immediate aftermath of WWII. It takes place at least a few years in the future, at least relative to when it was written (so probably 60-70 years in our past; as I recall, the only concrete date mentioned is 1951, when they're talking about an event that happened in the past relative to the events of the book). Heinlein doesn't really go deeply into the background of the setting -- that's not why we're here -- but apparently the UN has been established as a sort of supreme power (although nations still exist, as long as they don't try to wage war on each other) and trans-oceanic or trans-continental rockets are fairly common but nobody has gone to the Moon yet.
Hence our story, which actually reminds me in some ways of nothing so much as The Wonderful Flight to the Mushroom Planet, except that I assume all of the orbital mechanics, thrust/weight ratios, etc., have been worked out in much greater detail.
As we open, our three protagonists, Ross, Art and Morrie (all just out of high school) are out in the countryside conducting some fairly large-scale (and not entirely successful) rocketry experiments when Art's uncle Donald Cargraves (a veteran of the Manhattan Project) shows up and recruits them for his next project -- buying a surplus mail rocket, outfitting it with a thorium reactor for the drive, and heading off to the Moon. Which plan, needless to say, the boys enthusiastically support; their parents, perhaps less so.
And so out to the New Mexico desert for a good bit of engineering (and some apparent attempted sabotage by Bad Actors) prior to liftoff and then the whole thing ends with the discovery of a Nazi base on the Moon (promptly taken out of commission) and evidence that the Moon once housed intelligent beings of its own.
I think it may also be the shortest of his juveniles? So I'm not going to say don't read it if you're in the mood for that kind of thing and have a few hours to kill (and have a reasonably high tolerance for "folksy" dialogue), but know that you could do better with, well, pretty much any of his later juveniles. (Personal favorites include but are not limited to Space Cadet, Red Planet and Citizen of the Galaxy.)
February 7, 2025
رمان کوتاهی ست پیش از جنگ جهانی دوم درباره سفر به ماه.علم هوافضا در این کتاب به خوبی برای دوران طلایی سفرهای فضایی در دهه پنجاه و شصت میلادی پیش بینی شده بود اگر چه نظام سیاسی به گل و بلبلی که هاینلاین تصور میکرد اتفاق نیافتاد.فضای کتاب نوجوانانه است و یک بار خواندن آن اشکالی ندارد چون نثر تمیز و شست و رفته ای دارد.
March 18, 2011
This was Robert A. Heinlein's first full-length novel. It's one of his "juveniles," which is another way of saying it's rollicking "golly gee whiz"-style adventure that could have just as well been published in Boy's Life magazine as in hardcover by Scribner's.
Three high school seniors on the cusp of graduation get the opportunity of a lifetime when one of their uncles, Dr. Cargraves, a nuclear physicist, is so impressed with their scientifically minded tinkering that he offers to take them with him to the moon for a little expedition.
The premise may seem silly, but Heinlein does a good job of making the characters seem serious, and he sticks to accepted science of the mid-'40s when described space flight and rocketry.
The trio of 18 year-old boys and Dr. Cargraves establish a base on the moon (an airtight Quonset hut), and claim it for the United Nations. They'll soon discover, however, that a bunch of dirty Nazis -- in hiding since the end of World War II -- have already established a base on the moon, from which they plan to mount atomic attacks against the earth.
The climactic action (and the revelation about prehistoric inhabitants of the moon) is probably the silliest section of the book, but overall I really enjoyed Rocket Ship Galileo. It still instilled a sense of wonder and excitment in me, even though it was published more than 60 years ago.
On a side note, this is the first audiobook I've listened to in a long, long time, and I enjoyed Spider Robinson's narration. He's more nasal than most voice artists, but he tells the story very well, and his boyish, adenoidal twang added something to the "gee whiz" aspect of the story.
Three high school seniors on the cusp of graduation get the opportunity of a lifetime when one of their uncles, Dr. Cargraves, a nuclear physicist, is so impressed with their scientifically minded tinkering that he offers to take them with him to the moon for a little expedition.
The premise may seem silly, but Heinlein does a good job of making the characters seem serious, and he sticks to accepted science of the mid-'40s when described space flight and rocketry.
The trio of 18 year-old boys and Dr. Cargraves establish a base on the moon (an airtight Quonset hut), and claim it for the United Nations. They'll soon discover, however, that a bunch of dirty Nazis -- in hiding since the end of World War II -- have already established a base on the moon, from which they plan to mount atomic attacks against the earth.
The climactic action (and the revelation about prehistoric inhabitants of the moon) is probably the silliest section of the book, but overall I really enjoyed Rocket Ship Galileo. It still instilled a sense of wonder and excitment in me, even though it was published more than 60 years ago.
On a side note, this is the first audiobook I've listened to in a long, long time, and I enjoyed Spider Robinson's narration. He's more nasal than most voice artists, but he tells the story very well, and his boyish, adenoidal twang added something to the "gee whiz" aspect of the story.
November 23, 2014
It's easy to dismiss the pre-1965 sci-fi books as "quaint" when read from today's understanding of science and space travel. However these 1940-1960 works are the gems of the golden age.
If you can suspend your 21st century hubris and read the story from a mindset of a 1950s reader, Rocket Ship Galileo holds up as a great read. The storytelling is strong, and is a classic representation of the style of the era. When read with an open mind, it also provides the unexpected enjoyment of getting a glimpse of the perspective and imaginative mindset of the pre-space generation on what science, politics and our exploratory future might look like, with an unintended aspect of nostalgia for today's reader.
An easy read. An enjoyable read. For fans of the genre and of Heinlein, a recommended read and a richly presented fantasy tale.
If you can suspend your 21st century hubris and read the story from a mindset of a 1950s reader, Rocket Ship Galileo holds up as a great read. The storytelling is strong, and is a classic representation of the style of the era. When read with an open mind, it also provides the unexpected enjoyment of getting a glimpse of the perspective and imaginative mindset of the pre-space generation on what science, politics and our exploratory future might look like, with an unintended aspect of nostalgia for today's reader.
An easy read. An enjoyable read. For fans of the genre and of Heinlein, a recommended read and a richly presented fantasy tale.
July 11, 2020
Lunar Shocker: Nazis have secret base on the moon! "Fortunately, a trusty group of teenagers were able to save the day."
Heinlein demonstrates mastery with writing stories for adolescents.
Heinlein demonstrates mastery with writing stories for adolescents.
November 19, 2015
What can I say? This book epitomizes everything that is right, and everything that is wrong, with young adult fiction. Especially, young adult fiction written by Robert Heinlein.
The basic plot: three high school boys (interested in science and engineering, but well rounded and NOT ANTI-SOCIAL NERDS) get an offer to help one boy's uncle -- the noted Nobel Prize Winning physicist and self-made businessman -- to go to the moon. They work through all their technical setbacks, and eventually blast off to great acclaim. But are they the first to reach the moon? Or has a dark, sinister group beaten them there...
The wrongs: there are no female characters in the book. None. Zero. Nada. One of the characters has a mother, but she has one line, in which she contradicts her husband. Yes, it's quite possible that this was a marketing decision. Back in the late 1940s, science fiction was nearly exclusively a boys club. "Why dilute your core demographic," I could hear some modern-day book packager ask. "You know how these nerd boys are on the subject of girls, seeing as how they've never spoken to one their entire lives." But still, geez, give us a female radio operator, shop clerk, something.
The wrongs: If Isaac Asimov's timing is correct, Robert Heinlein was entering his deeply libertarian phase now. What the hell is it about libertarian authors that they feel they have to stop the story to lecture us about how wonderful libertarianism is? Show, don't tell, says every fiction instructor, everywhere. And the topics! It was during the lecture about "How do you know there's an unseen side to the moon?" that I was certain the boys were going to maroon Uncle Don in the crater Tycho.
BUT, there's also a lot right with the book:
The rights: The book was written by an American right after World War II, so it is relentlessly optimistic. In recent (2015) years, it sometimes feels that the only Young Adult science fiction is dystopian. I seriously wonder if the lack of "big science fiction ideas" is hurting our increasingly science-fictional society. Heinlein had no such worries. Remember, he had just come from an experience in which 19 year olds piloted multi-million dollar bombers over enemy territory. It was a small leap to expect these 19 year olds to pilot a ship to the moon.
The rights: strangely enough, the non-didactic portions of the book were probably the most instructive. Heinlein does what a novelist is supposed to do: he shows us, rather than tells us, how the team ran into setbacks with their plan, but thought (and experimented, and worked) their way back on track. Essential teachings for any scientific-technological endeavor.
The rights: Space Nazis!!!!!!!! You can't go wrong with space Nazis!
The basic plot: three high school boys (interested in science and engineering, but well rounded and NOT ANTI-SOCIAL NERDS) get an offer to help one boy's uncle -- the noted Nobel Prize Winning physicist and self-made businessman -- to go to the moon. They work through all their technical setbacks, and eventually blast off to great acclaim. But are they the first to reach the moon? Or has a dark, sinister group beaten them there...
The wrongs: there are no female characters in the book. None. Zero. Nada. One of the characters has a mother, but she has one line, in which she contradicts her husband. Yes, it's quite possible that this was a marketing decision. Back in the late 1940s, science fiction was nearly exclusively a boys club. "Why dilute your core demographic," I could hear some modern-day book packager ask. "You know how these nerd boys are on the subject of girls, seeing as how they've never spoken to one their entire lives." But still, geez, give us a female radio operator, shop clerk, something.
The wrongs: If Isaac Asimov's timing is correct, Robert Heinlein was entering his deeply libertarian phase now. What the hell is it about libertarian authors that they feel they have to stop the story to lecture us about how wonderful libertarianism is? Show, don't tell, says every fiction instructor, everywhere. And the topics! It was during the lecture about "How do you know there's an unseen side to the moon?" that I was certain the boys were going to maroon Uncle Don in the crater Tycho.
BUT, there's also a lot right with the book:
The rights: The book was written by an American right after World War II, so it is relentlessly optimistic. In recent (2015) years, it sometimes feels that the only Young Adult science fiction is dystopian. I seriously wonder if the lack of "big science fiction ideas" is hurting our increasingly science-fictional society. Heinlein had no such worries. Remember, he had just come from an experience in which 19 year olds piloted multi-million dollar bombers over enemy territory. It was a small leap to expect these 19 year olds to pilot a ship to the moon.
The rights: strangely enough, the non-didactic portions of the book were probably the most instructive. Heinlein does what a novelist is supposed to do: he shows us, rather than tells us, how the team ran into setbacks with their plan, but thought (and experimented, and worked) their way back on track. Essential teachings for any scientific-technological endeavor.
The rights: Space Nazis!!!!!!!! You can't go wrong with space Nazis!
December 5, 2018
Morrie, Art, and Ross are teens that just graduated high school and are ready to go to technical university in the fall. They are highly advanced science students who've been experimenting with rocket technology as long as they can remember. Their test launch for Starstruck V goes horribly wrong and explodes hitting Art's nobel prize winning Uncle Cosgraves. But Cosgraves is highly interested in the technology they've evolved on their own and they set out to make a trip to the moon. First they go to a secure location in New Mexico to build their rocket, the Galileo, and then to plan their trip. But spies seem to be messing with their plans and they've no idea why.
Heinlein is a fantastic author. He has a way of building excitement even in a young adult novel. I was brought back to my experience of the first time I watched the film The Explorers as a kid in the 80s. This kickstarted my love of science fiction and space travel in particular. Especially the idea of doing the impossible, like the very first trip to the moon. Heinlein has at least a rudimentary understanding of rocket sience, chemistry, physics and astronomy as it plays heavily in his narrative.
I found it hilarious when they talk about the theories surrounding the moon. For example, what's on the back side. No one's seen the backside of the moon so there may not even be a back side. One of the boys had a theory that "moon people" must have gotten into an atomic war to make the moon look the way it does because things like meteors wouldn't wreak such havoc. This quote sent me into a fit of giggles: "They blew their atmosphere off and the seas boiled away." My very favorite part was when Cosgraves referenced flat earthers and the ridiculousness of that theory. I wanted to say, well its 57 years later and we're still dealing with those idiots.
Overall, I highly enjoyed this book. It has all the elements of an exciting adventure: space travel, science, and spies. I was pulled in immediately and felt my heart racing with excitement as they made these new discoveries and took this perilous journey. It made me feel that joy and newness of exploration beyond imagination. I can't wait to read more of his work. I give this a very strong 5/5 and highly recommend it to fans of sci fi.
Heinlein is a fantastic author. He has a way of building excitement even in a young adult novel. I was brought back to my experience of the first time I watched the film The Explorers as a kid in the 80s. This kickstarted my love of science fiction and space travel in particular. Especially the idea of doing the impossible, like the very first trip to the moon. Heinlein has at least a rudimentary understanding of rocket sience, chemistry, physics and astronomy as it plays heavily in his narrative.
I found it hilarious when they talk about the theories surrounding the moon. For example, what's on the back side. No one's seen the backside of the moon so there may not even be a back side. One of the boys had a theory that "moon people" must have gotten into an atomic war to make the moon look the way it does because things like meteors wouldn't wreak such havoc. This quote sent me into a fit of giggles: "They blew their atmosphere off and the seas boiled away." My very favorite part was when Cosgraves referenced flat earthers and the ridiculousness of that theory. I wanted to say, well its 57 years later and we're still dealing with those idiots.
Overall, I highly enjoyed this book. It has all the elements of an exciting adventure: space travel, science, and spies. I was pulled in immediately and felt my heart racing with excitement as they made these new discoveries and took this perilous journey. It made me feel that joy and newness of exploration beyond imagination. I can't wait to read more of his work. I give this a very strong 5/5 and highly recommend it to fans of sci fi.
June 7, 2022
This is one of my favorites among the juveniles. It is often the Heinlein novel that I suggest to someone new to him. One trait I've noticed several times is that Heinlein will take something that sounds like a parody of bad sci fi and then make it completely and totally possible. Very early in his life in a letter, rather than in fiction, he talked about the implausible mapping of human culture onto aliens as a form of laziness in writing and then parenthetically says, "Some day, I should write a novel about a Martian named 'Smith'." With no hint of irony or self-parody, this of course becomes his most famous and probably most-loved novel.
Similarly, Rocket Ship Galileo has Space Nazis. Space Nazis! Not just in some vague, metaphorical sense. I mean "New Reich" swastika wearers found in space. And it is done completely plausibly and makes for a great yarn.
The novel has all the normal treats of a Heinlein juvenile. We have earnest, young characters committed to take the world by the tail and shake it. They team up with a gruff older guy and take the world, or perhaps I should say moon, and the Space Nazis by storm.
2013: The kids loved this one. Though this ended up being the third Heinlein I read with them, it had been the one I had originally intended to be first, thinking it a perfect introduction. It was a perfect continuation.
2015: This has become only the second re-read with kids. They barely remember it, and have no idea what is to happen. With the notably exception of The Star Beast, they seem to have mostly forgotten the first Heinlein we read. It came off extremely well with the kids. It is funny to me that at 9 and 7, they're starting to find the juveniles a little too thin. They want deeper stories with richer characters. They've found some of that in Heinlein's later work already, and are craving more. Our family reading may soon need to stretch beyond Heinlein.
Similarly, Rocket Ship Galileo has Space Nazis. Space Nazis! Not just in some vague, metaphorical sense. I mean "New Reich" swastika wearers found in space. And it is done completely plausibly and makes for a great yarn.
The novel has all the normal treats of a Heinlein juvenile. We have earnest, young characters committed to take the world by the tail and shake it. They team up with a gruff older guy and take the world, or perhaps I should say moon, and the Space Nazis by storm.
2013: The kids loved this one. Though this ended up being the third Heinlein I read with them, it had been the one I had originally intended to be first, thinking it a perfect introduction. It was a perfect continuation.
2015: This has become only the second re-read with kids. They barely remember it, and have no idea what is to happen. With the notably exception of The Star Beast, they seem to have mostly forgotten the first Heinlein we read. It came off extremely well with the kids. It is funny to me that at 9 and 7, they're starting to find the juveniles a little too thin. They want deeper stories with richer characters. They've found some of that in Heinlein's later work already, and are craving more. Our family reading may soon need to stretch beyond Heinlein.
May 16, 2015
Not a bad read. It's one of the Heinlein "teen' books that I missed when i was younger. AND this one does read a bit younger than some of hie other youth books.
This is the story of young people who get to participate in a private moon shot. One of the more interesting parts of the book (for me anyway) is the dated science. This is a pre-computer, pre-minaturization book and that gives an interesting (did I already use that word?) look at earlier science fiction.
This is the story of young people who get to participate in a private moon shot. One of the more interesting parts of the book (for me anyway) is the dated science. This is a pre-computer, pre-minaturization book and that gives an interesting (did I already use that word?) look at earlier science fiction.
May 10, 2022
Obviously did not release in the 21st century
September 21, 2011
Ok the first thing to remember was that was written in 1947 - before any form of space flight let alone man on the moon. Next accept that this was written in the true boys own adventure style - where a phone call to a far away store can secure anything - from atomic material to a second hand rocket ship and finally accept that its all left to the men to do the science and college students at that!
If you can accept all this wait till you see what they discover on the moon, it was a fun slice of science fiction history but even by Heinlein standards (which i am sure there are many out there who want to criticise) this was dated and not so inspiring piece but still it was fun to read.
If you can accept all this wait till you see what they discover on the moon, it was a fun slice of science fiction history but even by Heinlein standards (which i am sure there are many out there who want to criticise) this was dated and not so inspiring piece but still it was fun to read.
November 24, 2020
This was one of the first Heinlein novels I read as a 13- or 14-year-old, back in the 1980s, and I recall that it (along with Red Planet and Space Cadet) kindled my love not only for science fiction but for science itself, and the broader universe around us. Upon rereading in 2020, it was much as I remembered — not award-winning, but fun. And fun is, afterall, the reason I read fiction.
(I published a longer review on my website.)
April 9, 2021
Showing it's age
This Heinlein's first "Juvenile" science fiction book, written in 1947. It appears to be set in the mid-to-late 1950s, which is about the same era I read it for the first time.
Three boys just out of high school team up with an eccentric atomic scientist to build an atomic-powered moon rocket on the cheap.
It's a rip-roarin' adventure with an interesting plot complication near the end, but the science and engineering haven't aged well.
Not one of Heinlein's best.
This Heinlein's first "Juvenile" science fiction book, written in 1947. It appears to be set in the mid-to-late 1950s, which is about the same era I read it for the first time.
Three boys just out of high school team up with an eccentric atomic scientist to build an atomic-powered moon rocket on the cheap.
It's a rip-roarin' adventure with an interesting plot complication near the end, but the science and engineering haven't aged well.
Not one of Heinlein's best.
June 19, 2013
Originally reviewed at FanLit:
http://www.fantasyliterature.com/revi...
When I was a kid I loved the “Heinlein Juveniles.” Rocket Ship Galileo, Heinlein’s first Juvenile, is one I missed back then. It won’t hold up well today (actually, it wouldn’t have held up well when I was reading Heinlein Juveniles in the 1980s) but sometimes it’s fun to read these old science fiction stories for kids and I did have fun recently reading Rocket Ship Galileo even though I am very much aware of its flaws. Let’s remember that it was published in 1947, just after World War II and well before we managed to put a man on the moon.
Ross, Art, and Morrie (I love those retro names!) are three teenage boys who love science and each have special geeky skills. When Morrie’s uncle, a Nobel Prize-winning nuclear physicist, discovers that the boys are building a rocket ship, he gives them some funds and a little help and off they all go to the moon. When they get there they discover that they’re not the first ones there. The humans who’ve covertly come before have dangerous plans. Can the boys stop them before the bad guys destroy the Earth?
Okay, that’s just fun, right? In the year 2013 it’s impossible to take Rocket Ship Galileo seriously. I don’t know if they did back in 1947. I suspect not because I doubt anyone thought it was possible to build a space ship in your backyard or to mail order space suits and asbestos shoes. Still, boys can dream, and Rocket Ship Galileo is definitely an exciting dream, especially when you get to not only fly to the moon, but kill Nazis and save the Earth on top of it all. Too cool!
Other than the outlandishness of it all, the main problem with Rocket Ship Galileo is all the teachy technobabble. Some of it is real science, some of it is made up (I hope kids can tell this apart), most of it is dated, and a lot of it is boring because it’s delivered in Uncle Cargraves’ lessons or the boys recitation of what they’ve previously learned. Heinlein has an issue with this in his adult novels, too. If the lessons don’t turn kids off they might enjoy experiencing the fantasies of teenage boys in the 1940s.
The audiobook I listened to was narrated by Spider Robinson who has the tone just right. When he narrates the boys’ parts he sounds appropriately wide-eyed, innocent, and geeky. Golly, Mr. Robinson, great job!
http://www.fantasyliterature.com/revi...
When I was a kid I loved the “Heinlein Juveniles.” Rocket Ship Galileo, Heinlein’s first Juvenile, is one I missed back then. It won’t hold up well today (actually, it wouldn’t have held up well when I was reading Heinlein Juveniles in the 1980s) but sometimes it’s fun to read these old science fiction stories for kids and I did have fun recently reading Rocket Ship Galileo even though I am very much aware of its flaws. Let’s remember that it was published in 1947, just after World War II and well before we managed to put a man on the moon.
Ross, Art, and Morrie (I love those retro names!) are three teenage boys who love science and each have special geeky skills. When Morrie’s uncle, a Nobel Prize-winning nuclear physicist, discovers that the boys are building a rocket ship, he gives them some funds and a little help and off they all go to the moon. When they get there they discover that they’re not the first ones there. The humans who’ve covertly come before have dangerous plans. Can the boys stop them before the bad guys destroy the Earth?
Okay, that’s just fun, right? In the year 2013 it’s impossible to take Rocket Ship Galileo seriously. I don’t know if they did back in 1947. I suspect not because I doubt anyone thought it was possible to build a space ship in your backyard or to mail order space suits and asbestos shoes. Still, boys can dream, and Rocket Ship Galileo is definitely an exciting dream, especially when you get to not only fly to the moon, but kill Nazis and save the Earth on top of it all. Too cool!
Other than the outlandishness of it all, the main problem with Rocket Ship Galileo is all the teachy technobabble. Some of it is real science, some of it is made up (I hope kids can tell this apart), most of it is dated, and a lot of it is boring because it’s delivered in Uncle Cargraves’ lessons or the boys recitation of what they’ve previously learned. Heinlein has an issue with this in his adult novels, too. If the lessons don’t turn kids off they might enjoy experiencing the fantasies of teenage boys in the 1940s.
The audiobook I listened to was narrated by Spider Robinson who has the tone just right. When he narrates the boys’ parts he sounds appropriately wide-eyed, innocent, and geeky. Golly, Mr. Robinson, great job!
August 8, 2020
This book was about an after school high school boys' club making a rocket spaceship and going to the moon in it. Seriously.
Heinlein had a hard time finding a publisher for this book. It was rejected several times for being too far-fetched before it was finally accepted. It's also a juvenile. Some juveniles can be appreciated equally by adults. This book can't, and never could have been. It was written solely to appeal to kids.
That it's a book only boys could enjoy is a problem because I don't think there exists a 21st century boy who could possibly find reading this book worthwhile. Boys no longer interact with one another, if they ever truly did, the way these boys do. That means the book has no audience today.
So why did I read it? Purely for historical interest. It has a little of that, but then, everyone knows this book's tropes even in our time, how in the late-1940s the Cold War was beginning. Fears the Nazis would resurrect themselves provided easy fiction fodder, and Heinlein doesn't miss a cliche in this forgettable tripe. The only reason it gets three stars rather than two is because the plot still holds together. The book has a beginning, middle, and end. Some modicum of suspense is successfully created. It's not a bad novel; it just isn't any longer good either.
Heinlein had a hard time finding a publisher for this book. It was rejected several times for being too far-fetched before it was finally accepted. It's also a juvenile. Some juveniles can be appreciated equally by adults. This book can't, and never could have been. It was written solely to appeal to kids.
That it's a book only boys could enjoy is a problem because I don't think there exists a 21st century boy who could possibly find reading this book worthwhile. Boys no longer interact with one another, if they ever truly did, the way these boys do. That means the book has no audience today.
So why did I read it? Purely for historical interest. It has a little of that, but then, everyone knows this book's tropes even in our time, how in the late-1940s the Cold War was beginning. Fears the Nazis would resurrect themselves provided easy fiction fodder, and Heinlein doesn't miss a cliche in this forgettable tripe. The only reason it gets three stars rather than two is because the plot still holds together. The book has a beginning, middle, and end. Some modicum of suspense is successfully created. It's not a bad novel; it just isn't any longer good either.
December 29, 2017
There are two stars here but I actually enjoyed it more than the rating indicates, because it was exactly what I needed to read these days. A "Chums of Chance" style of adolescent story, outdated, obnoxious and kind of silly because, well, we went to the moon and it was nothing like that. It's not great, but if you are in the mood for it and you don't mind the outdated flaws, you will enjoy this, how could you not, there are Nazis on the moon and moon people and adolescent boys fighting for freedom and they also cook a nice meal on their way to the moon, go away NASA with your pre-packaged food and safety precautions...
July 24, 2008
From Heinlein's early days, when he put out some fun adventures. Well before he got preachy.
September 5, 2011
gee willikers! This teen fiction from 1947 is really showing its age.. I enjoy Heinleins fiction, but this one is not his best. Worth reading since it is short and shows more of a bygone era.
January 31, 2021
Since I have already looked at Space Cadet, the second of Heinlein's juveniles, I’ve decided to review them all from Rocket Ship Galileo to Podkayne of Mars (I will be counting Podkayne of Mars since it was originally published as a juvenile, and I have had it recommended to me here, although apparently many, including Heinlein himself, do not count it as one of his juveniles).
Rocket Ship Galileo tells the story of three boys who build rockets as a hobby (no date is given but I would guess it is meant to be somewhere late in the sixties since all the adult characters remember ww2 well but the boys were apparently born after it was finished). When one of their uncles, a leading Atomic Scientist, visits them they are recruited into his project to privately convert a surplus international passenger rocket into a craft capable of reaching the moon. This whole idea, of Space Travel on a shoestring budget done by a bunch of amateurs, is so ridiculous but also so appealing that I couldn’t help but be delighted. The first half of the story, where the ship his made, was a pleasure to read.
We also got some interesting worldbuilding. Heinlein always seems very interested in the politics and society that his stories are based in even if that is not the main point of the story and he has the skill of including it in the background in a way that does not feel either info-dumpy or unnatural. This is a world in which control of nuclear weapons has been given to the UN police due to a realisation after ww2 that another war would destroy mankind. Once again we see the idea of the necessary transformation of society that nuclear weapons would produce that Heinlein first discussed in Solution Unsatifactory. We get several discussians of this and the way society has changed since ww2. (By the way are this story and Space Cadet meant to be in the same universe? I know a lot of Heinlein’s stories are part of a single future history and I know that Space Cadet is part of it but I haven’t seen any confirmation of whether or not Rocket Ship Galileo is included? One could definitely imagine the Patrol of Space Cadet as a development of the UN police of this story.)
The second part of the book was where it fell apart. The division is actually pretty similar to Space Cadet with a long build up and a shorter period of adventure at the end. However, in Rocket Ship Galileo the payoff really doesn’t feel worth it. Upon landing on the moon the explorers find they have been beaten to the punch by a bunch of Nazi’s who have been secretly plotting as part of an international society ever since the end of ww2. The boys and Cargraves foil the dastardly plot of the Nazi’s and return to earth.
Now granted this was published immediately after the end of ww2 when the idea that the Nazi’s might successfully pull off some sort of international resistance might have seemed more plausible. But it all seems rather ridiculous. Also, rather disappointing. The first half of the story really emphasised the notion of the mission to the moon as a romantic quest pursued for the sake of adventure and the good of Science. I would have preferred that idea be continued on the moon but they are to busy having a rather mediocre action adventure. They also discover the remnants of a long dead civilisation on the Moon which they speculated may have destroyed itself and the Luna atmosphere in a nuclear war. Something interesting could be done with this but we are too busy fighting Nazi’s to do so.
A few passages that caught my attention.
"…The Nazis were few in number, but they represented some of the top military, scientific, and technical brains from Hitler’s crumbled empire. They had escaped from Germany, established a remote mountain base, and there had been working ever since for the redemption of the Reich. The sergeant appeared not to know where the base was; Cargraves questioned him closely. Africa? South America? An island? But all that he could get out of him was that it was a long submarine trip from Germany.
But it was the objective, der Tag, which left them too stunned to worry about their own danger. The Nazis had atom bombs, but, as long as they were still holed up in their secret base on earth, they dared not act, for the UN had them, too, and in much greater quantity.
But when they achieved space flight, they had an answer. They would sit safely out of reach on the moon and destroy the cities of earth one after another by guided missiles launched from the moon, until the completely helpless nations of earth surrendered and pleaded for mercy."
I find it interesting that this idea of the elite of the Nazi’s escaping (in a submarine no less) with various wonder weapons and secretly plotting revenge in some remote location was current so early. The idea of a secret Nazi moon base in very popular in the more paranoid recesses of the internet today. I note, however, that Antarctica, a staple of such conspiracies today, is never mentioned (neither thankfully is a hollow earth).
"As a matter of fact he was impressed. It is common enough in the United States for boys to build and take apart almost anything mechanical, from alarm clocks to hiked-up jaloppies. It is not so common for them to understand the sort of controlled and recorded experimentation on which science is based."
This is one of those lines that really makes me wonder about the way society has changed. Do modern children still fiddle around with physical technology and mechanical stuff? I don’t really think they do or at least not to the old degree. Part of it might be the fact that modern technology is such much more difficult to take apart and fiddle with even if it isn’t built to make it deliberately impossible. And part in probably just the increased control and lower tolerance for risk taking in children that exists today. I have to admit it worries me and makes me wonder about things like the great stagnation and the fact that technological advances might be slowing and why that might be. But this probably isn’t the place to discuss this and besides I’m too young to talk like this.
“…Have you any idea how much it would cost to do the research and engineering development, using the ordinary commercial methods, for anything as big as a trip to the moon?”
“No,” Art admitted. “A good many thousands, I suppose.”
Morrie spoke up. “More like a hundred thousand.”
“That’s closer. The technical director of our company made up a tentative budget of a million and a quarter.”
Behold, the optimism of pre-Space Age science fiction. That’s about 16.6 million dollars in todays money. The actual Apollo program, for the record, cost 25.4 billion dollars or over 150 billion in today’s money (estimates vary a little but they are all around that point).
Cargraves took a deep breath. “I have nothing against the Russians; if they beat me to the moon, I’ll take off my hat to them. But I prefer our system to theirs; it would be a sour day for us if it turned out that they could do something as big and as wonderful as this when we weren’t even prepared to tackle it, under our set-up. Anyhow,” he continued, “I have enough pride in my own land to want it to be us, rather than some other country.”
This book was written in 1947 when the cold was not yet clearly a thing to everyone and Heinlein has imagined a world in which the Soviet Union and the United States have worked well enough together to agree to the UN taking control of all nuclear forces and abolishing war. Only a few years later things would be a lot more tense.
“Not any place in the same county—or the next county. How would you like to be in a city when one of those things goes off?”
Ross shook his head. “I want to zig when it zags. Art, they better never have to drop another one, except in practice. If they ever start lobbing those things around, it ’ud be the end of civilization.”
“They won’t,” Art assured him. “What d’you think the UN police is for? Wars are out. Everybody knows that.”
"You know it and I know it. But I wonder if everybody knows it?”
“It’ll be just too bad if they don’t.”
"Yeah—too bad for us.”
Once again we have the idea of a sort of world international police with complete control over nuclear arms. I understand that the idea of the UN as a genuine world government was taken quite seriously in the immediate aftermath of ww2. Indeed the USA even made a proposal of surrendering its control of nuclear power to an international agency in the Baruch plan. Had that gone ahead then we might live in a world very like that envisioned by many science fiction writers and dreamers of the time. If it had actually been able to enforce its monopoly that is.
This book isn’t nearly as good as Space Cadet. Looking around it seems that this is a fairly universal opinion and it is generally thought of as the weakest of Heinlein’s juveniles. I still enjoyed the first two thirds though. A very fun concept even it is somewhat unrealistic. It has interesting worldbuilding that is a curious glimpse of attitudes in the immediate post-war period when the shock of the Atomic bomb had shaken everyone. Just a shame that it couldn’t deliver on its promise once it reached the Luna surface.
Rocket Ship Galileo tells the story of three boys who build rockets as a hobby (no date is given but I would guess it is meant to be somewhere late in the sixties since all the adult characters remember ww2 well but the boys were apparently born after it was finished). When one of their uncles, a leading Atomic Scientist, visits them they are recruited into his project to privately convert a surplus international passenger rocket into a craft capable of reaching the moon. This whole idea, of Space Travel on a shoestring budget done by a bunch of amateurs, is so ridiculous but also so appealing that I couldn’t help but be delighted. The first half of the story, where the ship his made, was a pleasure to read.
We also got some interesting worldbuilding. Heinlein always seems very interested in the politics and society that his stories are based in even if that is not the main point of the story and he has the skill of including it in the background in a way that does not feel either info-dumpy or unnatural. This is a world in which control of nuclear weapons has been given to the UN police due to a realisation after ww2 that another war would destroy mankind. Once again we see the idea of the necessary transformation of society that nuclear weapons would produce that Heinlein first discussed in Solution Unsatifactory. We get several discussians of this and the way society has changed since ww2. (By the way are this story and Space Cadet meant to be in the same universe? I know a lot of Heinlein’s stories are part of a single future history and I know that Space Cadet is part of it but I haven’t seen any confirmation of whether or not Rocket Ship Galileo is included? One could definitely imagine the Patrol of Space Cadet as a development of the UN police of this story.)
The second part of the book was where it fell apart. The division is actually pretty similar to Space Cadet with a long build up and a shorter period of adventure at the end. However, in Rocket Ship Galileo the payoff really doesn’t feel worth it. Upon landing on the moon the explorers find they have been beaten to the punch by a bunch of Nazi’s who have been secretly plotting as part of an international society ever since the end of ww2. The boys and Cargraves foil the dastardly plot of the Nazi’s and return to earth.
Now granted this was published immediately after the end of ww2 when the idea that the Nazi’s might successfully pull off some sort of international resistance might have seemed more plausible. But it all seems rather ridiculous. Also, rather disappointing. The first half of the story really emphasised the notion of the mission to the moon as a romantic quest pursued for the sake of adventure and the good of Science. I would have preferred that idea be continued on the moon but they are to busy having a rather mediocre action adventure. They also discover the remnants of a long dead civilisation on the Moon which they speculated may have destroyed itself and the Luna atmosphere in a nuclear war. Something interesting could be done with this but we are too busy fighting Nazi’s to do so.
A few passages that caught my attention.
"…The Nazis were few in number, but they represented some of the top military, scientific, and technical brains from Hitler’s crumbled empire. They had escaped from Germany, established a remote mountain base, and there had been working ever since for the redemption of the Reich. The sergeant appeared not to know where the base was; Cargraves questioned him closely. Africa? South America? An island? But all that he could get out of him was that it was a long submarine trip from Germany.
But it was the objective, der Tag, which left them too stunned to worry about their own danger. The Nazis had atom bombs, but, as long as they were still holed up in their secret base on earth, they dared not act, for the UN had them, too, and in much greater quantity.
But when they achieved space flight, they had an answer. They would sit safely out of reach on the moon and destroy the cities of earth one after another by guided missiles launched from the moon, until the completely helpless nations of earth surrendered and pleaded for mercy."
I find it interesting that this idea of the elite of the Nazi’s escaping (in a submarine no less) with various wonder weapons and secretly plotting revenge in some remote location was current so early. The idea of a secret Nazi moon base in very popular in the more paranoid recesses of the internet today. I note, however, that Antarctica, a staple of such conspiracies today, is never mentioned (neither thankfully is a hollow earth).
"As a matter of fact he was impressed. It is common enough in the United States for boys to build and take apart almost anything mechanical, from alarm clocks to hiked-up jaloppies. It is not so common for them to understand the sort of controlled and recorded experimentation on which science is based."
This is one of those lines that really makes me wonder about the way society has changed. Do modern children still fiddle around with physical technology and mechanical stuff? I don’t really think they do or at least not to the old degree. Part of it might be the fact that modern technology is such much more difficult to take apart and fiddle with even if it isn’t built to make it deliberately impossible. And part in probably just the increased control and lower tolerance for risk taking in children that exists today. I have to admit it worries me and makes me wonder about things like the great stagnation and the fact that technological advances might be slowing and why that might be. But this probably isn’t the place to discuss this and besides I’m too young to talk like this.
“…Have you any idea how much it would cost to do the research and engineering development, using the ordinary commercial methods, for anything as big as a trip to the moon?”
“No,” Art admitted. “A good many thousands, I suppose.”
Morrie spoke up. “More like a hundred thousand.”
“That’s closer. The technical director of our company made up a tentative budget of a million and a quarter.”
Behold, the optimism of pre-Space Age science fiction. That’s about 16.6 million dollars in todays money. The actual Apollo program, for the record, cost 25.4 billion dollars or over 150 billion in today’s money (estimates vary a little but they are all around that point).
Cargraves took a deep breath. “I have nothing against the Russians; if they beat me to the moon, I’ll take off my hat to them. But I prefer our system to theirs; it would be a sour day for us if it turned out that they could do something as big and as wonderful as this when we weren’t even prepared to tackle it, under our set-up. Anyhow,” he continued, “I have enough pride in my own land to want it to be us, rather than some other country.”
This book was written in 1947 when the cold was not yet clearly a thing to everyone and Heinlein has imagined a world in which the Soviet Union and the United States have worked well enough together to agree to the UN taking control of all nuclear forces and abolishing war. Only a few years later things would be a lot more tense.
“Not any place in the same county—or the next county. How would you like to be in a city when one of those things goes off?”
Ross shook his head. “I want to zig when it zags. Art, they better never have to drop another one, except in practice. If they ever start lobbing those things around, it ’ud be the end of civilization.”
“They won’t,” Art assured him. “What d’you think the UN police is for? Wars are out. Everybody knows that.”
"You know it and I know it. But I wonder if everybody knows it?”
“It’ll be just too bad if they don’t.”
"Yeah—too bad for us.”
Once again we have the idea of a sort of world international police with complete control over nuclear arms. I understand that the idea of the UN as a genuine world government was taken quite seriously in the immediate aftermath of ww2. Indeed the USA even made a proposal of surrendering its control of nuclear power to an international agency in the Baruch plan. Had that gone ahead then we might live in a world very like that envisioned by many science fiction writers and dreamers of the time. If it had actually been able to enforce its monopoly that is.
This book isn’t nearly as good as Space Cadet. Looking around it seems that this is a fairly universal opinion and it is generally thought of as the weakest of Heinlein’s juveniles. I still enjoyed the first two thirds though. A very fun concept even it is somewhat unrealistic. It has interesting worldbuilding that is a curious glimpse of attitudes in the immediate post-war period when the shock of the Atomic bomb had shaken everyone. Just a shame that it couldn’t deliver on its promise once it reached the Luna surface.
April 16, 2018
This was Heinlein's first novel published in book form, and the first in his excellent "juvenile" series which included Space Cadet, Time For The Stars, Starman Jones, The Star Beast, Tunnel In The Sky, etc., and it is still my all-time favorite. Heinlein manages to make believable the tale of a scientist (Dr. Cargraves) organizing three 18-year-old boys of a rocket club to build a nuclear powered moon rocket. If you have an interest in space travel you'll get sucked in and won't put the book down until it's over, no matter how dated and unlikely the premise at first appears. It is written with Heinlein's usual skill (that earned him four Hugo awards), and the characters are easy to identify with, especially for any young space enthusiasts. This was also the basis for the 1950 classic film Destination Moon, although about all that remains unchanged in the film is the name Dr. Cargraves. In the book there is a veiled threat from unknown enemies that turn out to be Nazis (this was the first thing Heinlein wrote after the war) - in the film there's just a veiled reference to a communist threat. I suspect the film also draws from Heinlein's more sophisticated treatment from the same period, The Man Who Sold The Moon.
On 6 October 1988, after Robert Heinlein's death, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) awarded him the NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal:
"In recognition of his meritorious service to the Nation and mankind in advocating and promoting the exploration of space. Through dozens of superbly written novels and essays and his epoch-making movie Destination Moon, he helped inspire the Nation to take its first step into space and onto the Moon." -- James C. Fletcher, Administrator, NASA
No true Heinlein fan should be without an original Scribner's hardcover edition of Rocket Ship Galileo, with the same cover and illustrations as the first edition.
On 6 October 1988, after Robert Heinlein's death, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) awarded him the NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal:
"In recognition of his meritorious service to the Nation and mankind in advocating and promoting the exploration of space. Through dozens of superbly written novels and essays and his epoch-making movie Destination Moon, he helped inspire the Nation to take its first step into space and onto the Moon." -- James C. Fletcher, Administrator, NASA
No true Heinlein fan should be without an original Scribner's hardcover edition of Rocket Ship Galileo, with the same cover and illustrations as the first edition.
November 29, 2021
One of the novels that took off from the WWII era of rocket technology - thinking that a single-stage rocket can conduct a Earth-to-Moon orbit transfer and surface landing on both bodies. What's more amazing was that Heinlein imagined rocket technologies to be simple enough that it would be the next "home garage" project so prevalent in American households back then. Granted, he was thinking of nuclear-powered rockets (thorium reactors) and a generally smarter populace, but what was more intriguing was his notion that "trip to the moon" would "never be achieved by any governmental body due to the sheer lack of practical benefits it would provide." Coming from the post-Kennedy era, such sentiment is almost sacrilegious, but it really shows how public interest in space was not a "natural" phenomenon and had to be "created/educated."
Plot-wise, it seemed all too cliche until things got VERY interesting right after that.
Plot-wise, it seemed all too cliche until things got VERY interesting right after that.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 327 reviews