A good read to familiarize yourself with an angle of the Argentinean/South American economic life. The book succeeded to deliver a bit of its title promise “a feminist reading of debt”. I say a bit because it delivered feminist and debt. I disagree it delivered a “reading” but more of a “a feminist statement of debt”. Reading promises an analysis, a wide perspective, a challenge, an interest and then a conclusion. This book delivered one sided narratives of stories and concluded the result with almost zero analysis or engagement.
In the end, it feels like a justified feminist scream of the struggles of Argentinean women and a shout out celebration of some success stories.
I was pondering to rate the book based on content only (2) or give it a 3 to boost the legitimate cause despite the content. This was before I read the interview section. However, reading the “questions” in the that sections felt so lame, shallow, directed and extracting sympathy. (not even empathy) I had hoped for deeper more analytical, objective questions that walks the reader through an unknown territory. As an example on those questions, this was the last question in the interview section: “so the role of the bank was only to make threats, as well as the bank collects the bills?”. The book failed to engage me with the analysis (there was none), yet, it succeeded to give me little information about the struggle in south America. It is such a shame the book didn’t rise to the expectation.