This book is very strangely intriguing even for people who aren't majoring in Visual Arts. The way it moves from one topic to another, one historical era to another, and most importantly from one form of art to another is very swift and easy.
There's a bit of a positive bias towards literally all art movements mentioned, which may be a good thing or a bad thing but it seemed like the writers had absolutely no negative view on any historical art movements, they do provide counterarguments by critics at the time but when giving an opinion on any given movement it's something along the lines of "impressive; creative; groundbreaking; cutting edge" despite a lot of these movements being rather lame and not as significant as advertised in the book, at least in my very humble biased opinion. That doesn't mean that there are any factual inaccuracies, the opposite really; everything seems revised and thought out well. At the end of the day, art is subjective and everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
For a book that's full of chronological historical anecdotes and art theory and jargon, it is rather surprising that the book is not in the least boring at all. I've enjoyed every bit of it.