I have returned to these Plato Dialogues for the first time since college, though for some reason we were never assigned the Euthyphro, which I now ranks as my favorite dialogue by far. For more than the others Plato/Socrates seems to be pointing at the potential emptiness of the concepts he is interested in. You can also see just how annoying Socrates might well have been in person. Some 38 years on after my first encounter with the Apology and the Crito also stood up well; although, I just don't think I had the knowledge to assimilate their arguments properly or to understand their broader significance. The Symposium and the Phaedo wore less will, once one got beyond their somewhat different appeals to recognize the importance of inquiry, in large part because I just don't buy into the concept of pure forms and the arguments for the immortality of the soul have never done much for me. In particular, Diotima's explanations to Socrates did little for me beyond her point that desire/love is not an external thing located in the cherished person/item but lies within. Beyond that what struck me as rather discordant was the way both the Symposium and Phaedo are framed, as recalled experiences, something that seems at odds with Plato's emphasis on the philosopher's need to break away from imitation in order to uncover the true forms of concepts.