What do you think?
Rate this book


288 pages, Paperback
First published November 15, 2023
primary takeaway: a must for any fan;
aligned w J.W. Rinzler and Secret History of SW
🎬 “According to Charley Lippincott, Stan Lee initially turned down the Star Wars/Marvel project, until he learned that Alec Guinness would be appearing in the film. After further negotiations about the number of issues to be released prior to the film’s release, Marvel—encouraged by editor Roy Thomas—agreed to produce three comic books before the film’s debut. They would be written and drawn by Thomas and Howard Chaykin, respectively. Production began immediately.”
🎬 George Lucas might have been holding on to his Wookiee storyline for quite a while. In July 1976, as author Alan Dean Foster was working on the novelization of Star Wars, he had a brainstorming session with Lucas and Lippincott that was recorded on audio tape. Years later, Lippincott transcribed the tape....
Lucas suggested this “big old journal” have “a big, fuzzy storybook quality” to temper the “hard-edged steel sort of science fiction.” He imagined the older Wookiee telling the baby, “Well, now, Uncle Chewbacca brought this back from his adventures, just before he died.”
“What do you think of something like that?” Lucas asked Alan Dean Foster, who said he would give it a try.
Foster still vividly recalls the discussion. “I didn’t think it was a good idea. And I tried to…do a little sidestep."
In the long run, they didn’t use that Wookiee storytelling device story element in Foster’s novel, “but that idea remained in [Lucas’s] head, and it seems that it was the seed for the Holiday Special.”
🎬 One would think that having a moniker like Charles Lippincott’s “The Star Wars Guy” would be flattering at the offices of Lucasfilm, particularly in the summer of 1977, just months into the jaw-dropping run that Star Wars was on at the time. But for Lucasfilm's [first] CEO Charles Weber, Lippincott’s association with Star Wars dated him. “I think the company outgrew him, ” Weber explains of Lippincott’s sudden marginalization. “Lippincott was an outside person. He was never part of the corporate structure."
Referring to (Lippincot) the vice president of advertising, publicity, promotion, and merchandising for the Star Wars Corporation—a man who two years earlier had left working for Alfred Hitchcock to join Lucas’s grassroots efforts—as an “outside person” seems outrageously dismissive. But Weber describes Lippincott's responsibilities as just being those of “a PR guy” whose input was not needed much anymore.
🎬 Lippincott was also slandered (in Dale Pollock's Skywalking), but he chose not to enter into the libel lawsuit against Lucas, instead holding in his bitter resentment for decades. However, as time went on, he learned through public disclosures that Lucas and Kurtz had given out shares of Star Wars profits to other collaborators such as composer John Williams, sound editor Ben Burtt, and the law firm of Pollock, Rigrod, and Bloom.
Holiday Special - Who Dropped the Ball?:
The Welches (TV Musicians) vs. Miki Herman (Lucasfilm PA)
🎬 Miki Herman, Lucasfilm liaison: Ken and Mitzie Welch were in over their heads. They didn’t know how to edit. They would look to myself and Ben Burtt—they would go, ‘Help us… what are we doing?’ It was just like a runaway production for Ken and Mitzie. They just didn’t know how to do it. And it’s unfortunate that they were assigned to be the producers on this, because Smith–Hemion had some top-notch producers. [But] Ken and Mitzie were variety-show producers [who] didn’t know anything about science fiction.”
With all that being said, the question seems fairly obvious: why, as Lucas’s direct liaison—and someone who had been present throughout all of the tapings and edit sessions “to keep [things] as authentic as possible”—didn’t Herman voice any of her many disapprovals during the actual production? Why was the Diahann Carroll segment (or others she disapproved of) allowed to be written in the first place, much less recorded, edited into the show, and broadcast?
Herman defends her decision to not interfere with the production: she was just there to observe. Miki Herman: “Well, we couldn’t, you know, tell them what to do. I mean, that was their project, their show. It was, like, out of control.”
However...Miki Herman says she did go toe-to-toe with the Nelvana producer Michael Hirsch, who was working on the Boba Fett cartoon, and that Hirsch got very upset with her after she looked at the models Nelvana had drawn for each character and insisted Princess Leia should be wearing a belt. “To me, that was really part of her costume,” Herman recalls. “I was there to make sure their costumes were complete.” Hirsch told her it would be tremendously expensive to start over and add the belt, but Herman insisted. “I mean, that was kind of my job—to be there just to make sure everything was complete. And so he went back and they added a belt to her costume."Herman’s reasoning on when to intercede and when not to is a tad inconsistent. Why she felt the need to admonish Nelvana over a belt but neglected to speak out about such glaring issues as the fantasizing Wookiee is confusing.
It is also confusing, given how upset Lucas allegedly was about the Special, that there were no repercussions for Herman, being as she was his eyes and ears on the show. She was the one who could have “phoned home” to report what she was seeing.Jonathan Rinzler: It sounds like the approval systems and what needed to be approved, all that just wasn’t ironed out, because Lucasfilm had never done this kind of stuff before.… That Miki Herman kept her job is a testament to the fact that it probably wasn’t such a big deal. Otherwise, if it’s as bad as everybody says, Miki Herman should have lost her job. And she didn’t.
The difference between ownership and responsibility...🎬 Kyle Newman: It would have been out of character for Lucas to surrender all creative control to someone else. This wasn’t something that he totally pawned off to someone else and said, ‘Go do whatever you want.’ He actually set the train in motion. And while he may not have had the time and manned resources to fully stay focused on it, it did pervert into something else. There’s a difference between ownership and responsibility, and I would say George is culpable in the fact that he set it all in motion. He’s also probably culpable because he then didn’t police it. He had the opportunity to probably review it and edit it before it came out. But he either felt it was too far gone or he thought it was fine, and that’s something he can only answer.
Bonus:🎬 “As soon as Francis Ford Coppola started on The Godfather (1972), Warner Brod exec, Frank Wells called up Paramount and told them about Coppola’s WB debt and that they might as well turn over Coppola’s salary to them. After the tremendous success of the film, Coppola paid back the initial $300,000 but asked Warner to reconsider demanding the additional $300,000 back, noting it was standard procedure for studios to invest in scripts “on spec.” No-nonsense Wells responded that 'a deal's a deal.'
..actually, we now know, curtesy recently released The Path to Paradise: A Francis Ford Coppola Story, that Coppola's charlatan agent, Freddie Fields, assured his client he would resolve the debt amicably, not to worry, and immediately went behind Coppola's back, absconding w $300,000 of the Godfather fee, delivering it directly to WB/Frank Wells on a silver plater. Also, Coppola was 100 correct to ask Wells to rescind the debt since the industry standard towards Development Fees is they're never recalled! That's like paid sabbaticals... Coppola could've spent the money anyway he deemed necessary to their agreement/contract (i.e. producing THX1138, and developing other Zoetrope projects for Warners).
Nevertheless Coppola promptly fired his agent, Freddie Fields.