As stated in a previous review, I am very weary of reading about post-modern and post-Christian topics due to how much I have had to deal with them during my time doing collegiate ministry. However, just because I am tired of it does not make it any less important, and as well it does not mean that I am right in my flippant attitude. I was glad to see that this book was not written in such a way as just talking around the concepts the author was trying to convey but that he gave good anecdotal evidence of them and made the writing palatable.
I have heard similar models talked about before in terms of a scale showing “how Christianized” a person is. Lutz uses this in a very effective way, however, in showing how in many ways, modern para-church ministries are fighting over the small segment of the campus composed of the “m0s and m1s,” those people who have had significant encounters with Christianity and do not need much coaxing (e.g., to join a Bible study.) This segment also appears to be shrinking more as we enter into a more post-Christian culture with little Gospel literacy. One of Lutz’s points is that a good college ministry should not become the “Christian Bubble” on campus. A good college ministry seeks to engage with non-believers frequently.
More than anything, when it comes to this subject, it seems that contextualization is a taboo word. It can conjure good and bad images depending on your experiences in ministry. Predictably Lutz turns to the Mars Hill narrative in the book of Acts to exegete this idea. It was tastefully done and not a copycat of how I have heard it apply to ministries. Lutz is also very candid in admitting that many who read Acts 17 see it as Paul’s worst missionary encounter because of how few converts he makes here.
Nevertheless, Lutz helps the reader see that when we go up on the Mars Hill of our campus and make no disciples, that we are not necessarily failures. These moments are part of the work God is doing. Lutz has seen much of Evangelical college ministry be geared toward instant results and methods rather than putting in earnest uncomfortable work that many times does not seem on the surface to be very fulfilling. I think the example of having the group meet at the “liberal progressive” coffee shop instead of a church building was a great example of trying to contextualize and having the group discuss spiritually probing questions rather than go through the catechism. As well of note is the atheist organization president who asked for prayer, I think as well, is a poignant example of ministers who contextualize.
What is more, is that it is good to see that his philosophy and methods, because they are bare bones and biblically based, are easy to internalize and learn from for people who are working in different ministry contexts. I think this shows that God works through ordinary means and concepts and that the author has a solid understanding of this in that. Overall, a good read, if a bit disjointed at times, that provokes thought on how to reach college students since obviously pizza parties every Friday is not going to work.