It's been sufficiently long since I've walked into a bookstore and picked up a book based off a compelling back cover summary. The process, engaging with the highly self-praising selection of reading a book, proceeds as such:
- See a familiar author, look up the title on GoodReads.
- Find a compelling cover art, look up the author's canon on GoodReads.
- Suggested a book by a well-meaning family member or podcast; research convincing affectations for the book on GoodReads.
If I sniff, the slightest off-brand literature within those intimately carved out pages, I put the book down. Or at the very least, in respect to the author's achievements, or the historical impact of the title, I place it in my want-to-read folder.
Well, I must have done a great job with the above process, because for the past year or so, I've read exactly what I've wanted to read. That was the goal right? I picked a rewarding time to leave the research of historical relevance (Arizona is #48 in the nation for education), authorial intent, and cultural context from the book, as was my compulsory prelude.
I didn't know about the Peach Blossom Paradise Myth. Did this enhance my reading? Did it just leave me with the peripheral side-quest to a "well-trodden narrative" (as per the back of the book's acclaim) didn't find the space for?
Spoiler's ahead. This is more of a discussion than a review. Because here's the short and sweet: It was enchanting. It was a great book. The prose was tidy and efficacious in almost every reach. Simple tellings, yet intelligent descriptions. At no point did the writing ever indulge for too long. The pace is perfectly suited for the author's meditations. Inert waving's of a branch, and the transporting reverberations of a copper basin light the pages with misted valleys. It's really a beautiful read. Inviting already a reread.
Here the writing proposed some healthy modernist touches that I think was the idea for the whole book. I never did have a sense of plot as I was reading. Hidden in connotations, the driving majority of words on the page were reactions to the larger-than-life elements at play around the characters by way of interpersonal dynamics. The Peach Blossom Paradise, the disappearance of the father, the removed dealings of a ruling government, never overshadowed the languid immediate happenings around Puji's residents. Pacing took priority over plot. Details on the underpinnings of each chapter were intimately intuited. While wading for breath in the book's engrossing symmetry of aesthetics, I was experiencing this myth as a child would chase after a butterfly during a soccer match.
The world feels, massive. Inconsequentially heart-breaking. Xiumi strained. She tried all manner of reflexive behaviors to reconstitute her identity, and yet even in suffering, she was demanded grace. The system was insurmountable and the best of her actions seemed to be snuffed out by all sorts of shadowy figures waiting in the midst. Revolutionaries had their shady work, but so also did the government. Journey's that should have taken three days, ended up taking eight. Nights seemed endless and the complexity of circumstance seemed too knotted for undoing in one lifetime. Past and future violated the space of our cursory present to courier sensation. I never let out hope for Xiumi. Though, I never did believe in her. She seemed doomed from the start. Many filial motifs; fate, undead wishes, ancestral piety, never played so cogently as they did for me here. That is not to say I understood these themes, but rather that I believed in their presence. I held out expectation, with trust that if I read with humility, whatever is to be borne from an unfamiliar story, will not be lost onto me. With this patient vision, the peripheral was enough for me. And the ending really tied the book together as any great classical book should.
- Madame Lu was the gumming agent.
Madame Lu understood her place in the chaos. She prayed and exercised all manner of spiritual devices, but only strained as so far as to not lose her livelihood. Letting fate abandon her from her love affair. Respecting the wishes of her teenage daughter to be wedded off and interminably lost to the family. There was only so much Madame Lu could do, and when that end was met, this was a result of uncharacteristic attempt to bargain the house and business to beg for Xiumi's inclusivity.
Lucid, she maintained the business's dealings with the shrewdness of a modern day CEO. The house was tidy, and she never knew a lack of gifts for her visitors. The reader is struck by the extraordinary perception Madame Lu is able to voice while juggling her harvest's misdealing's, caring for Little Thing, nursing for her illness, and reconciling her relationship with her daughter's tumultuous return. A trait Xiumi is later recognized for by her capturers when she deduces the conspiracy for the sale of her family's land during the government's raid. Unlike Zhang Jiyuan who was equally intelligent, Madame Lu didn't turn her nose up from all manner of spiritual experts; In attempting a cure to her husband's diluted psychopathy; acupuncturists, Buddhist monks, Taoist priests, or yin-yang geomancers when organizing her own funeral. While the revolutionaries believed their struggles to be rooted solely in this life, and this government, they were ignorant to the obvious spectral wanderings of the soul and sought to ban them from daily cultural existence. She was the perfect balance to her husband and Zhang Jiyuan. The story's credibility centered around the reasonable being of Madame Lu's decisions. To live with the certainty of physicality, and to respect the dimensions unseen. So when she died, it truly felt like an irreversible loss to Puji. Her death dizzied me more than the failure of the revolution, the whereabouts of Xiumi's father, the health of the Manchurian Dynasty, the remaining eight golden cicadas.
- We always see the world from the point of view of a vulnerable subject.
Usually it's a child--self-evident in their age--other times it's of the enslaved and dead. From Xiumi's perspective, we then listen to Zhang Jiyuan's diary, then back to Xiumi, and only after she has gathered enough revolutionary esteem returning to Puji from Japan, does she drop into the background of the observed. We are told later in the book of her strength of spirit during those educational years abroad. Where the potentiality of her will seemed endless. Those are the pages omitted from this book. From Huajiashe's Xiumi, we are given to young Tiger, watching Xiumi come home. The winter that followed Madame Lu's death was early and cold. The disruption of the estate's lord and the naked vulnerability of Baoshen and Magpie spread to Tiger and Little Thing. Baoshen is mired in organizing Madame Lu's funeral, barely recognizing obvious signs of Tiger's deceits with a hand covering his forehead at the abacus, Tiger escapes in the night. We get a sense that an alive Madame Lu would have sensed his escape and kept him from The Black Dragon Temple. Tiger sleeps with Lilypad and loses his child-like innocence. It's clear now, all manner of hedonistic agendas are able to run rampant without Madame Lu's watch. A cold chill snaps over Puji. Our last narrative perspective lies mostly with Magpie, the least equipped of subjects left in the story to understand the history surrounding Puji. Illiterate for one, unable to read the simple requests of her mute mistress, she is also left stranded by Baoshen and confused as to why anyone revolted against the government in the first place, where the rice came from that saved the village from the famine, and what to do if Xiumi leaves her, as a mistress and as a loving companion.
When the subject of the narration asks "Why?", they are admonished. But we know, by way of literary focus, they intuitively knew. Often we are asked to be invited, rather than understood. Why is Xiumi crying? Why do the farmer's give us money for growing their crops? Effectively we are reading through a 'third-person, first-person reflexivity', telling us plenty of their precocious conscience. We are only waiting, as the vulnerable subject, for the others to show us what they truly know, by what they hold from us. With this, we can feel as if we are reading from the perspective of the vulnerable subjects, but also with the clairvoyance of a patient historian. Often I was lost in the problems of the story, but I never felt reprimanded by a sneering narrator.
- Flowers
Here we are. Imbued with metaphor and symbolism by the academics, poem by the beholders of their beauty, and intimations of virtue by their effected. Everything in this book is bigger than itself. I'm sure the better part of these subtilties are lost on me. There is too much I am missing from the flower motif propagated in almost every chapter. Here I was only able to image the colors, flattened and preserved between glass, see them for their dusted stamens, growing from over the fences. It was enough for me.
It seems fitting to me that the big ideas of the myth passed through a forgettable town like Puji. Opaque tidings were related to us through analogous life cycles of different flowers. All of the world's psychological breadth pervades in this sample village. Along with the narration serving the subject most vulnerable, the resolution matches it's subject. Often major events are already resolved, simplified, and we are left to deal with the pieces that lay scattered. This forced presentation is the will of some grown-up somewhere else who has decided ignorantly on your behalf. We have glimmers of understanding, where we feel seen by this big other, but often times what passes before us is granulated, retrospective, compromising. While the dealing of this world are infinite in their specifications, the machinations are present in all the townspeople. They bear the burden of understanding the tragedy that has befallen them, and also filling in the blanks as to what comes next. They are the empirical data politicians coldly surmise and manipulate.
A quarter of the world lives without hot water. A non-negligible majority of those people live without showers, climate controlled environments, or private living quarters. The yoke of optimizing the modern world is far from their daily musings. Does this mean they are incapable of depression? Does levity fly over their simple heads? Does not corruption, ill-mannered self-sabotage, societal introspection, ambition, hubris, scalding passions, and addiction live in a forgettable agricultural village? It is easy to be fooled living with the idea of modernity, that somehow we have transcended from our agricultural psyche. As was the presence of Ding Shuze in Puji, or the ramshackle libraries containing books like, 'On Plums', there too in those dirt roads live disciplined and highly acute thought taking rarified breaths in study. Villages are the progenitors to the municipalities spackled with infidelity, godly worship, and private creeds. Xiumi not only could see the vision, she brought it's operations to Puji. Her turn from being lost in a grievingly-expansive world, to manipulating it's behavior, did not feel out of place. She contrived to route the rivers of unceasing thought and rich tumult, to run through, and almost destroy Puji. By way of revolution and by way of an actual river.
Placing 'Peach Blossom Paradise' within some literary context, the book would sit in companionship with '100 years of Solitude'. Generational knowledge, fief expansion then loss, sexuality, genetic misgivings, and all fascinating parallels of the sort are present here. The theme that rung clear as a bell for both books was in the omission of rationality for events. Magical, surreal, mundane events divorced from explanation of whether they could happen, but rather that they did happen, and it was of course because of another thing, and here were the other things that this event affected, and so on and so forth. These intersecting highways of empty space fevered a curiosity that faithfully pinged in my head with out loss of resolution until the next time I got to finally resuming the book.
Even with all the praise I could give this book, up until Part Four, I was unsure if I liked the books events/plot? A girl, misunderstood, is thrown into the turmoil of unchaperoned life and ate a raw ugly part of it. And now, she has decided to cast the world that failed her upside down? She picked up the scribbling rabble of an incomplete philosophy that drove her father father mad and her first love murdered? Totally aware of her own hubris, she contorted her life, hometown, and family into the shape of her inchoate intellectual revenge? The narrator seemed to be beating a dead horse over how fruitless communism is through this poor little girl. To me the brutality and sexuality of the book took license of emotion to drive home a presumptive aphorism. Here, the subtlety faded. The book felt pretty, but light because of it.
The last 15% is the incontrovertible, accidental, happenstance, routine, obscurity of reason, tangential passing of time, required to bring this story to it's full hefty beauty. Puji is managing. Key figures are lost. Scandals have passed through the town. Natural and Non-natural disaster ripped the land in two. Pressure to continue cheeriness, festival, ambition and ceremonial wisdom feel like caricatures of the real thing we first experienced in the beginning of the book. Part four passed the history of events through a Higg's Field of significance. The lost subtlety in the progression of the first three parts is fully redeemed in the last two pages when the author reveals a glimmer of historical locality in the spiritual plane of this myth's wide landscape. The author maintains all the karmic solemnity while betraying no fundamental illusions of the character's limitations. Watching islands, quite gurgling mountain creeks, and blooming flowers materialize in the foreground as the layers of time fold back in on themselves.