I'm disappointed, and I really didn't want to be. This book contained a whole bunch of stories of ghosts, hauntings, and even religious phenomena--now, I can't verify the authenticity of these beliefs, as I don't live in Chicago and in fact have never so much as visited, but I thought this would be a lovely tour of the ghosts of the city. And it was, but it was written so densely--Ursula Bielski seems to fancy herself a scientist, when in fact she's a collector of stories. There is NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT--I picked up this book looking for stories, not examples of the oversealous use of a thesaurus. She also relies heavily on alliteration, which is a great tool in fiction, but just reads as clunky in this sort of book, especially when paired with her aggressively technical writing ("...nestled in a curious and cramped communion" [pg 43], "...most motorists would opt for a glimpse of the glamorous Mary over a near collision with this confrontational corpse" [pg 36], "disgusted by the enduring appeal of a foul and fantastic fairy tale" [pg 158]).
This is all well and good for a thousand-plus-page installment in a thrilling fantasy series, but as I picked up this book hoping for a brief, exciting glimpse into Chicago ghostlore, I just kind of hated hiking through this whole thing. I enjoyed the stories, and I loved the effort Bielski put into finding them and putting them out there, and I respect the amount of research she undoubtedly did for this, but at the end of the day, it just really was not what I was looking for.
I'm a skeptic who likes reading ghost stories (and reincarnation stories, and other fantastical and paranormal things) from the view of a believer--this was kind of that, but also tried way too hard to be credible and just ends up too flowery, too tryhard, and not enough focus on the actual phenomena, more on the backstories (which I also love, but when more of a section is dedicated to the biography of a spirit than the spirit itself, I find myself slipping away).
Oh, and when a cover specifically announces "...even more photos!" I expect the photos to be of allegedly supernatural occurrences--not just of the gates of cemeteries and a dance hall sign and an intersection. Overall, a lovely collection, but I think it was written from the wrong perspective--that of someone trying to sound overly scientific to convince a skeptic of the truth of the happenings, rather than just saying what happened, as it happened, and letting the reader enjoy the phenomena as described.