Anglican Approaches to Scripture: From the Reformation to the Present by Rowan A. Greer

by Rowan A. Greer

Many controversial religious debates of our day center on how to interpret scripture correctly. Is it historical or theological? How do we address contradictions? Greer shows the multi-layered Anglican tradition of what scripture is and how to interpret it.

Genres: Christianity

Paperback

First published April 1, 2006

Reviews

[Phil · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is a good overview of how Anglicans tend to read Scriptures, although the conclusion (or Inconsclusve Conclusion as Rowan Greer calls is) really amounts to there is no one way. For someone who hangs around for any amount of time in Anglican circles, that is hardly a surprising conclusion to make. Any church that can juggle evangelicals and Anglo-Catholic, liberals and conservatives in the same structure is one which is not going to have widespread agreement about how to read anything, much less Scripture. It just isn't going to happen.

Still, it is good to see the varying approaches, particularly with consideration of that three-legged stool of Scripture, reason and tradition we hear so much about in Anglicanism. Clearly, there is a tendency among Anglicans to lean on one leg or the other to the point that one wonders why the stool just doesn't break. Yet, somehow we muddle along.

I also appreciated the insight on the historical-critical method which resonates with my own suspicions about its approach. I particularly enjoyed his comment that 'Liberal Protestant' approach epitomized by the Jesus Seminar fails to convince classicists- being one and being sceptical about some of what I've seen.

I'm a little non-plussed by the deliberate refusal to conclude, but that doesn't necessarily decrease the value of the book.