Explores the skills managers will need as technological and economic forces dramatically change organizational structure in the future, spawning new types of decentralized organizations in which the power to decide belongs to everyone.
I am constantly searching for good books about organizational development, particularly for social movement organizations, of which there are .....well, so far, I haven't found any. So that leads me to the business management section which has millions of offerings, mostly fads, idea or guy du jour, and which can be boiled down into a paragraph or two.
This book is a good one for people who are interested in a thoughtful analysis of possible organization structures and good questions to ask yourself when deliberating when centralizing or decentralizing makes sense, when hierarchy works, and how the communication needs of more horizontal organizations can be tackled.
Наконец-то нашел книгу о преимуществах и недостатках децентрализованных организаций, способах их создания и реализации в разных условиях. У авторов несколько наивная позиция относительно развития децентрализации, но они все равно отлично справились с работой по продвижению этих идей и хорошо их объяснили. Идея со стоимостью передачи информации и влиянии на организацию очень интересна. Отличная идея постоянно сравнивать вертикальные организации с децентрализированными. На контрасте становится понятно, когда лучше использовать одни, а когда другие типы организаций и на чем делать акцент в смешанных.
I thought this book was just excellent. I don't think there were any radical new ideas in the book necessarily but the organization and explanations were amazing. It really compiled and made sense of a lot of information and took a lot of implicit knowledge and made it explicit. As a math guy I can compare it to Euclid and his book Elements Of Geometry: Containing The First Six Books Of Euclid. Like it, this book has some new insights sprinkled with a whole new framework of thinking of the topic.
The basic premise of the book is that organizations (not just companies) have been largely decentralized throughout history and that lowering communication costs will lead businesses to decentralize more in the future. Tom Malone then goes on to catalog the different degrees of decentralizations, different ways to decentralize, and when each one is useful. This is the core part of the book. It is packed with examples of where these things are happening now and where they might happen in the future. The treatment is incredibly complete and thorough. I'm not going to go into all the detail except to say that this book is a must read for any organization looking to lead the way into the future and innovate in new styles of leadership, management and organization
Written 10 years ago this would have seemed more prescient than it does reading it in 2014. The early sections on centralization versus decentralization, flexible versus directive decision structures, applying those principles to internal versus outsourced or "e-Lance" labor, and thinking through the implications for flexible workforce organization and portfolio careers, set up some good ways to organize ones thinking on the topics. It is, perhaps, more grounded and less creative in thinking about this topic than, say, Charles Handy, but practical and useful nevertheless. The book runs out of steam a bit when he gets onto the topics of leadership, culture and communications. It's all worthy stuff and important, for sure, but the latter chapters feel a bit like padding and don't really say anything new. Useful and practical with many good examples of what real companies are doing.
The future of work is about outsourcing and colaboration. The way a movie is made through contractors and many companies working together to build something great is how companies in the future are going to work.
I would love an update on this, just to see how some of the predictions and ideas have been impacted by the 2.0 movement. I was really game on the book until the last couple of chapters when Malone gets just a little too politically left for me to handle.