This is an amazing novel for the tale it tells, for what it says about how the world has changed but most importantly about how deep the roots of the present are in the past. Published in 1957, written by a disillusioned (please see my footnote *1 below) French left wing writer, it is startlingly free of ideological commitment and its clear eyed honest look at the foibles as well as the monstrosities of ordinary people. But interestingly there are no monsters. Both the man who says he likes to rape virgins and the virgin who sees off his attempts to rape are equally free of any morality. What he did, what she does (and I don't simply mean in resisting rape) are all tied up in the 'Law' which is both a particular game that is played in the local cafe but more importantly, of course, a metaphor for the entire way of life in Southern Italy and, with variations, the intellectual salons that Roger Vailland was disenchanted with in Paris.
What Vailland presents us with is a very clear eyed portrait of a small town and society that is a microcosm of the larger world. It is a world that utterly contradicts every cliched norm about Italy as Catholic, family orientated with a reverence for women and children. There is nothing but superstition, greed, petty enmity and hate as well as misogyny that is almost painful to read. It was also a society of people obsessed with status and money which meant more than any family and certainly any friend. There were complex webs of obligation, patronage and dependence but all rested on gradations of power. It was a world built on the horrible unchanging, unrelieved omnipresent poverty of most people. The irony is that it is not family, church or politics that bring change but simple unrestricted or controlled prosperity that is not given, or brought or controlled, only a tidal wave of consumerism.
Interestingly there is no mention of the Church - at the time this novel was written the Catholic Church was in the last days of its post war Byzantine glory as Pius XII moved about his pontifical realm in a cloud of waving peacock fans, incense and young boy choristers. Its obsession with women's clothing (ensuring it was copious and all concealing) was as absurd as it was irrelevant (see my footnote *2 below).
Like all novels that live beyond their time 'The Law' says much not only about Italy but about any other society that has facade that conceals much - and I say that as someone from Ireland, another country where love of family, children and supposed respect for women concealed exactly the opposite. The hypocrisies and unexamined prejudices at the root of this novel are not simply to be found in the way the victims of the Yorkshire Ripper and Dennis Nielsen in the UK were ignored, forgotten and belittled because labelled as prostitutes or rent boys.
A truly brilliant novel that examines human nature with an honesty that is both acute and astounding in its clear sighted acuity.
*1 Vailland was disillusioned with the pieties and hypocrisies of Communist politics after the Soviet suppression of dissent in first, East Germany, and then Hungary.
*2 I have no idea if the Pope or other Catholic grandees like Cardinals and Bishops still pontificate on women's swimwear, or the length of their skirts or the extent of their décolletage as they did, frequently, when I was a child back in the 1960s. But it is noticeable that they never denounced the incredibly short and tight short trousers that continental boys wore until adolescence and they had no problems with incredibly tiny shorts that were the universal sports wear for boys and teenagers at that time. Of course it is only in retrospect that we have learnt how many Catholic priests, bishops and cardinals liked boys not simply in skimpy shorts but no shorts, indeed, no clothes at all.