I hate giving books low marks, but I'm doing it.
This book is about an American teenager living in Milawi.
It's very white centering, not just because of the character being white, but also in terms of how she spends her pages of inner-dialogue.
The good parts of the book are that I think that certain aspects of this story may be true to the experience of someone like the main character. I think the challenge of coming to a new school in a different culture, and trying to develop meaningful friendships were earnestly written about. I think also that the author does a fair job of trying to acknowledge and illuminate some of the challenges that the people in the story face, while still telling keeping it in the scope of the character's life. I think that it's fair too, that as an American author, the author did choose to write from what she knows, rather than contriving a story that is far removed from her own experience. As far as pacing and tone, the story flows well and is easy to read.
The main negative for me is that it's an extremely white-centering story, and I don't quite know what the point of reading a book about Milawi is, if you are just going to read about a white American girl's experience there anyway. I checked out whatever books my library had on Milawi, and this was one of them. It's not the worst book ever, and it's a fast read, I just think it's not really needed.
As far as the white centering goes, right in the beginning the author is having internal grief about some of the physical discomforts of her new environment and leaving her known-life behind. While this is a realistic feeling that a teenager in this situation might face, I feel that it was insensitively written from a self-centered pouty teen's perspective, and I just don't really care. Then main character gets special treatment in school as a white-American-English speaker, and is put in a leadership role at school. This may(??) be a realistic experience (I wouldn't know), but there is very little unpacking of why this would be happening or whether it's good or fair. It fits into the story as though it's just a surprising and remarkable experience for the main character, a situation where she has to demonstrate her grit and competence, as though the assumption is that she can handle anything thrown at her if she just does her best. It smacks of white-saviorism and entitlement. I think on the one hand the character is just thrown into a situation that is over her head because the people she is with may be in an overwhelming situation as well. The character has internal dialogue about why she is overwhelmed, but there is still this underlying assumption that she will be able to pull it off if she just does her best. In another situation the main character's close friends is in grave danger--while there is some poignancy to the way it's written, there's also a bit of emphasis on how will the character save the day, as though the danger is an adventure and not deeply tragic. I mean you have to have serious things happen in a story, if you want to have any plot at all, but it in the end the story is about how the events effect the main character above all else, and how the events effect the main character just seems like the least important thing to care about in the story.
My least favorite line in the book is something about the main character telling her friends "we can be our own saviors" or something like that. It's just so inappropriate in the context, and so explicitly contrived. Without giving too much away, I can just say, the characters are forced into a situation with limited options, and they make a choice for immediate and necessary benefit that is both costly and risky and threatens to do great harm if not resolved, and yet the tools for resolve are out of the children's hands. The inappropriateness is in that the children are dealing with something that is in no way their fault to begin with, where their needs are not being met--due to vast forces outside of their control--such as colonialism and poverty--and the white American girl is encouraging them to be "their own saviors" in something where they actually do NEED outside help and support. It's also inappropriate because the main character has far more resources than her friends. If she wants to do something to improve their situation, she can. If she needs help getting out of trouble, she has it. To impose upon her friends that they should somehow pay for their own suffering on an equal footing as her, is just ridiculous. Not only that, the situation is mostly resolved by the time she encourages her friends to "be their own saviors"--she's moreseo just encouraging them to "pay-back" her dad for helping them out. It's not that the situation needs further resolve, it's just that the main character feels guilty for receiving her dad's help, and basically wants her friends to feel guilty too. Furthermore, her friends are the ones who need help more than she does, her friends are the ones who face the most risk. To try to pressure someone experiencing great loss to pay for something that was taken from them, essentially, rather than just try to help that person, is more than obnoxious. And on top of all of that, it's just too transparent as a plot objective. Okay so, the author wanted to make the kids seem like heroes of their own stories--not only did the story telling fail to accomplish that--but you shouldn't put the exact line in the book to explain what you are trying--and failing--to have your characters do.
Then there is the part of the girl desiring to feel connected to her dead mother. I just feel like it's an attempt at poetry and depth that just falls flat.
The author says she wrote this book so she would have a way to convey her experiences in Malawi to her American students. I don't think it's necessarily wrong that she wrote this book to do that. We all need to tell our stories in different ways. I do think there are a lot of memorable aspects to the book. I think it does better than a book about "oh I was selfish and self-centered and I moved into a country with poverty and loss and I became a better person" --the character doesn't really change much throughout the story. She is self-centered to begin with, but not a "bad" person, still a generally caring person, and she ends the story just as equally self-centered and yet also caring. I imagine it is very difficult to try to pack various overarching themes into a single narrative plot. I just don't see who I would recommend to read a book such as this, other than for the purpose of criticism. I think that if you went through and bullet-pointed different themes and events in the story, you could have a very useful discussion. Even in terms of inter-continental relationships, there's a lot of material here to work with. It's not a bad book in the way of disparaging other people or playing up stereotypes, at least as I can tell. It seems authentic in the sense that it seems like it seems true to the character's own perspective--even if her perspective is skewed. For example, the main character gets a housekeeper in her new residence, and this housekeeper is always cheerful and supportive. Maybe this really would have happened. But it's difficult to just take for granted and let be as a reader. It doesn't really come up whether it's fair or right or normal to have a housekeeper (I'm not saying it's wrong, it just doesn't come up), there is no back story to this character, it's just that the main character needs someone to offer a cheerful greeting, and she gets it. It's like this housekeeper may have been based on a real person, and the character is not quite essential to the plot, but at the same time it's a very flat character and you have to at least question what does it mean for the author to portray this person in such a two-dimensional manner that is all about how they serve her own interests only...In some ways I appreciate the attempt that was made here...This author went to a completely different country than her own, and she wanted to tell people about it, and she wanted to process it, and she tried to bring us with her and she tried to make us care about people she cares about, and those all seem like commendable behaviors...but I don't know how you get around how white-centering the story is.