The Time, Place, and Purpose of the Deuteronomistic History: The Evidence of Until This Day (Brown Judaic Studies) by Jeffrey C. Geoghegan

by Jeffrey Geoghegan

Knowing when and why Israel s earliest national history (the so-called Deuteronomistic History) was compiled is essential for rightly interpreting that history as well as for tracing the development of Israelite religion and culture. Yet the field of biblical studies has never been more divided over these issues. Some argue that the production of Israel's history belongs to the late preexilic period (sixth seventh centuries BCE), when the monarchy still existed and those responsible had access to authentic and, in some cases, fairly ancient sources. Others argue that Israel s history belongs to the late postexilic period (fifth fourth centuries BCE), when those responsible for its compilation had little or no access to actual sources and much of what they wrote was invented in order to justify political structures and territorial claims in Persian-period Yehud or even Hellenistic-period Syria-Palestine. The present study addresses these important questions by analyzing the phrase until this day, which, like similar formulae used by Greek and Roman historians (most famously, Herodotus), was the biblical historian s way of highlighting archaeological artifacts and religio-political structures that existed during the time of his writing. The outcome of this analysis is not only the identification of when and where the biblical historian carried out this enterprise but also what interests--both political and religious--governed his recounting of Israel's past.

Hardcover

First published November 10, 2006

Reviews

[Greg · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a really well written monograph. The author performs a detailed analysis of the "until this day" formula occurring throughout the Deuteronomistic History (DtrH) and convincingly reinforces the dual-redaction hypothesis of Frank Moore Cross, Jr. as amended by Richard Elliott Friedman. It is a useful corrective to the more trendy European monographs dragging the DtrH further into Persian period.

The bibliography covers the gamut of scholarship on the DtrH since the late 19th century, and would be very valuable to a graduate student doing a thesis on the DtrH.