What do you think?
Rate this book
Markets and the Environment
Markets and the Environment is a concise yet comprehensive introduction to a topic of central importance in understanding a wide range of environmental issues and policy approaches. It offers a clear overview of the fundamentals of environmental economics that will enable students and professionals to quickly grasp important concepts and to apply those concepts to real-world environmental problems. In addition, the book integrates normative, policy, and institutional issues at a principles level. Chapters the benefits and costs of environmental protection, markets and market failure, natural resources as capital assets, and sustainability and economic development.
Markets and the Environment is the second volume in the Foundations of Contemporary Environmental Studies Series, edited by James Gustave Speth. The series presents concise guides to essential subjects in the environmental curriculum, incorporating a problem-based approach to teaching and learning.
Markets and the Environment is the second volume in the Foundations of Contemporary Environmental Studies Series, edited by James Gustave Speth. The series presents concise guides to essential subjects in the environmental curriculum, incorporating a problem-based approach to teaching and learning.
288 pages, Paperback
First published June 18, 2007
44 people are currently reading
99 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
December 10, 2013
This was the text for EVSP 502 Environmental Economics.
p. 55. The scale of environmental problems in capitalist economies like the United States often pales next to the devastation wrought in socialist economies like the former Soviet Union.
p. 84. Many people assume that natural resources have infinite value. But economics does not,
p. 86. Stanley Jevons, a renowned nineteenth century British economist, predicted in a book called The Coal Question that as Britain depleted its coal reserves, its economic power would decline precipitously. Jevons failed to account for the fact that an increase in the price of coal would spur the development of alternative sources, new extracting technologies, and greater efficiency in coal use, and he failed to anticipate the rise of oil and natural gas as alternative fuels.
p. 92. When resources are limited, current consumption comes at the cost of foregone potential future consumption. The present value (at the margin) of these foregone future consumption opportunities is marginal user cost, or scarcity rent.
p. 114. Notice that the fishery is economically overfished before it is biologically overfished. This will always be true because fishing is costly.
p. 115. Here again, actors in a market generate costs (fish depletion) that are external to the transactions between buyers and sellers. No individual fisher has an incentive to account for the externality of depletion of the fish stock
p. 136. A tax on pollution equal to the marginal damage at the socially efficient level of pollution will achieve the socially efficient outcome.
p. 137. What is the Optimal Gasoline Tax? . . . They found that the Pigouvian tax reflecting marginal external costs would be eighty-three cents per gallon in the United States. . . . Taxing gasoline, therefore, is just an (imperfect) proxy for taxing miles driven.
p. 138. The marginal cost and benefit functions look an awful lot like supply and demand curves.
p. 139. The role of government policy, then, can be understood as filling in the missing demand curve.
p. 140. In effect, a tax on pollution amounts to charging firms for what they would pollute in the absence of regulations, and then paying them back for every ton they abate. . . . The tax and the cap-and-trade policy are essentially different ways of getting to the same point.
p. 197. Concerns about distributional equity could be addressed by combining drought pricing with income transfers.
p. 198. In contrast, drought pricing involves simply changing the price of water.
p. 199. . . . the "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico, and we have determined that the two main causes are farming upstream of the Mississippi Delta and municipal sewage plant discharge from cities in the delta.
p. 55. The scale of environmental problems in capitalist economies like the United States often pales next to the devastation wrought in socialist economies like the former Soviet Union.
p. 84. Many people assume that natural resources have infinite value. But economics does not,
p. 86. Stanley Jevons, a renowned nineteenth century British economist, predicted in a book called The Coal Question that as Britain depleted its coal reserves, its economic power would decline precipitously. Jevons failed to account for the fact that an increase in the price of coal would spur the development of alternative sources, new extracting technologies, and greater efficiency in coal use, and he failed to anticipate the rise of oil and natural gas as alternative fuels.
p. 92. When resources are limited, current consumption comes at the cost of foregone potential future consumption. The present value (at the margin) of these foregone future consumption opportunities is marginal user cost, or scarcity rent.
p. 114. Notice that the fishery is economically overfished before it is biologically overfished. This will always be true because fishing is costly.
p. 115. Here again, actors in a market generate costs (fish depletion) that are external to the transactions between buyers and sellers. No individual fisher has an incentive to account for the externality of depletion of the fish stock
p. 136. A tax on pollution equal to the marginal damage at the socially efficient level of pollution will achieve the socially efficient outcome.
p. 137. What is the Optimal Gasoline Tax? . . . They found that the Pigouvian tax reflecting marginal external costs would be eighty-three cents per gallon in the United States. . . . Taxing gasoline, therefore, is just an (imperfect) proxy for taxing miles driven.
p. 138. The marginal cost and benefit functions look an awful lot like supply and demand curves.
p. 139. The role of government policy, then, can be understood as filling in the missing demand curve.
p. 140. In effect, a tax on pollution amounts to charging firms for what they would pollute in the absence of regulations, and then paying them back for every ton they abate. . . . The tax and the cap-and-trade policy are essentially different ways of getting to the same point.
p. 197. Concerns about distributional equity could be addressed by combining drought pricing with income transfers.
p. 198. In contrast, drought pricing involves simply changing the price of water.
p. 199. . . . the "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico, and we have determined that the two main causes are farming upstream of the Mississippi Delta and municipal sewage plant discharge from cities in the delta.
March 15, 2023
Markets and the Environment takes multiple different current events, not all exclusively related to the environment, that each merit considerate analyses from economic, geographical, ecological, legal, and moral lenses, and rotely applies the same perverse neoliberal logics to each of these issues, concluding at every turn that all is well as long as "markets are injected into as many places" on earth as possible.
There are a few interesting tidbits in the book––but its weak discussion of concepts such as willingness to pay and its lack of attention to things like linkages, secondary effects, and distributional problems, renders the analysis so shallow that it cannot at all be taken seriously as a piece of rigorous scientific research.
Overall, the book is fine--it is decently written and covers a lot of neat world issues, but it should be taken with many pinches of salt.
There are a few interesting tidbits in the book––but its weak discussion of concepts such as willingness to pay and its lack of attention to things like linkages, secondary effects, and distributional problems, renders the analysis so shallow that it cannot at all be taken seriously as a piece of rigorous scientific research.
Overall, the book is fine--it is decently written and covers a lot of neat world issues, but it should be taken with many pinches of salt.
June 25, 2024
First came across this during my 4000-level Environmental Economics class, but oddly enough I reference the theory in this quite frequently
November 27, 2016
I'm a bit late writing a review for this particular book. This is one that I'll be more than happy to dump from my collection in the future once I knock out the final project in the graduate certificate program I'm in. This book was extremely academic and is not light reading for anyone as far as I can tell. There would be much more interesting things for you to read unless you're reading for work or school. Economics, while important, has got to be the most boring field in existence and adding the word "environmental" before the word "economics" does not do a great deal to make it any better.
I almost rated this two stars but at the last minute had to bump it to three because it wasn't bad as far as textbooks go, it was just terrible as far as reading for fun would go by a normal person's standard.
I almost rated this two stars but at the last minute had to bump it to three because it wasn't bad as far as textbooks go, it was just terrible as far as reading for fun would go by a normal person's standard.
Read
January 19, 2016interesting points about environmental economics, and how natural resources or common goods are handled; taxes and scarcity; all on a micro-economic level. my only criticism is that the writing isn't all that clear to follow, whereas Moshe Adler's book, "Economics for the Rest of Us" felt like it was being read to me.
The last chapter on the macro picture, on economic sustainability, could really reframe the entire book if presented in the beginning chapter(s).
The last chapter on the macro picture, on economic sustainability, could really reframe the entire book if presented in the beginning chapter(s).
Read
April 5, 2009This book is very academic, thus I have a hard time giving it a number of stars...but for a somewhat-textbook it was very good! The authors explained environmental economics from a basic level to a more complex level with many real life examples throughout the book. It can be a good refresher book if you already understand the topic or a good introduction if you don't.
April 3, 2019
This book presents an overview of the application of economics to the solution of environmental issues. It’s focus is on how one develops market-based solutions at the lowest costs to both business and the consumer including those impacted by the problem. The book is concise and comprehensible by those not versed in economics.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews