The Dynamics of Ancient Empires: State Power from Assyria to Byzantium (Oxford Studies in Early Empire)

by Ian Morris

Transcending ethnic, linguistic & religious boundaries, early empires shaped 1000s of years of history. Yet despite the global prominence of empire, individual cases are often studied in isolation. This series changes the debate's terms by promoting cross-cultural, comparative & transdisciplinary perspectives on imperial state formation prior to European colonial expansion. The world's 1st known empires took shape in Mesopotamia between the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea & the Persian Gulf, beginning around 2350 BCE. The next 2500 years witnessed sustained imperial growth, bringing a growing share of humanity under the control of ever-fewer states. 2000 years ago, four powers--Roman, Parthian, Kushan & Han--ruled perhaps 2/3s of Earth's population. Yet despite empires' prominence in the early history of civilization, there have been few attempts to study the dynamics of ancient empires in the western Old World comparatively. Such grand comparisons were popular in the 18th century, but scholars then had only Greek, Latin & Hebrew texts as evidence, & necessarily framed the problem in different, more limited, terms. Near Eastern texts, & knowledge of their languages, only appeared appreciably in the later 19th century. Neither Karl Marx nor Max Weber could make much use of this material. Not until the 1920s were there enough archeological data to make syntheses of early European & W. Asian history possible. But one consequence of the increase in empirical knowledge was that 20th-century scholars generally defined the disciplinary & geographical boundaries of their specialties more narrowly than their Enlightenment predecessors, shying from large questions & cross-cultural comparisons. As a result, Greek & Roman empires have largely been studied in isolation from those of the Near East. This volume is designed to address these deficits & encourage dialog across disciplinary boundaries by examining the fundamental features of the successive & partly overlapping imperial states that dominated much of the Near East & the Mediterranean in the 1st millennia BCE & CE. A substantial introductory discussion of recent thought on the mechanisms of imperial state formation prefaces the five newly commissioned case studies of the Neo-Assyrian, Achaemenid Persian, Athenian, Roman & Byzantine empires. A final chapter draws on the findings of evolutionary psychology to improve understanding of ultimate causation in imperial predation & exploitation in a wide range of historical systems. Contributors include John Haldon, Jack Goldstone, Peter Bedford, Josef Wiesehofer, Ian Morris, Walter Scheidel & Keith Hopkins, whose Roman political economy essay was completed just before his 2004 death.

Genres: History, Ancient History, Politics, Nonfiction, Anthropology, Middle East, Reference

Hardcover

First published December 12, 2008

Reviews

[Erik Graff · Rating 4 out of 5]

Writing reviews of books which assemble articles by a variety of authors is difficult, thorough treatment requiring coverage of each piece. This volume, arising from “a series of conferences sponsored by Stanford University's Social Science History Institute,” brings together several academic disciplines and seven authors in seven essays broadly covering the dynamics of states and empires in the ancient world. The entities focused upon are the Neo-Assyrian, Achaemenid, Athenian, Roman and Byzantine Empires, with substantial excurses into Sparta and the early Islamic Caliphate—a range of about 1500 years. Rather than discussing each contribution in detail, I shall list each and their authors in order, providing short descriptions of their contents.
The introductory essay, “Ancient States, Empires, and Exploitation: Problems and Perspectives” by Jack A. Goldstone (George Mason, Global Policy) and John F. Haldon (Princeton, Byzantine History), is a very broad overview of the topics covered by the conference papers, topics such as state- and empire-formation and consolidation, class composition, ideology and evolutionary theories as regards such polities. The authors promise—and they generally deliver—at least tentative answers to four questions: (1) How did empires come to be? (2) How did they survive? (3) How were they structured? (4) How did their economies function? This introduction is short—only twenty-seven pages—and almost intimidatingly dense. This should not put off the reader. What follows it is easier to assimilate. Indeed, digestion of the material will be served by a re-reading of this essay upon completion of the collection.
Peter R. Bedford's (Union College, Religion) treatment of the Neo-Assyrian Empire follows. The period covered here, ca. 934-ca. 605, represents “the most durable empire seen until then in Western Asia,” a polity with significance in reference to contemporaneous and subsequent formations.
Josef Wiesehöfer's (University of Kiel, Ancient History) discussion of the Achaemenid Empire covers a shorter range, ca. 550-323, but is better sourced. The sources, discussed in enlightening detail, are, however, mostly non-Persian. Indeed, so far as literary sources are concerned, most are Greek, many of them being hostile. Given the proximate cause of Persian collapse being Alexander of Macedon, this slant has its merits and leads, neatly enough, to the next essay.
Ian Morris' (Stanford, Classics and History) piece is unique in that Athens—and Sparta and Syracuse, both treated at some length—was never an empire. This allows the author grounds for a substantive discussion of state—as opposed to empire—formation. Similarly, this essays covers a much narrower range of time, the height of the Athenian mercantile expansion from 478 to the disaster of 404.
Keith Hopkins (Cambridge, Ancient History) concentrates on his specialty, economics, as regards the Roman Empire, focusing on the Principate of 31 B.C.E. through 235, but frequently ranging further afield. I found his critical dismissal of many Roman literary sources in favor of such objective evidences as Greenland ice core samples (used in estimating silver coinage rates) most refreshing.
Haldon's second contribution is misleadingly titled “The Byzantine Empire.” It is actually as much a treatment of early Islamic expansion, the movement which led to the loss and absorption of what had, ca. 330 to 1453, been a major imperial player. Like Hopkins, Haldon concentrates on economic factors, particularly the inability of the Greeks to compete with the rising mercantile republics of Venice, Genoa and Pisa.
The collection ends with an eye-opening piece by Walter Scheidel (Stanford, Classics) entitled “Sex and Empire: A Darwinian Perspective.” Reminiscent of popular works like those penned by primatologist Desmond Morris and much beholden to Sociobiology, this essay focuses on functional viability, sexual exploitation being handled as the original and paradigmatic mode of that dynamic which created civilization and accompanies virtually all modes of sociopolitical aggrandizement. While controversial, this angle is certainly provocative and, as Scheidel amply demonstrates, heuristically productive.
All-in-all this collection is worth study. While the topics and questions mentioned in its introduction are irregularly treated by the contributors, they do run throughout, giving this volume a greater thematic coherence than many such conference-based assemblages. All the essays are intelligent, informed and well-sourced. This book might serve as a primary text for courses in a variety of disciplines.

[Natan Bedrosian · Rating 4 out of 5]

It was an interesting book where the in-depth analytical history of the world's greatest empires- from ancient Chinese empires in the east to Incas and Aztecs in the far west- was studied from different perspectives, ranging from social, historical, and economic factors to cultural and financial one.
However, the most interesting chapter was the last chapter, Walter Scheidel's 'Sex and Empire: A Darwinian Perspective.' This chapter adds a flavour of biology into the deep historical pages and analyses the psychology of imperial apparatus in implementing their policies, especially those that are highly related to emperor(s) sexual pulses such as enslavement of female members of subjugated political entities, the legality of monogamous and/or polygamous marriages, the distribution of enslaved females among imperial dynasties and their soldiers, and the normalisation of cocumbines inside the imperial houses.

[Erik Riker-Coleman · Rating 3 out of 5]

This was a useful book. The best chapters in my view were the ones on the Greeks and Romans, which was a little bit of a disappointment, in that I went in knowing more about them and hoped that I'd gain great new insights on the Neo-Assyrians, Persians, and so on--those sections weren't without value, but they were pretty dry. The book is pretty focused geographically--Near East and Mediterranean--I'd like to see something similar for other regions. One of the later chapters was a creative but murky "big picture" consideration of empire-building as an evolutionary strategy for reproductive success on the part of dominant men in various societies. I think the argument was a bit strained, but the observations about patterns of sexual and gender relations were interesting.

[Jeffrey Cavanaugh · Rating 3 out of 5]

A discussion of the systems of rule and rulership in the ancient empires of the Near East and Western Europe. However, like nearly all edited academic volumes, it lacks consistency of discourse and ranges over many subjects. In particular, although the objective of the volume is to set the stage for a comparative analysis of state power in the ancient world, there is no real attempt to do so systematically across the chapters, and the individual chapter authors are left to range freely in their discussion of a particular empire with little in the way of comparison with what their co-authors have contributed. As a result, one is presented with a potpourri of material that, though individually interesting, does not lend itself to systematic comparison or end-of-tome lesson learning or knowledge building.

[Michael Anderson · Rating 4 out of 5]

Thought Provoking view of the inter-workings of ancient empires.