Simple representations of children that frame what is normative and what is queer are examined in a collection of essays by scholars of childhood and sexuality, including such eminent scholars as Lauren Berlant, Andr Furlani, Judith Halberstam, Ellis Hanson, Paul Kelleher, and others. Simultaneous.
I've only read the Kincaid and Stockton essays so far. it's Super interesting and thought provoking. it's a highly intellectual, critical, and objective way of looking at the ways in which we sexualize children--no political implications no, "it's wrong" or "we shouldn't" but pointing out how weird we are about the topic. Why we "desexualize" children--children are not sexual--but also assume that all children are heterosexual--assinging them sexual desires and behaviors. Stockton's next book (out next year), entirely on Queerness and Childhood, was spawned from her writing this essay.
Like most collections—some pieces fascinating, some utter gobbledygook, some in between. A few were uncomfortable to read, as they apparently condone adult sex with children in some situations. Though I see where these arguments come from, it’s a slippery slope. Nonetheless, many of the chapters were fascinating—a personal favorite was the piece on queer Girl Scouts. Worth a look.
Some insightful essays about reading queer children in literature, and a few "I have no idea what point the author is trying to make but I gotta read this before class tomorrow" essays.