Indulge me for a second. We're going to play a game of literary differentiation. I'll post a few passages from a book below, and you tell me if the passage was written by Todd Hasak-Lowy or David Foster Wallace, author of Infinite Jest.
Ready?
1. Keep in mind that that the guy asking most of the questions sweats a great deal, as in constantly, as in he would cause the makeup/sweat artist for Gatorade ads to fear for his or her job. He sweats so much he long ago stopped paying it much notice, so the sweat simply flows, runs, he perspires freely, wetting his collar, undershirts, tie, even his jacket, which he has kept on for this meeting knowing too well what the sight of wet spots under his arm extending well past his elbows would do to this potential employee.
2. Keith's father died of a heart attack at 2:58 A.M. on a Tuesday morning, so it was officially Wednesday, though in Keith's father's mind it was still Tuesday because he hadn't yet gone to sleep, ot hadn't yet been able to fall asleep, though he had briefly tried a couple hours before he died.
3. I'm hungry. I say to myself, over and over, that word "peckish." I consider the etymology of the term. Does it, like "gnawing hunger," express the way hunger tirelessly tells you you're hungry? Because I am. Hungry, I mean. I got up too early, I underate at lunch. And I'm bored. Whether Ron likes it or not, I'm getting a snack at the break. A naughty snack.
Okay...the answers: All three of these passages were written by Todd Hasak-Lowy. If, for those of you who have read David Foster Wallace before, were compelled to guess "David Foster Wallace" for any of the preceding passages, I want you to know that I understand. I gazed at the author photo for a short time trying to determine if maybe the handsome young man staring back at me might be David Foster Wallace in disguise. I experimented with anagrams of David Foster Wallace to see if any combination led to Todd Hasak-Lowy (they didn't, the "H" presents problems). It seems that these two writers are, in fact, two different people, but you wouldn't know it to read their work.
I enjoyed this book a great deal, being a fan of Wallace myself, and I actually felt slighted when it was over with. I wanted more. I was actually disappointed that the book had ended.
It's a book of short stories, seven of them to be exact. All of them are funny and thought-provoking. But none of them get bogged down in the things that make Wallace's work difficult for some people to read. Footnotes, anyone?
The stories ran the gamut in tone and subject matter. The first one ("On the Grounds of the Complex Commemorating the Nazis' Treatment of the Jews")is a particular highlight, in which a stale pastry in the coffee shop of Israel's Holocaust memorial museum causes a nasty brawl between an American tourist and the Israeli cashier. There's another ("Willpower, Inc.") about a weight loss program in which the obese are teamed up with bodyguards who are trained and instructed to beat the hell out of you if you eat more than your share. There's also the story about a man whose own cures for his own insomnia eventually kill him ("How Keith's Dad Died"). My personal favorite ("The End of Larry's Wallet") starts out as a man's frantic attempts to locate his missing wallet, but eventually descends into a post-modern explanation as to why this story isn't working out like it should.
If you like David Foster Wallace, then read this book. You'll enjoy it a great deal.