ok so i let the overwhelmingly good reviews convince me that this was worth my time despite being YA fantasy romance, a genre that i am definitely too old for and do not particularly enjoy reading, and it: was not! don't convict they caught ME slipping etc. anyway i almost gave this two stars because i typically reserve the one-out-of-fives for the most heinously bad of books and i don't think this was truly like, the worst, but also there was just nothing in it that i enjoyed even the littlest bit, so. will concede that some of my dislike stems from me just not vibing with this kind of book but inasmuch as i can be objective here are some of my #issues and #problems ->
- i found this novel's politics to be supreeeemely unconvincing. this is a fairly common thing especially in YA and double especially in contemporary YA given its tendency to skew more often than not towards easy-to-absorb didacticism, which is... one of the reasons i don't read much YA (the other & biggest reason being that i am one million years old). even still - a novel's politics being a little insipid isn't always a dealbreaker for me, it's often easy enough to disregard as a relatively minor irritant if the plot itself is compelling, but the main problem here is that this book tries very hard to be About prejudice more than it's really About anything else, and it beats you over the head with it from the start without ever actually managing to say anything of substance. this basically tanked the whole book for me not just because of the constant mealy-mouthed liberal sentiment being expressed (WES' ULTIMATE HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD AMBITION: BECOME A POLITICIAN!) but also because it dragged down the worldbuilding SO much - the religious/cultural groups in this are transposed extremely transparently from the real world (sumic = catholic, katharist = protestant, yu'adir = jewish, banvish = irish) and it makes the entire setting feel inauthentic, superficial, and poorly conceived. i've been utterly ruined for YA-adjacent fantasy by authors like tamsyn muir, seth dickinson, katherine addison, all of whom revel in creating incredibly complex worlds to serve as backdrops for their stories; in comparison almost none of this book's universe is shown to the reader except for the bigotry that thrives within it on a social level, all of which is tied inextricably to the real-world historical context that it originates from and makes very little sense without it unless you assume that this fictional world has more or less the same history as ours. and who wants that in fantasy unless it's, idk, satire? a deliberate pastiche/subversion? played straight & with zero nuance it's both flimsy and uninteresting - if i wanted to read about anti-catholic prejudice which quite frankly i never will then i wouldn't be turning to YA fantasy for veiled depthless allusions to it??
- ok this one is slightly more of a me problem vis-a-vis the expectations i had going in but i definitely thought the actual hunt would be more of a focus and as it is it's literally just the last 5% of the book. everything else is setup, angst, and the development of the romance between margaret and wes, which is fine if that's what you're here for but i was here for high octane murder-tournament fun and i did! not! get! it!
- speaking of which, the romance: guh. extremely milquetoast hetero teens can be fine as long as both of them are likeable but imo wes did NOT have the range to pull off the whole lovable charismatic rogue thing. he mostly read to me as immature and self-centred, which ties in with the politics thing too - as i mentioned up above wes' main motivation is to become a politician because his family are poor irish (banvish) catholic (sumic) immigrants escaping, of all things, famine, and he wants to ~change the system from within~ but personally even if i considered that to be a decent solution to systemic problems (it isn't) i would still find it very hard to interpret his longing for political power as a true desire to help enact some form of communal good, largely because he does Fucking Nothing to help anyone else over the entire course of the novel if it doesn't also serve his own interests in some way!!! scream @ how you're supposed to root for his Noble Lofty Goals while he's actively leaving his sisters to work exhausting menial jobs in order to take care of their mother & the household (the gender divide here too.......... man!) - also how he tells margaret that it isn't her job to babysit him and clean up after him/cook for him every night and it's like, okay but do you take it upon yourself to help with any of those things??? no??????? fuck off then!!!!!!!!! good grief WES! ugh!!!
- i also think i might've enjoyed margaret/wes slightly more if the gender dynamic had been reversed to have her as the charming reckless irish rake (stereotype much) and him the restrained & exasperated manager of his absent mother's household. i understand the impulse to have your female characters be the mature & competent ones but i am exceedingly bored of having girls be the Straight Man to a boy's carefree antics; it only serves to make her boring & prudish and him less endearing for his seeming failure to understand the weight of adult responsibilities. plus like Let Women Have Fun 2k22
- the writing is mostly fine with some moments of near-loveliness but also a regrettable number of sentences like 'the next two days pass like honey drizzled from the tip of a spoon.' questionable!
- not to be a giant weenie but i actually found the plot conceit kind of tasteless. the sheer entitlement of killing an ageless mythical creature, quite literally the last of its kind, and using the power derived from it for your own ends? To Help You In Your Goal To Become A Politician (i'm sorry i literally can't get over this)? it's addressed very very mildly in the narrative mostly in the form of examining the meaning of the hala to the different religious groups but i think there needed to be a little more grappling with the implications of it, a little less 'well this is a means to an end so whatever i guess.' or just have them be unrepentant bastards about it! as is it really hit my personal pet peeve of having characters do cunty things while insisting on framing them as Intrinsically Morally Good heroes - this is pussy behaviour, to me !