Dense, difficult, tightly wound and bursting with ideas, this collection of some of Samuel Delaney's short fiction was rough going at times, but mostly rewarded the effort. Like Phillip Dick, this is sci-fi concerned with ideas and implications more than characters or even plots. Some pieces were chock full of giant spaceships and galactic spaceports, while others could have been a tale of fishing out of an obscure Hemingway collection. As one other reviewer wrote here, one gets the sense that Delaney might be working out large ideas that he'd explore further in larger novels. (The circular, hallucinogenic narrative of "Night and the Loves of Joe DiCostanzo" suggests a trial run for "Dhalgren.")
The best story in the book is the novella-length opener, "The Star Pit." Here, Delaney coaxes out more ideas about space travel and the nature of the connected universe than some authors do over an entire career. For most writers, getting to the far reaches of space is a problem solved with the invention of warp drives. For Delaney, it's more subtle and difficult: once a person travels more than 20 light years from their home planet, the arrangement of the stars in the sky, the forces that keep a body in check, become so out of order, it renders a person insane. The only people that can travel to the outer reaches of space are the enigmatically-named golden ("sans noun"). Golden (the term is used for singular and plural) are people who have been so psychologically damaged from abuse or neglect, combined with a natural chemical imbalance, that they feel out of place on their own planet. The ultimate loners, often subjected to further trauma by the government to make sure they are space-ready. Thus, the only people that can see the wildest extremes of the universe are stupid, savage, or both. Delaney is great at pitting character archetypes at one another -- lawbreakers and honest citizens, asexual beings and fetishists, those representing progress and those clinging to old ways -- flashing them to our own times while extrapolating our next fifty years.
"Corona" shows us a world in which pop singers create something closer to Stockhausen than Justin Bieber, and a telepath with no 'off' switch keeps entering people at the most traumatic moments of their lives; "Aye, and Gomorrah" capitalizes on the needs of those working in outer space (radiation will contaminate one's reproductive organs) by creating a class of sexless, romantically stunted subhumans (or perfect humans) who make money as would-be tricks for the most sexually haunted people, people who want them because they cannot give back; "We, In Some Strange Power's Employ, Move On a Rigorous Line" plays out the Rural Electrification Program in the future, where a last bastion of Hell's Angels (now riding hoverbikes) resist a group of techs trying to provide them with mandated electricity. It feels eerily precient as we look at a whole group of people in this country actively resist affordable healthcare because I don't know...they're afraid someone even less deserving will get it, too. "Cage of Brass" and "High Weir" are short character studies, the former resembling Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado," the latter concerning a linguist on Mars who is obsessed with the artifacts of a former civilization.
Then you get relatively straightforward stories like "Dog in a Fishing Net" and the title story, which contain almost no science, no weird tech, and read like short stories from 50 years before. That's not necessarily a compliment. In both cases, I reached the end without having much of a sense of what there was to be taken from it. "Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-Precious Stones" is full of neat ideas and a good sense of how to tell a crime/espionage story, but it never really resolves into much. And as inventive as "Night and the Loves of Joe DiCostanzo" was, it was infuriatingly opaque, like someone trying to tell you about a very personal dream they had. You can get enough to know that it meant a lot to the person who had it, and if they could tell it more clearly, you might enjoy it as well.
That sense of opacity of writing comes up a lot in the book. At first, I assumed that Delaney is a lot smarter than me, and I just wasn't used to reading this deeply. But I don't know. A really smart writer can make some very complex concepts very approachable. This isn't me casting aspersions; I think Delaney writes like this on purpose, and probably could make things more clear if he really wanted to. Sometimes, I just wish he wanted to.