Instant New York Times Bestseller #1 New York Times bestselling author Bret Baier reveals how George Washington saved the Constitution–and the American experiment " To Rescue The Constitution is a masterful exploration of the electrifying struggle to unite a young United States." —Jay Winik A sweeping narrative ranging from the unsettled early American frontier and the battlefields of the Revolution to the history-making clashes within Philadelphia’s Independence Hall, Bret Baier’s To Rescue the Constitution dramatically illuminates the life of George Washington, the Founder who did more than perhaps any other individual to secure the future of the United States. George Washington rescued the nation three first by leading the Continental Army to victory in the Revolutionary War, second by presiding over the Constitutional Convention that set the blueprint for the United States and ushering the Constitution through a fractious ratification process, and third by leading the nation as its first president. There is no doubt that the struggling new nation needed to be rescued—and that Washington was the only American who could bring the together. After the victorious War of Independence, when a spirit of unity and patriotism might have been expected, instead the nation fractured. The states were no more than a loosely knit and contentious confederation, with no strong central union. It was an urgent matter that led to the calling of a Constitutional Convention to meet in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787. Setting aside his plan to retire to Mount Vernon, Washington agreed to be a delegate at Philadelphia. There he was unanimously elected president of the convention. After successfully bringing the Constitution into being, Washington then sacrificed any hope of returning to private life by accepting the unanimous election to be the nation’s first president. Washington was not known for brilliant oratory or prose, but his quiet, steady leadership gave life to the Constitution by showing how it should be enacted. In this vivid and moving portrait of America’s early struggles, Baier captures the critical moments when Washington’s leadership brought the nation from the brink of collapse. Baier exposes an early America that is grittier and far more divided than is often portrayed—one we can see reflected in today’s conflicts.
William Bret Baier is an American journalist and the host of Special Report with Bret Baier on the Fox News Channel and the chief political anchor for Fox. He previously worked as the network's Chief White House Correspondent and Pentagon correspondent.
While I enjoyed this book, like many history buffs on here, it contained very little information that I wasn't already familiar with. However, it does serve as a nice reminder of our country's origins, the founders' original intentions and their fears for the future, their desire for the people of the country to chart the path that the government would follow, rather than the government leading the people.
Unfortunately in this day and age, it doesn't seem as if enough people - especially the ones who claim to be fervent patriots, standing up for their constitutional rights - sadly, these are generally the least-informed citizens; the ones most likely to believe the Constitution is "too long to read"(face palm right there!).
It talks all about Washington and as much verified information as can possibly be given is discussed (considering the fact that such information is so scant, historians have taken to inventing myths about little George - the apple tree ring a bell?). It seems were it not for his solemn character and his reverential devotion to the new nation, we may have never gotten past all the initial bickering over the drafting of the Constitution.
We always owe him an enormous debt of gratitude (lol, authors always thank people this way in acknowledgments, I had to use it!) for ensuring that the transition of power went smoothly, uninterrupted for almost 232 years. I don't know, it was an inspiring book by a news figurehead, who, fortunately, showed no partisan bias. Yet something was lacking for me. Maybe it was the lack of entirely new information/facts, or maybe it was in how the story was told. It wasn't bad; just not my favorite.
However, I wouldn't necessarily take my word for it, as most of my GR friends along with other reviewers have given this a 4 or 5 star rating. I think I'll settle for a comfortable 3, rounded up to a 3.5.
Popular history about George Washington's life and his contribution to the constitution. It seems clear that without Washington, The US probably would not have made it to 1800, let alone the 21 century.
Baier's epilogue discussing today's views on the constitution is right out of the beltway, and can be skipped without missing anything.
Baier has the great ability to convey a sense of history with all its complexities in a clear, understandable way. He proved this in his "To Rescue the Republic: Ulysses S. Grant, the Fragile Union, and the Crisis of 1876." He tackled even more complex, deeply philosophical and practical issues in this work. George Washington proved to be the calm, competent (and, often, just plain lucky) leader of the war against England. Baird traces the creation of the Articles of Confederation and the chaotic conditions that resulted in the new republic. Most interesting, Baird describes the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the clashing philosophies of those favoring a strong central government against those who opposed it, and the gradual coming together on a document that provided incentives for both sides. Through all of this, George Washington was the quiet, solemn, dignified leader around whom all sides gathered. He kept his opinions to himself while he managed to mold and eventually lead a much stronger country. He was a man called by his country many times during his life. Each time, he met the challenges that faced him with calm, dignity, and modesty. Washington as president was ever-aware that all he did was precedent-setting. He surrounded himself with the best thinkers of his day and steered his country through the first peaceful transition of power when he turned over the presidency to his successor, John Adams. This is not a scholarly work and doesn't pretend to be. It does, however, remind us that conflicting opinions are the crux of a democratic republic, that compromise and good will are not evil, and that government is an evolving construct that should ever strive to serve its citizens.
Thank you, Bret Baier for reminding us that the United States has always been arguing with itself. To Rescue the Constitution is the story of how the U.S. was born and immediately started screaming. Whether it was over bigger government, citizenship, or states rights, the U.S. has never lacked for political passion. Baier brings out the Murderers' Row of Founding Fathers but mostly centers on how George Washington is the reason anything got done (mostly).
I will say that for American history super nerds (like myself), you are not going to find any new revelations other than a few smaller fun facts (which are always wonderful). That said, Baier's prose is very easy to read and if you are unfamiliar with the time period, then you will find this book fantastic.
(This book was provided as an advance copy by Mariner Books.)
This is an enlightening and captivating exploration of the crucial role George Washington played in shaping the United States' early years. Baier, known for his expertise in political commentary, delivers a meticulously researched and brilliantly written account that not only educates but also engages readers with its rich narrative. Baier masterfully delves into the complexities of the American Revolution and the birth of a new nation. He skillfully highlights Washington's pivotal decisions and leadership qualities that guided the fragile American experiment towards success. By interweaving historical events, personal anecdotes, and political analysis, Baier brings forth the intricate challenges faced by Washington and his contemporaries, making this book an enthralling read for both history enthusiasts and political junkies alike. What sets this book apart is Baier's ability to humanize Washington, painting a vivid picture of the man behind the myth. He delves into Washington's fears, doubts, and personal struggles, revealing his vulnerabilities and the immense pressure he faced as the first President of the United States. Through this lens, Baier showcases Washington's unwavering commitment to the principles of the Constitution, his dedication to the American people, and his unwavering belief in the democratic experiment. Baier effortlessly navigates through the intricate web of political alliances, rivalries, and ideological debates, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the challenges Washington faced in preserving the Constitution. This is a timely reminder of the importance of strong leadership, constitutional principles, and the perseverance necessary to protect and uphold the foundations of democracy. Baier's book is an indispensable addition to any history lover's collection and a must-read for those seeking a deeper understanding of George Washington's pivotal role in shaping the United States.
To Rescue the Constitution: George Washington and the Fragile American Experiment by Bret Baier is an excellent nonfiction that delves into the imperfect and complex beginning of country as it began to form into the solid nation we know today.
I absolutely loved this book. I know it was nonfiction but it reads as smooth as fiction. Reading this book gave me more of an understanding of the difficulties and obstacles that were present on the bumpy road of a new nation in its infancy and the struggles that were present as George Washington helped mold and sculpt the separate threads into a tapestry of art that evolved into the United States.
I highly recommend this to anyone that enjoys American history.
5/ 5 stars
Thank you NG and Mariner Books for this wonderful arc and in return I am submitting my unbiased and voluntary review and opinion.
I am posting this review to my NG account immediately and will post it to my GR, Bookbub, Amazon, Instagram, and B&N accounts upon publication on 10/10/23 per publisher request.
Brett Baier does a remarkable job of taking you through the early days of our shaky union. He describes both the political and military turbulence that shaped the early days. While doing so, he avoids harboring too much on any specific battle or piece of legislation that can make books like this often cumbersome and more difficult to read.
George Washington is painted as the ideal American. Someone who is constantly asked to serve, and although often reluctantly, never fails to answer the call. Washington is described as the man who floats between the blurred line of humility and self-deprecation. Washington is someone who constantly illuminates their own inadequacies, revealed in his many of his letters to fellow founding fathers. I think in today’s age, we could also use a a leader who recognizes their own shortcomings, rather than one whose repeated arrogance, permits them to claim that they are the only one who could save this nation. Although this statement may be true of Washington, he would never dare say something of the kind.
Additionally, Baier highlights the difficulty of forming a constitution that could shape this nation for 250 years. He illuminates the writings of many founding fathers, including Madison and Jefferson, whom describe the inadequacies and shortcomings of a document that many today consider sacred. It is as if the gospel writers were to say, “well we’re not too sure about this book that we’re writing, and it may need many changes down the line.” Today, many political figures today take pride in their ability to “be in alignment with the constitution” or call something “unconstitutional.” The book points out when Jefferson declares that no one generation might have the right to create a binding government on the next.
Although partisan politics torment our nation, these days, this book shine light on the powerful nature of humankind to sit down, deliberate, and compromise. Baier’s ability to incorporate primary sources with the addition of his own insightful analysis is paramount in creating such a fabulous and digestible story. I would highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the people and principles that helped guide and form the US.
As a history teacher that has taught Washington and the rise of America, this book provides good insight on the time period. It proves to be a great introduction to anyone wanting to learn more about this period of history. Although it covers the storyline that most history buffs are already much familiar with, I still had new information I was able to learn.
The things I enjoyed most about this book was Washington's relationship with his family as well as his call for duty. The man was always ready to stand for his country. Countless times he wanted to do his own thing and chill at Mount Vernon with his wife Martha but he was always convinced to go and serve. He was a sensible man and balanced the hotheads of the period (Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton) nicely.
The Continental Army's failures in the beginning of the war were harsh. The way Washington was able to regroup and find a way to win is inspiring. Even when sometimes his own soldiers were full of doubt of his ability (Thomas Hickey Execution, Conway Cabal). The story of the "Victory or Death" scribble right before the Crossing of the River is as mythical as ever and adds to Washington's legacy.
Although Washington is an American hero, his view on slavery is conflicting and the author does a good job of addressing this.
The reason this review is a four instead of a five is because of how sometimes the writing seemed to flow more like a textbook rather than a story. Telling history as a story is a challenging task and Baier did a solid job. But sometimes I was bored.
Overall good book and tells the history of an iconic time period and person.
Another great popular American History by Bret Baier. A light, easy and informative read but no less serious than by many other academic historians. Basically, a brief biography of George Washington with emphasis on his role in creating a new constitution, "....in order to form a more perfect union....", to replace the existing weak and chaotic Articles of Confederation. Because of his prestige and leadership, Washington was unanimously elected first President of the nascent government. He set much of the precedence for the future of that office. Baier noted that had John Adams or Thomas Jefferson been the first elected, that office could be completely different today. Washington got us off on a good and secure footing.
To go deeper regarding the framers of the Constitution I recommend reading, "The Quartet: Orchestrating the Second American Revolution, 1783-1789", by Joseph Ellis.
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of biographies on George Washington. Bret Baier has done something a little different and built this one strictly around how Washington helped form the document that still advises and inspires millions of people around the world.
He touches a bit on the first President's early life in the French and Indian War, but that phase in his life takes only two short chapters. They reveal the willful youth who made some serious errors (a few historians might call them horrendous mistakes) but learned from them to become a model for military and civilian leaders for generations. Among those lessons was the realization that leadership is a responsibility and not an excuse for poor or excessive behavior.
The middle of the book touches on the key points of the Revolution and how Washington not only directed his Army, but was very influential on Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, and the other Founding Fathers when it came to the structure of the government.
After the War, Washington desperately wanted to live the rest of his life on Mount Vernon with Martha and his family. He barely settled in before it became clear that surviving the peace was going to be just as difficult as winning the War. This section is eye-opening when you realized that what we take for granted started here. Three Branches of Government, an independent Supreme Court, and literally everything else could not have existed as we know it without the influence of Washington.
Finally, the Appendix contains a copy of Washington's farewell address. It is not simply the farewell of our first President to a newly formed nation. It is also a very personal revelation of what he feels are the strengths and weaknesses of the new Republic and a warning on how it can be corrupted and destroyed. Parts of it could be written today with little or no changes.
Highly recommended for lovers of the Constitution, Washington, the Founding Fathers in general, or the American Revolution.
Another excellent book by Bret Baier. The book gives a very good historical account of Washington's role as the Commander of the American Army during the American Revolution, his leadership role in the Constitutional Convention and the creation of our Constitution, and his leadership as the first President of the United States. Every time I read another book about the American Revolution, I am more and more amazed at how we possibly won that war. It definitely seems as if there was divine intervention in making that happen.
One paragraph in the book on the subject of the Constitutional Convention and the making of our Constitution really stuck out to me. It said, "Stripped down to basics, the Framer's intent might be described this way: To create a system of government that would prevent tyrannical authority (such as they had experienced under King George's rule) yet would be well organized and responsive to the will of the people. To share power effectively between the federal government and the states, and within the federal government to institute a system of checks and balances between branches of government - again, precluding any one body from gaining authoritarian control. The Constitution would "constitute" a promise between the national government and the citizens that the people would chart the course of government, rather than government imposing a course the that the people would be forced to follow. It was a bold new idea - a form of representative government known as a republic."
There are too many today who do not understand the difference between a democracy and a republic, and too many who want the government to impose a course that the people would be forced to follow, rather than the people charting the course of government. Hopefully we will get back to the vision the founder's had of a republic form of government.
I have lost count of the amount of Washington books I have read. Like my father told me a long time ago, reading about the same person is not a waste of time because you can always pan out at least one gold nugget. This book was more of a early U.S. history survey class: good in spots but repetitive. I am always leery about a television personality writing a historical book co-authored with an unknown writer who is in tiny print under the TV personality's name on the cover. But when it comes to Washington, I must see what has to be said . . . that hasn't already been said. If you don't want to sit down and read this book, at least go to a book shop, grab and copy and read chapters 10 and 11. No matter how many books I read on this subject, it always leaves me amazed that the United States became united. The war was all in itself an incredible achievement, but then a government has to be invented at that point. The forethought and insight into the direction of a nation, but men from all walks of life, spread out over thousands of square miles, is astonishing. The gold nugget, to which I referred, was a cleaner definition of Washington and being a Federalist. It wasn't the President's grab for more power, but more of a central structure that the Articles of Confederation could not cover. Hamilton's idea of Federalism and Washington's idea were not parallel. If you are a big Founders fan, I would suggest you read it. If you would also like to know more about how the United States was born, but you don't want a deep dive this book is also a good one to read and have a better understanding.
I would recommend this book. Baier does his usual good work telling an important story with attention to detail and with an “angle” to bring out new information.
I will say for many of us, the details of Revolutionary War combat was repetitive. If you have studied much about it, or even like documentaries on FNC or the History Channel, you will not learn much new in this section of the book. That said, the ground work had to be laid within the narrative for the remainder of the story, so just be patient and enjoy the review.
What WAS new for most, was the detail about how Washington conducted himself during the framing of the Constitution, and his relationships with the other framers. Also, the background and reference material regarding his reluctance to serve; his desire to be “just” a gentleman farmer. We all see the false humility in politicians; I don’t wanna do this, but golly shucks I gotta for the good of the country. Uh-huh. It is easy to make the same assumption about Washington’s famous reluctance. But Baier convinced me… Washington was the real deal. He served because fate, and his contemporaries, convinced him he must.
-Regional differences in culture and economics make it difficult for all states to come together with solutions that make everyone happy. -Balancing personal freedoms so dear to Americans' hearts with the real need for an overarching national system to protect the citizens and interests of everyone is a never ending struggle. -Charismatic leaders on opposite sides of a debate make discussions of unity difficult and polarizing. -Can common people really make informed and good choices or should informed and educated leaders speak for them? -How far out of line does a President need to go before we can impeach him? -Party lines being drawn boldly and deeply in the sand creating an atmosphere that makes it near impossible to reach a sound resolution for anything concerning the governing of the entire country.
We do live in politically tumultuous times. If you're unsure of that, just turn on the TV and the media will tell you how at odds we all are with each other. Different races can't get along, different parties won't come together to talk about the same issues, even Thanksgiving dinner can be a dangerous place if you're not in agreement with your own family. Well, the atmosphere of distrust, uncertainty, and disagreement couldn't be worse today than it was when our Founding Fathers were hashing out The US Constitution. There were ACTUAL duels, armed citizens rebelling, the need for government meetings to take place at rotating and undisclosed location for safety concerns, and a really big Imperial government at odds with the goals of the colonists who wanted to decide their own fate.
Most of us know that the colonies (to become states later) were pretty separate from one another. Most of us know that Washington was an integral figure in bringing about America's freedom. We also know that the authors of The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, and The Bill of Rights left the problem of slavery to a later generation (and, no, they didn't ignore it; they simply could not solve it). What this title does for me is bring together the timeline of British Colony to Revolution to These United States of America. We didn't just win the war (with France's more than generous help) and POOF it's all resolved. They had no model to follow--they were doing their own thing and not everyone agreed on how to do that.
What I really enjoyed about this title was that it wasn't TOO detailed where I got lost in any one person's or location's story; it was broad enough to inform the whole process from minor discontent to rebellion to revolution to new nation building. I found the 4 sections a useful separation for the content and the language he used to be very accessible. This was a quicker read than most histories I've read in the past. There are many quotes from both the Founding Fathers and the biographers of them and other historians that Baier draws on to tell the story. The whole text isn't made up of 18th century writings, though, it's just sprinkled in where the original source says something better or clearer than anyone else could make it.
Americans should read this!
"This book tells the story of the Framers and their great leader—and how close they came to not getting a constitution at all."
"After the war, Congress had moved its headquarters to New York City, abandoning a Philadelphia beset by disruptions from disgruntled veterans seeking back pay, and from outspoken early abolitionists."
"Writing the constitution of a new nation was more like working at a forge than building a cathedral: loud, hot, and messy."
"This scheme rested on the belief that “the people” could be trusted only up to a point. If they were given free rein to elect all the representatives, who knew what kind of unseemly group would end up in Congress? In the days of revolution, the loudest voices in the room moved the population toward a national purpose, but such an unruly spirit would hardly be suitable for running a country."
"The man who wrote that “all men are created equal” operated his plantation and organized his personal life through the labor of hundreds of enslaved people."
"It was the Senate’s job to formulate how the courts would operate, from the Supreme Court to the lower courts. The Judiciary Act, passed and signed by Washington in September 1789, put in place the final leg on the stool."
"And those who think we live in an unusually violent time never experienced an era where political battles were settled at gunpoint and insults were resolved by duels."
While much of the information presented in To Rescue the Constitution: George Washington and the Fragile American Experiment is not unheard of (by me), it serves as a great reminder of where our country started, how it has survived, and its inevitable outcome of embracing ideas that shape our country.
Also, while it is evidently incredibly well-researched, it comes from an author that it is affiliated with a ‘news’ network that is off-putting to say the least. For me, difficult to accept. That being said, kudos are in order for the presentation within the book of (mostly) facts. A look into the mind, demeanour, and respect that George Washington had is inspiring. An example of fairness, calm disposition, and love for family and country is evident.
An important reminder of what was a shaky start to a powerhouse nation.
Includes an Introduction, Prologue, Afterword, Appendix (Washington’s Farewell Address), Acknowledgments, Notes, and Index.
Great History on the Founding of United States and George Washington!
I loved this book on our history and George Washington by Bret Baier! He does such a great job teaching and sharing with us how important it all was and how important George Washington was to the nation and its people. I wish more young people would get a desire to learn more about our previous Presidents and our history. It’s so important they do, especially so they can vote properly and know what kind of nation we were founded to be. It’s what makes the great nation we are. Thank you to #NetGalley and the author and publishers Harper Collins Publishers for the opportunity to read and review #ToRescueTheConstitution with my own thoughts and opinions.
Really enjoyed reading --It was not like the Chernow (sp) book on Washington that I just got bogged down in details. I'm not saying that was not a good book. I just had trouble.
This book was more relative to today and I'm sure that was done intently. I appreciated the fact bickering, back stabbing, out right lies were just as much common then as they are now. The only difference I can see from my small perch is that somehow these group of men from different cultures within the new states were able to come to a compromise and produce a document that is a livable document and has served this country well. The same fears they had then are still present now. The same call for actions to scrap it then are still being called now.
Reasonable summary of other histories, but I was mostly annoyed that it promised a deep book into his facilitation of the Constitutional Convention and instead gave a peer shallow overview of his entire life. I expected Chernow and instead got a bunch of Wikipedia-level summaries. It was nice to hear excerpts of speeches and things, but it was nothing deeper than a high school class.
I read 131 pages of this one and had to walk away from it. I found myself not really wanting to pick it back up to read. I don't know that it was bad, but it couldn't hold my interest.
An excellent history of George Washington and his invaluable role in managing the Constitutional Convention. You can’t read this account and others without coming to the conclusion that this nation might not have survived without this indispensable man.
I very much liked Baier’s “Three Days” series. While different, this is just as good if not a tick better. It’s not strictly biography and not a straight history, but a hybrid of how Washington, through word and deed, continues to exceed our expectations.
A must read, especially now when every Founder is being maligned.
Enjoyed it but not as good as some other books about the American revolution. Biggest take away was without Washington the constitution would have never succeeded, not because he contributed much but because he was so well respected and his presence alone was enough to give people confidence in the new government.
Bret Baier's To Rescue the Constitution comes at an interesting moment in American history. With our democratic norms and institutions in jeopardy and our society badly divided, Baier takes us back to the founding of the nation and reminds us that full-throated disagreement has always been the legacy of our democracy.
The book is an abbreviated review of George Washington's pivotal role in the nation's founding from his early military leadership and oversight of the constitutional convention to his election as President and his critical role in the very first peaceful transition of power. Baier touches on all these key moments succinctly and with a gentle eye on their meaning for our modern-day democracy now quickly approaching its 250th anniversary.
Baier's book reminds us that there has always been a history of political division in our country, but there is also a history of overcoming division for the greater good. For those who see our current circumstances as unique and our divisions as insurmountable, our nation's founding may provide an encouraging example of how even the starkest disagreements can be overcome so long as we hold fast to our core democratic values and the idea that compromise can lead to stronger policy and better democracy.
In commenting about how this history reflects upon our current times, Baier says, "Unity is what we crave, even in the midst of our divisions. The lessons of the past can lead us back there. When I visited Independence Hall, where our government was born, I could viscerally feel the push and pull of ideas, the bitter conflicts, and the breakthroughs, all happening under the steady eye of Washington. And I could visualize the ultimate consensus, as the Framers lined up, quills in hand, to sign the new constitution."
There is much to like about this book from its simplicity and brevity to its effort to make history relevant to our current moment. It was an easy and enjoyable read. My only criticism is that it might be too simplistic and perhaps not as critically reflective enough of Washington's failures. One does not need to disown Washington to recognize his human failings, but this biography feels a bit too idealized a history of our first President. In addition, while the focus of a biography should rightly be on Washington, there are crucial moments of history that are glossed over and made to feel less significant because of the book's lack of attention to them.
Telling the story of George Washington and his role in pushing the nascent democracy towards stability and success must also reflect on the times that he lived in and the critical, history altering moments that happened around him. Yet too many important moments are left undetailed for my liking. To some extent, Baier's lack of detailed focus on the intense disagreement among the constitutional framers (outside of Washington) and the early political leaders undermines his point that democracy is a messy affair and always has been.
Having said that, an author must always make choices about what to include when writing biography and Baier's intense focus on Washington (and only Washington) still provides ample review of his impact on our nation and the challenges that he faced knitting together a nation from a loose coalition of states.
It's an interesting read and certainly worth the time.
Hey there book lovers! It is your history reading amigo, Ninetoes, coming at you with a review of Bret Baier's To Rescue the Constitution: George Washington and the Fragile American Experience. I have coffee in my system, and my thinking cap on, so let's do this!
As American heroes go, George Washington is at the very top of my list. All you have to do is look at his accomplishments to see why he rates so high in my estimation. Bret Baier and Catherine Whitney have brought my hero to life in spectacular fashion.
The book starts with looking at George Washington's role in the French and Indian War, and then the American Revolution. True, there are hundreds of books about this very subject, but it is necessary to show the reader why Washington was so important when it came to the Constitution. George Washington's role in the American Revolution is part of the reason that the revolution was won. He did not quit. He did not let his men quit. He held them together in the face of overwhelming odds. He took a rag-tag group of inexperienced soldiers and defeated the greatest army on earth. When you look at it on paper, there is no reason the Americans should have won that war. None at all. Yet, with Washington as their leader, his sheer will and determination spread throughout all of his troops, and they won.
It is going to take all of that determination and sheer will when it comes to the Constitutional Convention. He was the president of the convention, and basically watched the floor as arguments arose. If you think that the thirteen colonies all gathered together around a campfire and sang Koombaya and roasted marshmallows in unity and brotherhood, you are mistaken. The war was won, and every colony had differing ideas of what independence truly meant, and none of them were to unify the colonies into the United States. It took the celebrity and personality of George Washington to bring delegates together to work out a set of laws for everyone.
Where this book sings is in Washington himself. It is not a book of hero worship. It explains why he was so necessary for American Independence and for bringing delegates together to hammer out the Constitution. If nothing else, his sitting there as the head of the Constitutional Convention served as a reminder of why independence was necessary, and why it is necessary to band together now at the birth of our nation. But it also follows the events up to the first election after Washington and some of the problems there.
This book is packed with memorable moments and is totally relatable to politics in America in the year 2023. It is a must-read for anyone interested in history, or interested in how America got off the ground to begin with.
“In his life, Washington was more instrumental than any other person in the creation of the American ideal of leadership. He not only helped write its blueprint; he lived it. As president, the choices he made set the standard for how that role would be defined. He had no models to look to. No one left a note in his desk when he took office as president. He was the only president who did not receive the torch from another. He was the torch.” - Bret Baier, "To Rescue the Constitution: George Washington and the Fragile American Experiment"
As the beneficiaries of almost 250 years of American nationhood, it is easy to take for granted just how fragile our national existence was during its infancy. In a world ruled by kings and other types of sovereigns, the great powers of the earth all watched and waited to see if the Americans and their experiment in self-government would fail. The immense task of shepherding a stable, successful start to the new American government and proving the viability of republicanism to the world fell to the first president of the United States, George Washington. For the same man who had so recently defied all the odds by persevering with the Continental Army for eight trying years to secure American independence against the most powerful empire in the world, the job of president was to be another daunting challenge, one in which he had no guide to follow. “I walk on untrodden ground,” wrote Washington. “There is scarcely any part of my conduct which may not hereafter be drawn into precedent.” Despite the magnitude of the moment, Washington’s incorruptibility, his complete commitment to bringing honor to the office by his personal example, and his deep personal sense of the great public trust placed in him, made him the perfect man to meet that transformative moment in history. Because of Washington’s wise, firm, and responsible leadership at the outset, America was given the sturdiest foundation, setting the nation on a path to becoming a land brimming with hope as the standard-bearer for personal liberty and opportunity in the world. It took a man of the most upright character and supreme devotion to duty to accomplish this unparalleled feat in world history. For this and so many other reasons, you simply can never overstate the importance of George Washington to the history of the United States and to the world at large.
All of this and more becomes clear in Bret Baier’s "To Rescue the Constitution: George Washington and the Fragile American Experiment." Although certainly not the final word on Washington, Baier’s volume is a solid, concise option for those looking for a good entry point to their study of George Washington and his world.
In today’s political and cultural polarization, it is easy to forget that divisiveness has often been a feature of many of America’s most crucial moments. The Civil War is the obvious example, when divisiveness led to armed conflict. Yet sometimes we also overlook other such times. In “To Rescue the Constitution”, Fox News anchor Bret Baier reminds us of the difficulties of the founding of our nation amid divisiveness on every important issue. He frames it in the reconciling leadership of George Washington, without which the American experiment might never have been realized.
Washington, Baier notes, was a man of great character and skill yet not without faults. In the face of overwhelming odds, his calm and steady resolve and vision held the day in war and in peace. He selected, motivated and gave authority and credit to subordinates who consequently rose to nearly every occasion. While he was not immune to despair, Washington kept the fledgling nation’s leadership’s eyes on the supreme goal. He might waver and even display indecisiveness from time to time as the problems appeared insurmountable, but he reliably and ultimately sustained the crucial steadfastness to hold the course. And he rose to every calling by his countrymen, often with insightful alteration, fulfilling the demand for leadership while improving on the expectations of those calling to be led. This excellent book begins with Washington’s early years, spends a great deal of time on the Revolution years, and concludes with his leadership through the constitutional formulation and presidency. No other among the founders had Washington’s encompassing skills and vision. While not without his opponents, Washington then and now was the shaper of America’s providential destiny.
And that brings us back to today’s polarization. Although Baier expresses confidence in America’s ability to resolve its divisiveness, his theme stresses the necessity of visionary and resolute leadership of uncompromised integrity and character. Washington brought that to his divisive times. Where is that leadership today?
This narrative dive into the early days of our republic's formation was so insightful and contained stories and correspondence between our nation's founding fathers that could serve as a revitalizing antidote to the factious, vitriolic nature of our country today. These threats of factions, foreign influence, popular sovereignty, etc. were all equally, if not more potent at the inception of America, but the nobility, the forbearance, the humility and the willingness to compromise of our founders (headlined by the flagship of our beautiful country, George Washington) allowed for the cultivation and the tireless revision of a Constitution that has continued to stand for nearly 250 years.
Now, the idea presented by Baier in the Afterword of the book where he lays forth the consideration set forth first by the founders that our Constitution was not meant to be a "perpetual constitution, or even a perpetual law" (302) is an interesting one, as one is then forced to ask: "If we will allow for alteration or change to our Constitution, to what extent should those alterations be taken?"
It's a wildly difficult, but a wildly important question to be asking, and as we continue to strive for the same ideal of liberty with national unity, albeit in a context incredibly different than the one the founding fathers found themselves in. I feel as if the words of the penner of our Declaration of Independence perfectly summarizes the prevailing sentiment felt by the founding fathers.
"Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. ... We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors" (297).
This is one of Fox newscaster Bret Baier's books on American history. With all 6 of them sitting here unread, reading them in chronological order seemed to make the most sense, even though that's not necessarily the order in which they were published. Who came first, Washington or Reagan? If you don't know the answer to that, you really don't know American history!
This is not just the story of George Washington, but its the struggles he and the Founding Fathers went through to insure we have the country we have today, although that's in danger with the influx of millions of jihadist Muslims taking over. What would Washington do? Is this what those Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution?
So many people think that writing the Constitution and Declaration of Independence were items that were knocked out in just a couple of weeks. It took a lot longer. And while all that was going on, we were fighting the British in the Revolutionary War.
In a very readable style, Baier takes you through Washington's early years, the War, the Constitutional Convention and his two terms as our first president. Considering all they went through, it would have brought down a lesser person, but Washington had an inner strength that kept him going and it's thanks in large part to him that the country survived.
No matter what you political convictions might be, if you're interested in learning how this country came to be, you'll find this to be eye-opening. And, no matter how much you think you know about the history of that time, you'll more than likely find yourself saying "I didn't know that" about something in the book. Only the serious scholar will say "nothing new here - I know it all" and there's a good chance they'd be wrong! There are some hidden gems in here which means its a highly researched book and not something just thrown together.
The authors whisk you to a rainy 1787 spring that morphs into a sweltering summer in Philadelphia's Independence Hall. Delegates gather (some grudgingly) to amend the Articles of Confederation, which barely held the young nation together after its hard-won independence. But the system's so flimsy that states turn into socioeconomic fiefdoms, scrambling to pay war debts and teetering on collapse. Soon, the delegates see the Articles can't cut it in a post-revolutionary world.
Amid fiery debates, George Washington sits in the ornate president's chair, steadily guiding with his commanding presence. He says little over those turbulent months, but his calm leadership grounds the convention, proving pivotal.
Beyond the convention, the book dives into Washington's roots-his early military service, family bonds, and raw grief over a sibling's loss.
The authors effortlessly guide you through the competing state plans-like the Virginia and New Jersey plans-without bogging you down. You catch their differences and which pieces shape the Constitution.
This memorably tracks the Constitution's rocky birth. Even knowing the ending, you're fully engaged by the suspense as some states ratify while others balk. The authors expose a fractured America, where some even muse about crawling back to British rule. Without Washington's steady hand, the nation's survival is doubtful.
You experience Washington’s joy upon his liberation from public service at the end of his second presidential term. You're an emotional witness to Washington's death in December 1799. His farewell address, tucked in as an appendix, seals the book with impact.