What do you think?
Rate this book
Knowledge Factory Dismantling the Corporate University & Creating True Higher Learning (00) by Aronowitz, Stanley [Paperback (2001)]
Knowledge Factory Dismantling the Corporate University & Creating True Higher Learning (00) by Aronowitz, Stanley [Paperback (2001)]
Paperback
First published January 1, 2000
5 people are currently reading
167 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
March 6, 2015
I picked up The Knowledge Factory after having a fire ignited in me through Ivan Illich's Deschooling Society. Aronowitz's book, while informative, left me unconvinced and uninspired by his vision of what learning/education at the collegiate level should look like.
What is most disappointing about this is Aronowitz spends such a vast amount of time in the book adroitly describing the historical and sociological factors that have influenced the creation of the current knowledge "factory" which is closely linked to corporate imperatives, which stratifies academic workers into those who produce "research" (closely tied to funding from private for-profit entities) and the "teachers" overwhelmed by industrial-style teaching loads. He does a great job of showing how the creation of narrow curricula since World War II has been tailored with the needs of providing "work ready" students, and how layers of administration and bureaucracy have seized control of the university and put it in the hands of capitalists (the only ones who can give the university money in an age of defunding of school). I found though that his history bounced too much back and forth among the decades, and gets lost in the weeds at times.
Yet, the conclusion was the most disappointing element of the book for me. "What is to be done" is a remarkably unsatisfying chapter than doesn't address ANY of the structural impediments he notes in earlier chapters. He insists on a rigorous (okay, nothing wrong with that) education that combines economic, philosophical, historical and scientific histories through the reading of, for the most part, the Western Canon. The last chapter thus becomes a long bibliographic entry of his favorite books of Western Civilization. He "centers" and privileges the reading of Western authors, philosophers, and scientists--so much so that other cultures are frequently injected only THROUGH a white author ,even as he proclaims one must critique them by also reading the works of some "subaltern" groups. He suggests a 6-course sequence of studies but nothing about how this would happen within the socio-historical reality in which we find ourselves.
If I am going to have to dream about abolishing the knowledge factory, I think I've sided with anarchists like Illich.
What is most disappointing about this is Aronowitz spends such a vast amount of time in the book adroitly describing the historical and sociological factors that have influenced the creation of the current knowledge "factory" which is closely linked to corporate imperatives, which stratifies academic workers into those who produce "research" (closely tied to funding from private for-profit entities) and the "teachers" overwhelmed by industrial-style teaching loads. He does a great job of showing how the creation of narrow curricula since World War II has been tailored with the needs of providing "work ready" students, and how layers of administration and bureaucracy have seized control of the university and put it in the hands of capitalists (the only ones who can give the university money in an age of defunding of school). I found though that his history bounced too much back and forth among the decades, and gets lost in the weeds at times.
Yet, the conclusion was the most disappointing element of the book for me. "What is to be done" is a remarkably unsatisfying chapter than doesn't address ANY of the structural impediments he notes in earlier chapters. He insists on a rigorous (okay, nothing wrong with that) education that combines economic, philosophical, historical and scientific histories through the reading of, for the most part, the Western Canon. The last chapter thus becomes a long bibliographic entry of his favorite books of Western Civilization. He "centers" and privileges the reading of Western authors, philosophers, and scientists--so much so that other cultures are frequently injected only THROUGH a white author ,even as he proclaims one must critique them by also reading the works of some "subaltern" groups. He suggests a 6-course sequence of studies but nothing about how this would happen within the socio-historical reality in which we find ourselves.
If I am going to have to dream about abolishing the knowledge factory, I think I've sided with anarchists like Illich.
June 23, 2025
Probably his most sage book I’ve read so far, as far as predicting where an industry would go. The industry he tackles in this book is university teaching. Many of the horrible working conditions of adjuncts in the US University system today, which has become so corporatized, could have come off the labor news from yesterday.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews