When I read Pamela Kaufman's The Shield of Three Lions as a teenager, I absolutely adored the book and stayed up all night reading until I had finished. It was an exciting, fast paced, massively entertaining historical romp and also presented and featured everything I at that time desired in historical fiction, Medieval England, the Crusades, a spunky heroine who disguises herself as a boy, and the added bonus of a brave Scotsman on whom I developed a massive literary crush (so much so that I was actually a bit jealous of the main protagonist, of Alix of Wantwaite, and that Enoch was attracted to her, even whilst she was still disguised as a boy). And yes, in 1984 (the year I read The Shield of Three Lions), the implausibilities of the plot, of the entire storyline (and that King Richard I was only ever rumoured to have been homosexual, that there is in fact scant if any proof of this), all this did not really much bother me (although I did research the novel's, Pamela Kaufman's claims, and was even in 1984 rather surprised at how lacking ANY legitimate, factual historical details and proofs are with regard to Richard I supposedly being homosexual).
That all being said, when I recently tried to reread The Shield of Three Lions, I was indeed and frustratingly mostly just massively annoyed and bored (and so much that I ended up skimming much of the plot, much of the story). For not only had the above mentioned historic implausibilities now been chafing to such an extent that I was no longer even remotely enjoying my read, even more of an issue has been the almost constant use of gratuitous off colour language and the fact that the author seems to almost revel and wallow in this (with the most outrageous descriptions possible, dirty, violent, vicious). Now I do know and realise that the Middle Ages were NOT some gentle and genteel time, and when I first read The Shield of Three Lions as a teenager, I was actually appreciative of the earthiness of Pamela Kaufman's writing style, her vocabulary choices, her word and world building. As an older adult however, and as an older adult who has read much since 1984, I strongly feel that Pamela Kaufman simply goes too far, exaggerates too much and really seemingly just seems to use her off colour descriptions constantly and en masse to basically shock and awe, often, actually generally, at the cost of penning a believable and realistic story. As while a Medieval based novel about a young girl's experiences as a participant in a Crusade without violence, without dirt, sexual issues etc. would of course also be unbelievable, so would and so is The Shield of Three Lions in so far that the constant centering, the constant pointing out of the violence, the dirt, the sexual issues, combined with the rather vile, harsh, disgusting language choices used throughout, all this makes Pamela Kaufman's novel just as unbelievable, just as annoying as would a story that appears too sedate and too squeaky clean. Two stars (and that two star rating is mostly because I did so much love this novel as a teenager, for if I were reading The Shield of Three Lions for the first time now, I would more than likely have ranked it with but one star). And I seriously doubt I will even consider reading any of the sequels, as I am so totally not interested anymore and am of course also assuming that Pamela Kaufman's writing style and choice of words will also likely not have improved.