What Gertrude Stein did for experimental grammar, E. E. Cummings expanded to the level of spelling. Poetry, or at least modern poetry, primarily serves as an originality machine, initially on the part of the author, but hopefully resulting in some change in the reader as well.
Both of these authors knew all too well how easy it is to slide back into cliches (such as "all too well"); the more comfortable we become with cliches, the more difficult thinking becomes. Of course, in the cliched mind, thinking feels quite easy, too easy, to the point that you can't really call it thinking. At first blush, much of E. E. Cummings' poetry looks random, like people love to accuse modern art of being. But on closer inspection, many of the poems follow traditional poetic forms, especially sonnets. Meaning is deflected at first glance, but coagulates the more patiently you approach the text.
Though a book of poetry this experimental threatens at every moment to become either repetitive or incoherent, Cummings mercifully leaves some readerly footholds in each poem, no matter how visually explosive. If he stretches them out and dismembers the words, the grammar is fairly standard. If he interrupts the grammar, the sonic quality gives a cadence that carries it evenly along. The few times that the stars align and he has more straightforward grammar and formatting, they tend to fall a bit flat. But he shines in his visual playfulness, isolating the two "o"s in "look" on their own line so that you get the effect of two eyes peeking between the lines.
Ultimately, Cummings is brimming with life and positivity in a way refreshingly reminiscent of Walt Whitman. He has that indefatigable American spirit, the best of Twain and Vonnegut and other secular humanist satirists. One "controversial" poem in the collection uses the word "kike", only to beautifully disarm the word:
a kike is the most dangerous
machine as yet invented
by even yankee ingenu
ity(out of a jew a few
dead dollars and some twisted laws)
it comes both prigged and canted
The few times he addresses politics, it comes off with the same all-American values as old Superman comics, not jingoistic Republicanism or virtue-signalling Democratism. He interestingly calls "down with the fascist beast" after the end of WWII, knowing that vigilance is the price of liberty. But more often than not, he defers a direct meaning, letting it linger and perhaps percolate at a later date, should you be patient enough to dwell within the poems themselves. For ultimately, he writes "of a joy which wasn't and isn't and won't be words"; this is bold for a poet to admit, but I think it's only gaining more relevance today, as are his calls to embodied over cerebral knowledge: "i feel that(false and true are merely to know) / Love only has ever been,is,and will be,So"
One of my favorite parts of the collection is how regularly the momentum of poems, rather than driving you on to the next poem, instead boomerang you back to the start of the poem. Most every poem starts out in the middle of a sentence, in the middle of a phrase, with the weight of the absence of what came before being palpable, being needful and in a strange way, almost more real than the poem itself. He also regularly slices that first line with a parenthesis, using them as regularly and readily as Derrida, but to much more creative ends. A great example is found on page 6:
dying is fine)but Death
?o
baby
i
wouldn't like
Death if Death
were
good:for
when(instead of stopping to think)you
begin to feel of it,dying
's miraculous
why?be
cause dying is
perfectly natural;perfectly
putting
it mildly lively(but
Death
is strictly
scientific
& artificial &
evil & legal)
we thank thee
god
almighty for dying
(forgive us,o life! the sin of Death
With the lack of spacing around punctuation, Cummings evokes the breathless urgency of Mark the Evangelist and his many "immediately"s, as if his undistilled human energy is so powerful that it can barely be contained in language, in marks upon a page, in a book awkwardly tall and thin. For really, the reason why I plucked this one off the shelf was how it stuck out, gangly among the sea of thick, squat commentaries. For even, once you open it, the text itself is the thinnest of typewriter fonts, not the standard, thicker fare common to reputable publishers. But I think the typewriter font is fitting; it makes it feel like this was his first draft, straight from the typewriter and into the book. And that's what we're tempted to think, what with our impatient, information-hungry media consumption landscape. We glance and skim headlines to our own detriment, having less than no time for poetry. But, ironically, these fast, frantic, lively poems demand a slow, close attention, and a fair serving of repetition. They flower outward in both these respects, seeing the many decisions that went into every poem. This is the sign of a true master: the ability to create works which look both raw and refined, both first and final draft.