I suspect that most readers of this book will come to it through the author's fiction writing. His fans will be interested in McMurtry’s "other life" as a book scout and bookstore owner. Perhaps such fans will be interested into this window on the author's thoughts and experiences. I came to the book through a different route, as a consumer of biographies and memoirs of book people and tales of the book trade (yes, there is such a literature). From this perspective, I found the book to be very puzzling. Indeed, if readers didn't know who McMurtry was, I think that they would be surprised to discover that he is an award-winning novelist, given the book's lack of organization and thematic continuity.
The book starts interestingly enough, with McMurtry telling of his early bookless childhood, his discovery of books and reading, and then his earliest book-buying days. The biographical thread is soon lost, however, and the book settles into a series of very short chapters, most describing an individual event or thought. Although the events are roughly chronological, they do not add up to the story of his life or bookselling. They seem disconnected and often rather diffidently written, as if the author didn't want to claim much interest for them.
Many of the chapters surround a single incident, and this anecdotal aspect of book-buying and -selling is a common enough way to write such a book. However, McMurtry often purposefully sucks the blood out of these anecdotes, leaving out background, omitting details that might be embarrassing to a participant, or simply stating things without describing them (the "so-and-so was quite a character" comment, making the reader wonder just what kind of character so-and-so was).
For example, the author tells the tale of a book scout who found a copy of Poe's "Tamerlane." This sounds like a great story, one that could take up a couple of pages of the book by giving complete background and juicy details (even if some are made up). There is a way to tell this anecdote, familiar to readers of book-trade stories. First, readers need to know that "Tamerlane" was for a long time the Holy Grail of American book collecting, as the rarest of Poe's books by far. The frustration of collectors willing to pay millions for this unavailable book should be detailed. Then the book scout himself should be profiled, with all his adorable quirks. Then comes the story surrounding the discovery, which almost always involves the book scout giving up... but then noticing an old box of books behind the counter (or perhaps a book covered in dust under the dog's bed--the more remote the better). Once having identified the book, the scout must remain very calm and bargain the seller down as much as possible, so that he or she has no idea that this book is worth more than all the rest of the stock put together. Hopefully the scout gets it for 75 cents or something and then sells it to Bill Gates for $500,000.
What we get from "Books" is a single paragraph, with no explanation of Tamerlane's importance, no information whatever about the scout, no story about its discovery or about its subsequent sale. Indeed, as written, this is a mere random fact about someone buying a single book for an unknown price and then doing we don't know what with it--it's a completely uninteresting fact, rather than an anecdote. If there was no story here (which seems unlikely), why bother to tell us about it at all? Although the entire book is not quite so bloodless, too much of it is very short accounts of sales or buying, with very little flesh on the stories. Even a fan of this genre like me was tapping my foot waiting for the book to be over.
In another anecdote, a collector asked for McMurtry's store to give him an offer on his library. He never got back to the store, and they gave up. "Several years" later, he called up and told them to come and take the books away. Interesting! But why did the owner decide not to sell them the first time and why did he then change his mind? Absolutely nothing is said about either: "He had owned those books as long as he wanted to" is the only comment. This is hardly informative. Does McMurtry have no thoughts on what makes people hold onto their books? Or want to get rid of all of them? If not, why is he writing a book about this?
Towards the end, the author starts to give his thoughts on reading, the future of books, the role of bookstores, and so on. I was honestly interested in finding out the author's opinion on these things. However, the mini-essays were often simply his conclusions, with little explanation or justification. In one essay, he talks about how he fell into a depression and could only read diaries. Why diaries?? No explanation! Then he states that he still rereads the diaries, with the following aphorism: "The motives for rereading are different from those of first readings, but the rereads are no less valuable for that." Mmmmm.... right. But what ARE the motives for each? Surely someone who has read and reread (and written) as much as McMurtry must have some ideas about this. Instead, we're given this very flat conclusion.
At the end, I thought that the author clearly could have written an interesting and insightful book about this topic, but my sense is that he simply did not take the time and effort to do so. Many chapters are written independently, and I imagine him thinking, "Oh, what about the time we tried to buy that collection of erotica?" and then jotting down a brief account of it and then making it the next chapter. The next day he had a quick thought about audiobooks and so wrote that down, and it became the next chapter.
I'm sorry to be so negative about the book, which I honestly expected to enjoy. I read it a month after reading a conceptually similar book, "A Pound of Paper" by John Baxter. It also begins with the author's childhood and early discovery of books and writing, also following him through his life as a book scout and then writer and English professor. But Baxter is the master of the anecdote, and he also gives the reader rich detail about the characters and venues of British book sales, including the times he was robbed or pulled a fast one on someone else. Baxter's anecdotes work because he writes them like a novelist, who doesn't seem to care about whether he hurts the "characters'" feelings. I'm sure he made up details when he didn't remember. But what do I care?
Other books to consider are those by the booksellers Leona Rostenberg and Madeleine Stern, who describe their trips to Europe after the war, giving detailed bibliographical information on the books and incisive portraits of the eccentric antique booksellers. Finally, a recent entry is a book by David Batterham, "Among Booksellers," consisting of letters to a friend he wrote while on book-buying tours of the Continent. This goes well into the personal realm in describing the everyday victories and disasters of both travel and book-buying. Although I had never heard of the author (who does not seem to be an important figure), I found the book oddly compelling, as Batterham pours out his feelings as well as bookish information. It is that personal touch that seems to be missing from so much of McMurtry's memoir, as if he were under a court order not to violate his or anyone else's privacy. Perhaps in addition to reading diaries, he is keeping a diary. If it is ever publishing, I am sure it will contain more of his feelings and thoughts than he put into "Books."