Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Closing time

Rate this book
First Edition

Paperback

First published January 1, 1973

2 people are currently reading
63 people want to read

About the author

Norman O. Brown

20 books66 followers
Norman Oliver Brown was an American classicist who is known for his translation and commentaries on the works of Hesiod. A student of Carl Schorske and Isaiah Berlin, he taught classics at Wesleyan University, University of Rochester, and UC-Santa Cruz.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
12 (44%)
4 stars
14 (51%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
1 (3%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Carolyn.
188 reviews6 followers
July 21, 2014
"Two books get on top of each other and become sexual."
Like being inside the quick witted mind of Norman Brown as he reads Finnegans Wake and the New Science, after having written Love's Body.
A wonderful, delightful weaving of great minds: Brown in conversation with James Joyce and Giambattista Vico. Makes you want to stand up and shout.
862 reviews20 followers
June 29, 2017
An ongoing dialogue between Norman O. Brown, Giambattista Vico and James Joyce. Vico (1668 –1744), an Italian philosopher who wrote The New Science, was the first writer to claim that human affairs were strictly human—God had nothing to do with them. Joyce was influenced by Vico.

Brown relies on passages from The New Science, Finnegans Wake, and his own work to create a creative interplay.

Vico is best known for his "verum factum" principle, which states that truth is verified through creation or invention and not, as per Descartes, through observation: “The criterion and rule of the true is to have made it. Accordingly, our clear and distinct idea of the mind cannot be a criterion of the mind itself, still less of other truths. For while the mind perceives itself, it does not make itself.” (Reference Wikipedia.)

I am not a philosopher, but I never thought Descartes’ “I think, therefore I am” was convincing, even though it may have logically followed from preceding propositions. Vico’s reasoning seems much closer to the truth.
Profile Image for s..
3 reviews1 follower
Read
May 3, 2007
The structuring of this narrative is reason enough for reading this book. Brown's method of incorporating literature (both in form and reference) and philosophy is intriguing and enlightening.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.