Leopold Classic Library is delighted to publish this classic book as part of our extensive collection. As part of our on-going commitment to delivering value to the reader, we have also provided you with a link to a website, where you may download a digital version of this work for free. Many of the books in our collection have been out of print for decades, and therefore have not been accessible to the general public. Whilst the books in this collection have not been hand curated, an aim of our publishing program is to facilitate rapid access to this vast reservoir of literature. As a result of this book being first published many decades ago, it may have occasional imperfections. These imperfections may include poor picture quality, blurred or missing text. While some of these imperfections may have appeared in the original work, others may have resulted from the scanning process that has been applied. However, our view is that this is a significant literary work, which deserves to be brought back into print after many decades. While some publishers have applied optical character recognition (OCR), this approach has its own drawbacks, which include formatting errors, misspelt words, or the presence of inappropriate characters. Our philosophy has been guided by a desire to provide the reader with an experience that is as close as possible to ownership of the original work. We hope that you will enjoy this wonderful classic book, and that the occasional imperfection that it might contain will not detract from the experience.
Royce, born in Grass Valley, California on November 20, 1855. He was the son of Josiah and Sarah Eleanor (Bayliss) Royce, whose families were recent English emigrants, and who sought their fortune in the westward movement of the American pioneers in 1849. He received the B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley (which moved from Oakland to Berkeley during his matriculation) in 1875 where he later accepted an instructorship teaching English composition, literature, and rhetoric. After some time in Germany, where he studied with Hermann Lotze, the new Johns Hopkins University awarded him in 1878 one of its first four doctorates, in philosophy. At Johns Hopkins he taught a course on the history of German thought, which was “one of his chief interests” because he was able to give consideration to the philosophy of history.[1] After four years at the University of California, Berkeley, he went to Harvard in 1882 as a sabbatical replacement for William James, who was at once Royce's friend and philosophical antagonist. Royce's position at Harvard was made permanent in 1884 and he remained there until his death, September 14, 1916.
Historiography
Royce stands out starkly in the philosophical crowd because he was the only major American philosopher who spent a significant period of his life studying and writing history, specifically of the American West. “As one of the four giants in American philosophy of his time […] Royce overshadowed himself as historian, in both reputation and output” (Pomeroy, 2). During his first three years at Harvard, Royce taught many different subjects such as English composition, forensics, psychology and philosophy for other professors. Although he eventually settled into writing philosophy, his early adulthood was characterized by wide-ranging interests, during which he wrote a novel, investigated paranormal phenomena (as a skeptic), and published a significant body of literary criticism. Only as historian and philosopher did he distinguish himself. Royce spread himself too thin, however, and in 1888 suffered a nervous breakdown which required him to take a leave of absence from his duties.
The Ingersoll Lectures on Human Immortality were established by a bequest in 1893 and are given annually at Harvard University. Many distinguished scholars have given the Ingersoll Lecture over the years, including the American philosopher Josiah Royce (1855 -- 1916) who gave his lecture early in the life of the series, in 1899. Royce was a professor of philosophy at Harvard for over 30 years and was a friend and colleague of William James who in 1897 also was the Ingersoll Lecturer. Royce's lecture was expanded and published in 1900 under the title "The Conception of Immortality".
Royce's lecture is a short, eloquent guide to his thinking at a key moment in his philosophical career. At the time of the lectures, Royce was in the middle of his Gifford Lectures, titled "The World and the Individual", a lengthy two-volume work which offers the fullest exposition of Royce's philosophy of absolute idealism. His Ingersoll Lecture draws heavily on this work and presents much of his thinking in a non-technical way. Royce's absolute idealism has few adherents in contemporary philosophy and it is worth noting at the outset some of Royce's teachings that give contemporary philosophers pause. As an absolute idealist, Royce held that reality was spiritual and that reality consisted of one unified thing (for want of a better term) the Absolute of which all individuals were a part. Royce also saw the Absolute and reality as rational in character. Finally, Royce did not take the "linguistic turn" that soon would come to dominate American and British philosophy. Royce saw language as partial at best and in his Ingersoll Lectures stressed that truth and reality were in significant part beyond language.
Royce takes only a few pages at the end of his lecture in discussing the theme of human immortality. During most of the lecture, Royce tries to develop the concept of individuality -- what it means to be an individual person -- and to relate this development to his concept of the Absolute. His understanding of immortality, Royce claims, follows from a proper understanding of the nature of individuality. In explaining the goal of his lecture, Royce says:
"What I want to show you is that the chief mystery of any man is precisely the mystery of his individual nature, i.e. of the mystery whereby he is this man and no other man. I want to show you that the only solution of this mystery lies in conceiving every man as so related to the world and to the very life of God that in order to be an individual at all a man has to be nearer to the Eternal than in our present life we are accustomed to observe." (16-17)
So in his lecture, Royce develops the concept of individuality as involving teleology -- a sense of purpose -- and as moving beyond the finite and partial world of sense to be directed towards the Absolute. Royce's philosophy has both a strong sense of individuality and a strong sense of absolutism. He believes that the finite individual that we see and describe is only part of the nature of each unique individual. Each person is connected to each other person in the Absolute. It is in that sense, as unique and as part of an Absolute that Royce finds the individual human person immortal. Royce finds it is impossible to be more specific about what this might mean.
Royce's lecture is complex and brief but it gives insight into his thinking. In places the lecture is hortatory and in places it is moving and eloquent. In particular, Royce develops his understanding of the individuality, uniqueness, and mystery of each person from a discussion of human love and of the mystery with which a lover tries to see and understand the beloved. He finds that the nature of human uniqueness is most clearly shown through "intimate human relationships". (51) When we are with a person we love and feel we know, we realize that person's individuality is beyond all our individual experiences of him or her and remains largely private and a mystery. Royce writes of the uniqueness of the beloved and of each person:
"The unique eludes us; yet we remain faithful to the ideal of it; and in spite of sense and of our merely abstract thinking, it becomes for us the most real thing in the actual world, although for us it is the elusive goal of an infinite quest." (71)
Royce proceeds to develop this ideal of uniqueness, best seen in human love, through the practice of science and knowledge to an Absolute beyond all finite activities and to a sense of individual immortality in the Absolute.
As with much of Royce, the power of this lecture lies more in its suggestions and frequent eloquence than in its argument. Royce's Ingersoll Lecture is worth reading for those interested in his thought and in philosophical and religious issues even for those who are far from Royce's own thought. It is also worth thinking about Royce's lecture as part of the still ongoing progression of the Ingersoll Lectures and about different ways of understanding the subject matter of this venerable series. Royce's "The Conception of Immortality" has been digitalized as part of an ongoing effort to provide an online edition of Royce's complete works. Thus it is easily accessible to an interested reader.
A good, short introduction to the way Royce thinks and writes. I may take a little time to get used to his style being that he wrote over 100 years ago. But Royce is a thinker we should not forget as we struggle to get our religious footing in this very contentious time.