This controversial new series raises fundamental questions about the authenticity of Shakespeare's texts as we know them today. In a radical departure from existing series, it presents the earliest known editions of Shakespeare's plays -- which often differ substantially from the present versions -- and argues that these are the most authentic we have.
Okay so I picked this up thinking it might be a helpful tool to use in the classroom while teaching Julius Caesar. This graphic novel is 1) more boring than Shakespeare’s text, 2) more confusing than Shakespeare’s text, and 3) oddly homogeneous. Many of the characters look very alike. It’s hard to tell who’s talking from panel to panel/page to page because they just look so alike. I’ve read Julius Caesar and annotated it, and struggled to remember who was speaking. This would be so tough for students. The arts somewhat colorless and lacks intensity, which is strange for such a bloody and dramatic play. There aren’t really dark shadows or a lot of contrast in the art, which I just thought was kinda odd. Anyway, I really don’t want to use this to teach. I feel it would do more harm than good.