Thank you to Netgalley and Mulholland books for providing me with a complimentary copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.
2.5 stars
So I began reading this book, book 2 of the Rachel Knight series, immediately upon completion of the first. In some ways, this was a step down, but I did enjoy how Clark wove this mystery into the story. Unlike the other two I’ve read, this one does not have a simple resolution.
At the outset I should note that although these are part of a series, every single one can be read as a standalone. Clark doles out details from previous books that she thinks are helpful as needed, but she doesn’t spend too much time providing backstory. Since each case is its own case, much like a Law & Order episode, you don’t have to have read one to understand the next.
The problems I had with the first book, concerning filler obsessions with clothing (no, character, it was no so cold you had to break out your thermal underwear; stop trying to convince me otherwise, ugh), food, and alcohol, are more pronounced in this book, but that could be because I began reading it so immediately after the first. What also became more noticeable to me is that her two best friends don’t have much characterization. This is especially true with Bailey, with whom Rachel spends most of her time during the investigations. Bailey, I guess, is supposed to be stoic, but it just comes off as flat and wooden. The side characters and perps have more personality than she does.
Another thing that really bothered me is that although this takes place about a year after the first book, there’s practically no progression in Rachel’s relationship with Graden. Let me put it to you this way - she is in her thirties. He is at least her age, if not older, yet they have done nothing but go on dates - for a year. They have not spent time in the other’s home, and they have not slept together either in the literal or figurative sense. That seems completely and utterly unrealistic to me. We aren’t talking about two young adults here - we are talking about adults living in a fairly progressive city who have been involved with others in the past, and you’re telling me they haven’t gone past first base? I’m not asking, or expecting, sex scenes in the book, and I get that she has commitment issues so she doesn’t want to “pick out china patterns,” but the notion that they’ve never been alone together in their own homes and been intimate is, to me, ridiculous at this stage in the game. It made her feel immature, and less modern than she’s written.
Then there’s the whole subplot involving Rachel’s sister and Rachel’s nuclear overreaction when someone brings up the subject after having learned of it by finding a news article during a Google search. That’s not an invasion of your privacy, Rachel. That person did nothing wrong. I get that you don’t want to talk about it, but don’t pretend like someone stuck a tail on you to find out all your secret and private habits. That story hasn’t been private since it made headline news. That entire subplot again made her seem immature and annoying, which sucks because I ordinarily really like her, even when she’s obsessing about it being cold and stealing other people’s food off their plates. -.-
The investigation itself was, as always, pretty riveting, but sometimes got bogged down by amazing coincidences (not to mention the time taken to stop and eat, drink, and be merry). And once again, Clark doesn’t always voice her train of thought on a particular deductive thread, yet expects you to follow. She makes leaps and assumptions that are not obvious given what the characters know and she doesn’t always connect the dots in a way that flows, because she still has to link the conclusions back to other pieces of evidence, or at least explain away some of the questions that are raised when the characters make their conclusions.
Rachel makes several poor decisions - both in her personal and professional life - that really detract from her character this time around, and it really highlights how much Rachel is allowed to get away with straying from a “by the book” investigation. One of those decisions, in an attempt to capture the perp, can only be deemed too stupid to live. It works, of course, because why not? But it was still such a facepalm moment for me that I couldn’t believe the same author who wrote The Competition wrote this one.
Of the three I have read so far (Books 1, 2, and 4), this is probably my least favorite. So much filler, a lot of deductive leaps that didn’t make sense and raised more questions than they answered, and some poor decisions by Rachel really made this one a step backward.