I rated this textbook 2 stars, and honestly, that’s being generous. The only reason it even made it to two stars is because of the sheer brilliance and warmth of my professor—Isabelle Donald, a true icon of CLAS 102—whose teaching managed to rescue some of the most confusing parts of this book and make them engaging. Without her? I probably would’ve set the book down and never looked back.
Where do I start? The textbook is painfully dry. It tries to do this weird double-duty of being a foundational overview and offering primary text excerpts… but neither part fully commits. It’s like trying to have a foot in two different worlds and ending up flat on your face. The myth summaries are surface-level and watered down, then immediately followed by small chunks of actual source material that feel jarring and poorly integrated. The pacing feels half-baked, the analysis is oddly generalized, and the tone swings from overly simplified to overly academic without much warning.
Honestly, I’ve told multiple classmates: skip the textbook. Go read the full myth, the actual drama, the original primary text—whether it’s The Bacchae or any of the other classics. You’ll get a much deeper, richer understanding than what this textbook attempts to provide in piecemeal form.
And no, I don’t think I’m just being picky because I’m taking CLAS 305 (Comparative Myth). I’ve read my fair share of academic texts, and I know what an effective, thoughtful textbook can look like. This one? It wasn’t it. If you need to reconnect with a myth, revisit your own essays or just re-read the original material. That’s what I did.
Ultimately, this textbook feels like a disservice to the stories it tries to teach—saved only by a good prof who can breathe life back into it.