What do you think?
Rate this book
Taboo: Mommy Knows Best
Sex, sex, and more HARDCORE sex!
Mrs. Baker loves her adopted sons more than anything, but only one of them loves her back.
Michael has always been the resistant one, never giving in to his mother's advances. When their relationship finally comes to a head, though, Michael sees what he's been missing as he and his step brother, Thomas, experience their step mother's sweet pussy together for the very first time.
It's totally uncensored, totally hot, and totally TABOO, as only Kelly Haven and Sweet Nothing's can do!
Erotic fiction so hot it'll melt your Kindle!
Also featured excerpts from Daddy's Little Slut, His Naughty Little Girl, His Daughter's Best Friend and Her Best Friend's Dad.
Mrs. Baker loves her adopted sons more than anything, but only one of them loves her back.
Michael has always been the resistant one, never giving in to his mother's advances. When their relationship finally comes to a head, though, Michael sees what he's been missing as he and his step brother, Thomas, experience their step mother's sweet pussy together for the very first time.
It's totally uncensored, totally hot, and totally TABOO, as only Kelly Haven and Sweet Nothing's can do!
Erotic fiction so hot it'll melt your Kindle!
Also featured excerpts from Daddy's Little Slut, His Naughty Little Girl, His Daughter's Best Friend and Her Best Friend's Dad.
30 pages, Kindle Edition
First published September 11, 2011
5 people are currently reading
17 people want to read
About the author
Kelly Haven
103 books30 followersKelly Haven is the founder and CEO of Sweet Nothings. Erotic fiction so hot it'll melt your Kindle. She's a confessed nymphomaniac, chocoholic, and loves a cold beer after a sweaty day of fun.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
January 25, 2012
Kelly Haven, Mommy Knows Best (Sweet Nothings, 2011)
Another “we'll get around the OMGINCEST thing by putting 'step-' in front of every familial reference” piece, and I have to admit, I do take that into account when reading; if you're going to write it, at least have the cojones to stand up for it, rather than changing it to fit into Amazon's arbitrary and eminently stupis rule so you can make a little more cash. Not that the author of this particular travesty should. It's generic porn where the familial aspect is supposed to add spice (or “transgressiveness” if you're a hipster, I guess), but without the author having done anything to justify that spice other than slap labels on the characters. You know when the teacher said “show, don't tell?” Here's a prime example. This story has three one-dimensional, interchangeable characters (“interchangeable” save one has breasts and two do not), and, in the way of far too much porn, we know just enough about them to give our imaginations bare details to run with. That's annoying when the author is writing a scene that is, in fact, generic, and just giving us cup sizes and jockstrap meaurements. But here—where the entire story turns on us needing more than “stepmother” and “stepsons” as labels in order for us to buy the line that haven is attempting to feed us—it causes the collapse, pretty much, of any possibility of this even managing to be decent one-handed reading material. Try again. Once more—with feeling. * ½
Another “we'll get around the OMGINCEST thing by putting 'step-' in front of every familial reference” piece, and I have to admit, I do take that into account when reading; if you're going to write it, at least have the cojones to stand up for it, rather than changing it to fit into Amazon's arbitrary and eminently stupis rule so you can make a little more cash. Not that the author of this particular travesty should. It's generic porn where the familial aspect is supposed to add spice (or “transgressiveness” if you're a hipster, I guess), but without the author having done anything to justify that spice other than slap labels on the characters. You know when the teacher said “show, don't tell?” Here's a prime example. This story has three one-dimensional, interchangeable characters (“interchangeable” save one has breasts and two do not), and, in the way of far too much porn, we know just enough about them to give our imaginations bare details to run with. That's annoying when the author is writing a scene that is, in fact, generic, and just giving us cup sizes and jockstrap meaurements. But here—where the entire story turns on us needing more than “stepmother” and “stepsons” as labels in order for us to buy the line that haven is attempting to feed us—it causes the collapse, pretty much, of any possibility of this even managing to be decent one-handed reading material. Try again. Once more—with feeling. * ½
Displaying 1 of 1 review