Picked this up outside of Books Through Bars for free. I had the sense she is a feminist writer and that seemed compelling and I'd seen her name around so I thought I'd give it a go. The book began on an upswing sketching out a family run by single moms through two generations. As the pages turn, a variety of relationships between all the women in the family and their exterior friendships/affairs are explored.
Initially, the writing seemed convincing; well put together. The first character, Suzanne, seemed sharp and in charge. Then Elena, one of the daughters, made her debut and it all went to shit. Elena is an almost entirely despicable character. The worst part about is that Piercy wants Elena to have grown on us by the end because of the positive transformation she's made within herself, except that Elena has done nothing redeemable. In fact, most all the characters in the book, even though I found moments of oblique identification with them, were pretty lousy people. The grandma is a self-interested tyrant whose political work and care for others does not extend to her own family (except Elena of all people). Suzanne is a lawyer who is only well assembled when she's arguing a case and displays the worst in women when she's not. Elena has wasted her life and wants her mommy to pay for it.
There's a theme of accountability (or lack there of) and the law. It almost came off as if Piercy wanted to test out a few of the most contentious ways women in the book could go to prison. Murder, adultery, assault, illicit drugs, pedophilia. But these ideas are carelessly explored, tiresome and sensational by the end. I skimmed paragraphs just to find out if the book made an unexpected u-turn in the direction of brilliance. It did not.
Piercy certainly has writing talent; but I felt duped as a reader, lured into a story by a ridiculous racy scandals that were not well played out. There's also the clumsiness of inserted email conversations between characters--not a fan. Elements such as these make the novel feel dated and not in a romantic way. I was also disappointed in how feminism was hinted to in various ways but how none of the female characters completely rose above their stereotypes. Although I appreciated at times the degree of candidness the writer used, I just wanted more breakthroughs, less dependance, fewer typical gendered dynamics (why do all the men have to be total losers? why do all the women have to be fundamentally alone, loveless, jaded, naive, pathetic?). It just must not be my wave of feminism--a feminism that strives to break molds, to consider the inequalities women and men are both served in a gender binary. These very interesting ideas and possibilities got thinned out and lost in a wearisome conclusion.
Maybe you should just find out which Piercy book people liked the most and read that one instead.