I almost cannot believe that I have finally read this iconic work. I don't think I can properly review it, so much as react to it. I am glad to have read it, and do recommend to occultists who are beginning to undertake more lengthy ritual work (not necessarily an Abramelin working) for specific purposes, especially if planning to do grimoire work. It was very readable and easy to comprehend.
I specifically read the Mathers translation, as this work would come to significantly influence the Golden Dawn.. I think I have read that certain parts of the manuscript were omitted? I will eventually need to compare it with another translation. I appreciated Mathers' footnotes and commentary, which are clearly biased,so the reader ought to keep that in mind.
I have avoided reading this for a long time. I concluded a long time ago that this working was a trap for the ego, that most people are being set up to fail. I'd heard stories of friend of friends experiencing terrible accidents and losing their minds in related practices. I decided that this kind of undertaking is for dire situations, like war, where extreme measures would be needed, where you would make sure to have your last will and testament written out, someone to prepare your meals and take care of your family, and also be your "spotter" if an obsession/posession emerged.
I didn't realise that this work was the foundation of Goetic workings that so influenced Crowley. I was so surprised and disappointed to see the Goetia entities listed. I'd read and heard of the Goetia before...I don't think highly of that system, and can't help but feel wary about the people interested in it. (I obviously don't know THAT much if I was blind-sighted by it's foundational manuscript.)
Ultimately, the manuscript in the beginning emphasises duty, discipline, devotion to Higher Power, humbleness, and also Fear of God. I mostly appreciated that part, especially the comment about never converting as a rejection the religion was born into, because that conversion is a rejection of the principle that all components are a microcosm of the Whole.
Six months of disciplining the mind and body in devotion are followed by communion with one's Holy Guardian Angel (this is where Crowley got the term.) Following this point, after those six months, the practicionner can proceed with particular Goetic invocations, while tapping into the authority invested in them by God & the Holy Guardian Angel.
I appreciate that this text emphasises being firm of will and structured with Goetic entities, but not torturing them or being nasty, as I've heard elsewhere.
The text is written from the perspective of a man named Abraham who is writing this for his son, Lamech. There are some points that make me critical of the time (ex .attitude about women) and about the character of Abraham and Lamech (in bestowing his son this manuscript, is Abraham not avoiding the proper method of transmission outlined in it's pages, as he recieved it? Will this not negatively impact his son?) There are other contradictions, in terms of the ethics outlined and the applications described in Abraham's personal story chapter, that I would consider very seriously before undertaking the operation.
Crowley's Liber Samekh draws heavily from the Book of Abramelin. I coincidentally was reviewing the Golden Dawn "Bornless Ritual", also related to Liber Samekh, which is modeled after an exorcism on the Greek Magical Papyri. I think there are some careful differences in between these rituals that are important to see before undertaking them on your own. I'm grateful I had good advice from teachers, and look forward to diving a bit deeper to understand the influences upon these rituals, which are now significant part of important Hermetic Orders.