What do you think?
Rate this book


Paperback
First published January 1, 1974
Some psychologists say hunting is the sport of the impotent. You can always get your gun up. For some people I'm sure it is, but since the odds in hunting are so unbalanced, I fail to see how it can be considered a manly exercise. The man who bravely faces the ferocious deer, or duck, or even bear, considering the odds, is about as manly and brave as Hitler was in invading Poland.
CP: What if this manly, brave man didn't have a gun to get up?
DC: Just so. Perhaps the single most deplorable abiding scandal in this country is its lack of gun-control laws. Any yahoo who wants to can get a gun and shoot anybody he wants to, as we see daily. The cretinous gun magazines have fought effectively for years, using the argument that gun laws are Communist plots. And they are without pity. In 1973, they tried to bring the YWCA to financial ruin because the Y dared to advocate gun laws of the sort every other civilized country in the world has. Ours are those of Dodge City. The gun magazines urged their members to boycott not only the YWCA, but also any lump-sum charity that included them. (Kill everybody in sight, while you're at it.) Them are he-men, buddy.
The funniest part, to me, is that the gun organizations, in consistently misinforming their members over the years, have helped convince the less thoughtful among them that if guns were registered, an enemy taking over America would have only to get hold of the registration records in order to locate the armed citizens...
CP: Getting back to precensorship for a moment, wasn't there also a case in which the network tried to prevent John and Yoko Lennon from singing a song on the show called "Woman Is the Nigger of the World"?
DC: The show with that song had already been taped, so it was precensorship in the sense that the network wanted to delete it before the tape could be aired the following week. Here the dialogue of the high-level meetings could, with a little rewriting, go right into a satirical revue. Given the vehemence with which this battle was waged, it was apparent that the Department of Measuring Probable Human Behavior at the network had concluded, after some overnight pulse taking of the nation's blacks, that they would march on the network as a body and that Elton Rule, the president, and Leonard Goldenson, the chairman of the board, would look undignified riding out of town on a rail sporting tar and feathers.
The meeting began, as they always do, with a net-work fellow stating that this was an irrevocable, non-negotiable decision on their part and with our announcing the same position. Then, while sandwiches were ordered, through tense smiles and through assurances on both sides that everybody could see everybody else's point of view, some sort of soul-mortgaging compromise was sought.
[...]
I replied that the sort of black who would take a network job in which his main duty was to say he was offended at times like this was not a reliable barometer. I asked whether, if I could produce eight blacks who would say they were not offended, this would cancel out his eight network blacks. Would nine? Sixteen mulattoes? This kind of impertinent retort on my part always leads to an im-passe during which I am told my argument is not the crux of the matter, and then there is a pause while people try to decide what the crux of the matter is. During this pause, I said that if I were a black I would resent being considered so predictable that a network knows ahead of time what will offend me; that this kind of pre-diction is reduction to stereotypes.
One of the network men said that his teen-age son was offended by the song (he must have meant the title, since the son couldn't have heard the song yet), and that he was no square. When I asked if he was black there was poorly feigned amusement.
My argument was that a mountain was being anticipated from a molehill, that this was not the last show I would do, that if there was unprecedented negative re-action we had the machinery to deal with it-the use of later shows, for example and why were the people who presumably would be offended more important than the vast number who might be offended by deletion of the song? When asked how they would know it had been deleted, I said that I assumed word would leak out, and that if it didn't I would help it to.
CP: History records that the song was left in. What happened?
DC: What always happens. A compromise was reached that made it possible to retain the song and impossible ever to know what the reaction would have been. I taped a little statement that was inserted into the show saying that the song was being included over the objections of some...