I am wary of time-travel books at the best of times. At the worst - well, books like The Ancient Future (even the title makes me cringe) slip under the radar. (Oh, the lure of half-off books at the Salvos.)
The first thing that strikes one as odd about this book is the language, the constant use of 'thee's and 'thou's and 'art's which are no doubt only employed to help the author distinguish between the use of english and welsh in the dialogue. For me, it was ridiculous, and confusing anyway. Needless old-fashioned language that wasn't even accurate at all, so why employ its use?
The actual style of the novel was simplistic at best - it read like a Mills & Boon novel, the way it almost listed every little fact in painful detail, or not enough detail. It didn't dwell on aspects of the plot, of the universe, of the characters (dear LORD HELP US) which could have been enhanced to make the novel that much better (it was really truly lacking).
And perhaps the most offensive thing (to this reader at least) the story tried to bind together ridiculous elements into a not at all believeable tale. The most important thing about a fantasy novel is that it has to be at least a little easy to believe. One wants to think that it could happen to them, as easily as it did the character in the novel - but mixing martial arts and the dark ages? Not to mention Harding had to go that extra bit further and add time-travelling immortals to the mix. I wasn't buying it, and neither should you.
It seemed (almost unbearably painfully so) that the author was just pressing together things she happened to like a whole lot, into a novel that had nothing in the way of a pleasing cohesion of themes (if it was sophisticated enough for themes, which I doubt in any case). Please, aspiring authors out there, write what you love - but not like this...in any way but this.
And one last thing. PEOPLE REACT TO THINGS. They don't just accept time-travelling warrior-women from the future - SERIOUSLY. They don't just welcome them into the fold. They don't leave them alone (you pretended like people were going to act like ACTUAL HUMAN BEINGS WITH SELFISH DESIRES before you projected what you wanted men to be like onto your characters, Harding, don't lie) after a few rejections, hell, they just take what they want in the dark ages. They don't accept new, world-changing laws when some queen (OF NO PROVEN NOBILITY) appeares out of NOWHERE and demands women have a better chance at life. NOT. POSSIBLE. Even in a fictional Dark Ages (DARK FREAKING AGES, not happy-go-lucky-we-only-had-one-real-battle-oh-there-were-saxons-ey?-let's-frolick-on-the-beach!-Ages) it's just not possible. No matter how many (small, insignificant) facts about history you threw into that tripe, it doesn't make up for the fact that it's just not right.
I almost want to change my rating from 2 to 1 star, but there were small things that I (admittedly, would have liked better if they were better written, elaborated on, and plotted out more) enjoyed. The story of Maelgwn's parents was interesting, and the angst of his brother an ACTUAL PROBABLE thing that would have happend. I also would have liked the whole Maelgwn/Miles thing to have been elaborated on, not glossed over as TBA when she reappears once Maelgwn is dead in 500AD, but there you have it, I don't know what happens in book 2 and 3.
4.5/10