Space Between Words: Origin of Silent Reading (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture) by Paul Saenger

by Paul Saenger

“Saenger outlined his revolutionary thesis 15 years ago in his famous essay ‘Silent Reading’; the present magisterial book retells the story step by step. . . . Paleographic studies rarely command wide audiences, but Saenger tells so important a story that Space Between Words will interest all who are concerned with the history of reading or the book.” —Choice“Saenger’s remarkable new book . . . demonstrates that . . . the scribal innovations of medieval Europe were no less seminal and far-reaching thatn those of post-Gutenberg typesetters. . . . for the first time, we see the evolution of writing, print, and computing not as a succession of fitful revolutions but, rather, as a continuum of technological innovation.”—College and Research Libraries

Genres: History, Nonfiction, Books About Books, Language

Paperback

First published December 1, 1997

Reviews

[Nick · Rating 4 out of 5]

What is reading to you? Curled up on your favourite armchair, a drink by your side, perhaps a little background music, galloping through the pages of one of your favourite authors. Well, about 700 years ago this was unimaginable. No, not because they didn't have CD players, but because reading was never silent. How did reading become silent? According to Saenger, in this thoroughly researched and fascinating study, by adding spaces between words. Until the 7th Century in Ireland, 8th in England and 12th in France, most reading had to be aloud because that was the only way that texts would make any sense. It was normal for text, which was generally Latin and most often religous, to be written in 'scriptura continua' (continuous script). With no punctuation and no spaces, the best way to make any sense out of the text was to use the wide range of endings and agreements in Latin to help read the text aloud. Don't beleive me? Try this, 1st in your head, and then aloud:
whereforeshouldistandintheplagueofcustomandpermitthecuriosityofnationstodeprivemeforthatiamsometwelveorfourteenmo
onshineslagofabrotherwhybastardwhereforebasewhenmydimensionsareaswellcompactmymindasgenerousandmyshapeastrueashon
estmadamsissuewhybrandtheyuswithbasewithbasenessbastardybasebasewhointhelustystealthofnaturetakemorecompositionan
dfiercequalitythandothwithinadullstaletiredbedgotothecreatingawholetribeoffopsgottweenasleepandwake
Even with almost no recent practice in loud reading you will probably find it more efficient to decipher aloud than in silence (if you still haven't got it, try Shakespeare's King Lear 1.II http://www.online-literature.com/shak...).
With copious examples from historical texts, Saenger not only charts the progress of spaces between words, and later punctuation marks, but also reveals the enormous impact this apparently innocuous innovation had on culture. He argues that as reading moved from the select few scribes and church leaders who would both read aloud and interpret to others sections of religous text, to a slightly larger group of privileged educated people from other walks of life, and as written text became available in the vernaculars of different regions enabling non-religous texts to be more widely distributed, the interpretation of text shifted from a social to an individual act. No longer were the church authorities around to prescribe the import of any section of the bible - alone in their room medieval nobles were able to make up their own mind. Could it be that spaces between words precipitated the French revolution?
Saenger points out that modern reading studies have revealed how spaces enable silent reading. Although we all experience a smooth flow to our reading, our eyes are busy darting around across the page in movement called saccades. Our eyes literally jump from one part of the text to another, then rest and use peripheral vision to spot the next jumping point. In general we will jump to the start of the next group of words centered on a 'content' rather than a grammatical word (such as an auxiliary verb or a determiner). Without spaces, our eyes are lost in a stream of letters.
While this may not appear to be the most interesting of subjects to many people, it demonstrates how easy it is to overlook an apparently simple part of our everyday experience and presume it is natural. Space between words are not only an invention, they could be the most important contribution to literate societies. Without the spaces between words, you would have to read this review aloud. I bet you didn't.

[Ioana Hodor · Rating 4 out of 5]

A very interesting and useful book about the evolution and usage of the space between words and its cultural, historical and sociological implications. Definitely recommend it to researchers, scholars or anyone interested in the areas of book production, history of writing, reading practices.

[Javier · Rating 3 out of 5]

I found this book fascinating. It provides an exhaustive description of the factors behind the transition from reading aloud to silent reading and the outcomes of that transition. If your curiosity is aroused and leaves you wanting more, you will find plenty of references to follow. I'm only giving it three stars: first, because of the lack of illustrations, as other reviewers have pointed out. These would have been really useful to a novice like me; and second, because of the writing style. I found myself scratching my head a few too many times. Maybe this kind of writing is beyond me, but I did find many explanations for my confusion in Pinker's Sense of Style. Altogether, this is a terrific book and will provide plenty of good conversation.

[Valia · Rating 4 out of 5]

If it had more illustrations, I would give it five stars.