What do you think?
Rate this book
Der Kuss des Einhorns
Historische Romane sind ein einträgliches Geschäft und überfluten den Buchmarkt in großer Vielfalt. Da wird es natürlich immer schwerer, ein originelles Thema zu finden, einen geschichtlichen Rahmen, der noch nicht bereits mehrfach abgegrast wurde. Tracy Chevalier scheint dieses Problem nicht zu kennen: Nach ihrem mit großer Eleganz erzählten Überraschungserfolg Das Mädchen mit dem Perlenohrring legt sie nun einen weiteren Roman vor, der gleichermaßen eigenwillig, eigenständig und ein großer Lesegenuss ist.
Im Mussée National du Moyen Âge in Paris hängen sechs Bildteppiche, auf denen eine Dame mit einem Einhorn dargestellt ist. Über diese Teppiche ist nur bekannt, dass sie aus dem späten 15. Jahrhundert stammen und mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit von dem Hofbeamten Jean Le Viste in Auftrag gegeben wurden. In Tracy Chevaliers fiktiver Rekonstruktion der Vergangenheit forderte Le Viste ursprünglich Schlachtenszenen, auf denen sein Banner im Vordergrund stehen sollte. Seine Gattin und der Künstler Nicolas des Innocents konnten ihn jedoch überzeugen, dass er bei Hofe für weit größeres Aufsehen sorgen würde, wenn er ein Minnethema gestalten ließe.
Das Werben der Dame um das Einhorn entspricht der Leidenschaft, die Jean Le Viste für schöne Frauen empfindet. Er ist ein Meister darin, den Anschein der Ehrbarkeit zu wahren und dabei auf seine Kosten zu kommen. Und er ist nicht der einzige erfolgreiche Schürzenjäger in dieser Geschichte: Auch Nicolas weiß das Herz eines Mädchens zu gefährden, so dass die Flucht ins Kloster als letzter Ausweg erscheint, ihre Jungfräulichkeit zu retten.
Mit großem psychologischen Einfühlungsvermögen und spürbarer Begeisterung für die gewählte Epoche gelingt es Tracy Chevalier, eine uns ferne Zeit heraufzubeschwören. In passenden Momenten spart sie nicht mit Detailwissen, doch in erster Linie sind es die liebenden und leidenden Figuren, die auf jeder Seite zum Lachen und Weinen anregen und die man am Schluss der Buches nur ungern zurücklässt. -- Ein großes Lob auch an den Verlag, der die Bildteppiche auf ausklappbaren Vorsatzblättern mit großem Aufwand reproduziert hat: ein tolles Buch in angemessenem Gewand. --Hannes Riffel
316 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2003
880 people are currently reading
24390 people want to read
About the author
Tracy Chevalier
76 books11.7k followersBorn:
19 October 1962 in Washington, DC. Youngest of 3 children. Father was a photographer for The Washington Post.
Childhood:
Nerdy. Spent a lot of time lying on my bed reading. Favorite authors back then: Laura Ingalls Wilder, Madeleine L’Engle, Zilpha Keatley Snyder, Joan Aiken, Susan Cooper, Lloyd Alexander. Book I would have taken to a desert island: Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery.
Education:
BA in English, Oberlin College, Ohio, 1984. No one was surprised that I went there; I was made for such a progressive, liberal place.
MA in creative writing, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, 1994. There’s a lot of debate about whether or not you can be taught to write. Why doesn’t anyone ask that of professional singers, painters, dancers? That year forced me to write all the time and take it seriously.
Geography:
Moved to London after graduating from Oberlin in 1984. I had studied for a semester in London and thought it was a great place, so came over for fun, expecting to go back to the US after 6 months to get serious. I’m still in London, and still not entirely serious. Even have dual citizenship – though I keep the American accent intact.
Family:
1 English husband + 1 English son.
Career:
Before writing, was a reference book editor, working on encyclopedias about writers. (Yup, still nerdy.) Learned how to research and how to make sentences better. Eventually I wanted to fix my own sentences rather than others’, so I quit and did the MA.
Writing:
Talked a lot about becoming a writer as a kid, but actual pen to paper contact was minimal. Started writing short stories in my 20s, then began first novel, The Virgin Blue, during the MA year. With Girl With a Pearl Earring (written in 1998), I became a full-time writer.
19 October 1962 in Washington, DC. Youngest of 3 children. Father was a photographer for The Washington Post.
Childhood:
Nerdy. Spent a lot of time lying on my bed reading. Favorite authors back then: Laura Ingalls Wilder, Madeleine L’Engle, Zilpha Keatley Snyder, Joan Aiken, Susan Cooper, Lloyd Alexander. Book I would have taken to a desert island: Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery.
Education:
BA in English, Oberlin College, Ohio, 1984. No one was surprised that I went there; I was made for such a progressive, liberal place.
MA in creative writing, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, 1994. There’s a lot of debate about whether or not you can be taught to write. Why doesn’t anyone ask that of professional singers, painters, dancers? That year forced me to write all the time and take it seriously.
Geography:
Moved to London after graduating from Oberlin in 1984. I had studied for a semester in London and thought it was a great place, so came over for fun, expecting to go back to the US after 6 months to get serious. I’m still in London, and still not entirely serious. Even have dual citizenship – though I keep the American accent intact.
Family:
1 English husband + 1 English son.
Career:
Before writing, was a reference book editor, working on encyclopedias about writers. (Yup, still nerdy.) Learned how to research and how to make sentences better. Eventually I wanted to fix my own sentences rather than others’, so I quit and did the MA.
Writing:
Talked a lot about becoming a writer as a kid, but actual pen to paper contact was minimal. Started writing short stories in my 20s, then began first novel, The Virgin Blue, during the MA year. With Girl With a Pearl Earring (written in 1998), I became a full-time writer.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,517 reviews
July 15, 2013
If I ever read the word maidenhead again in a novel, I will vomit from the flashback of reading this book.
September 12, 2025
3.5 stars rounded to 4.
December 17, 2015
Beautiful! Beautiful! Beautiful!
I found Lady and the Unicorn even better than Girl with a Pearl Earring. I felt utterly transported to the middle ages and immersed in a very good tale, immaculately told.
As she did with The Girl With the Pearl Earring, Tracy Chevalier takes a classic work of art and artfully spins a tale inspired by the original which becomes an original itself.
It was specially fascinating living among the Brussels weavers and coming to understand the magnitude of their task. One almost feels their physical discomfort and certainly the realities of a labor intensive craft. It was the part of the book I most enjoyed.
Next time I go to Paris I will not miss the Cluny Museum to see the tapestries for myself!
Meanwhile we can see them (in full size) at VanderNat's home page or at Tracy Chevalier's official site
One of the most beautifull books I have ever read :)
Now on I will look for the color blue in old tapestries with 'other eyes'. ;)
I found Lady and the Unicorn even better than Girl with a Pearl Earring. I felt utterly transported to the middle ages and immersed in a very good tale, immaculately told.
As she did with The Girl With the Pearl Earring, Tracy Chevalier takes a classic work of art and artfully spins a tale inspired by the original which becomes an original itself.
It was specially fascinating living among the Brussels weavers and coming to understand the magnitude of their task. One almost feels their physical discomfort and certainly the realities of a labor intensive craft. It was the part of the book I most enjoyed.
Next time I go to Paris I will not miss the Cluny Museum to see the tapestries for myself!
Meanwhile we can see them (in full size) at VanderNat's home page or at Tracy Chevalier's official site
One of the most beautifull books I have ever read :)
Now on I will look for the color blue in old tapestries with 'other eyes'. ;)
April 10, 2008
In the same vein as her book Girl with a Pearl Earring, The Lady and the Unicorn is a fictional account of the story surrounding the creation of the famed Lady and the Unicorn Tapestries, now housed at the Musee national du Moyen-Age (Musee Cluny) in Paris. This topic was particularly intriguing to me, since I'd seen the tapestries in person back in 2001.
While the book provides a really interesting up-close look at the design and weaving processes, I could have done with out the rest of the story, which was fairly bawdy. I didn't really care about the characters—just the tapestries. :D It's a good read if you want to find out how it was done (keeping in mind that it's not really a history book) and don't mind the bawdiness, but I wouldn't exactly recommend it to my mother.
...who of course, then received the book as a gift from a friend and read it anyway. Go figure.
While the book provides a really interesting up-close look at the design and weaving processes, I could have done with out the rest of the story, which was fairly bawdy. I didn't really care about the characters—just the tapestries. :D It's a good read if you want to find out how it was done (keeping in mind that it's not really a history book) and don't mind the bawdiness, but I wouldn't exactly recommend it to my mother.
...who of course, then received the book as a gift from a friend and read it anyway. Go figure.
June 8, 2025
This is my favorite book of Chevalier's next to the Girl with a Pearl Earring... I loved stepping into the medieval setting and learning the intricacies of creating those gorgeous tapestries I've seen hanging in the Cloisters of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The characters are great, and the story line has less tragedy, which I preferred.
(Reviewed 3/7/09)
(Reviewed 3/7/09)
November 4, 2010
I hope someone has pointed out to Tracy Chevalier that if you are going to have seven different narrators for your story, you really need to give each of them a distinctive voice. This is a major failing of this novel, which I found plodding and flat, and lacking in any genuine exploration of character or motivation. The harsh working lives of the weavers are described in some detail but the description doesn't connect with the characters. And also, if you are going to use the first person in a historical novel, try to make it fit the context, and don't describe anything as "peppered with" since peppers in this era would not have been very well known. I know that isn't a major flaw but it just added to the sense of inauthenticity.
The tapestries aren't one of my favourite works of art anyway, and the twee way in which the unicorn allegory was presented made me want to go and find a unicorn and strangle it!
The Girl with the Pearl Earring wasn't a bad read - but having read this later product, I suspect that this writer hasn't really got much more to say.
The tapestries aren't one of my favourite works of art anyway, and the twee way in which the unicorn allegory was presented made me want to go and find a unicorn and strangle it!
The Girl with the Pearl Earring wasn't a bad read - but having read this later product, I suspect that this writer hasn't really got much more to say.
April 9, 2021
"The Lady and the Unicorn" is tale about desire in all of its manifested forms. The desire to be of use, the desire to find happiness, the desire to be inspired, the desire to be free...and all centred around one of the most famous series of early Renaissance tapestries, thought to have been created around 1490 in Belgium.
The (female) characters in the novel are at once the images in the tapestries and real women, their stories woven together like a tapestry to tell the story of the creation of the tapestries. A type of mirroring of a mirroring...with the inevitable refractions, exaggerations and misinterpretations that brings with it. Very, very interesting from a thematic and symbolic standpoint!
They all can also be seen as allegorical types...just as the art of the Middle Ages / Renaissance was largely allegorical:
There is the mother whose "seul desir" is to find spiritual peace (The Seeker). There is the maiden whose "seul desir" is to be as free as she can be (The Nymph). There is the blind girl whose 'seul desir' it is to be of use and valued (The Outsider) and then there is the wife whose "seul desir" is to create like the men around her (The Artist/The Spider).
The men are allegorical as well, but damned to more mundane things like placing the order and painting the original designs.
This is my 5th Chevalier and I enjoyed it immensely, even if I had a hard time placing myself in 1490 due to the lack of concrete historical descriptions from that time. I liked this one more than "The Girl with the Pearl Earring" btw. It's much tighter in its symbolism and relevance to the theme.
The virulently negative responses by other (female) readers to the sexuality in the novel surprised me, though. Personally, I found nothing offensive in the novel, but that it was just one of the many manifestations of desire: the theme of the novel.
5 Stars
The (female) characters in the novel are at once the images in the tapestries and real women, their stories woven together like a tapestry to tell the story of the creation of the tapestries. A type of mirroring of a mirroring...with the inevitable refractions, exaggerations and misinterpretations that brings with it. Very, very interesting from a thematic and symbolic standpoint!
They all can also be seen as allegorical types...just as the art of the Middle Ages / Renaissance was largely allegorical:
There is the mother whose "seul desir" is to find spiritual peace (The Seeker). There is the maiden whose "seul desir" is to be as free as she can be (The Nymph). There is the blind girl whose 'seul desir' it is to be of use and valued (The Outsider) and then there is the wife whose "seul desir" is to create like the men around her (The Artist/The Spider).
The men are allegorical as well, but damned to more mundane things like placing the order and painting the original designs.
This is my 5th Chevalier and I enjoyed it immensely, even if I had a hard time placing myself in 1490 due to the lack of concrete historical descriptions from that time. I liked this one more than "The Girl with the Pearl Earring" btw. It's much tighter in its symbolism and relevance to the theme.
The virulently negative responses by other (female) readers to the sexuality in the novel surprised me, though. Personally, I found nothing offensive in the novel, but that it was just one of the many manifestations of desire: the theme of the novel.
5 Stars
May 24, 2025
- Libro acquistato a gennaio 2024 -
Quanto sto per scrivere a proposito del romanzo “La Dama e L’Unicorno”, romanzo edito dalla scrittrice americana Tracy Chevalier nel 2003 che ho appena terminato di leggere, è un mio pensiero molto personale: infatti ritengo, a mio modesto modo di vedere, questo romanzo superiore per qualità narrativa al precedente “La Ragazza dall’Orecchino di Perla” probabilmente perché lì, impedita e bloccata dalle pastoie della Storia e dall’ ingombrante figura di un artista famoso come Jan Vermeer, la Chevalier ha imbastito la storia abbastanza melensa della servetta innamorata segretamente dal grande artista nel contesto della creazione di un capolavoro di tutti i tempi, qui invece ha potuto liberare il meglio delle sue qualità di narratrice capace di amalgamare la storia dell’arte con personaggi di fantasia ma verosimili, spiegare attraverso i protagonisti come si produceva un arazzo nel XIV secolo, inventare una intrigante storia d’amore, creare nell’insieme una lettura istruttiva e piacevole che arricchisce la conoscenza ma regala anche una storia di affetti, di emozioni, con leggerezza e un sapiente tocco di femminilità.
Quanto sto per scrivere a proposito del romanzo “La Dama e L’Unicorno”, romanzo edito dalla scrittrice americana Tracy Chevalier nel 2003 che ho appena terminato di leggere, è un mio pensiero molto personale: infatti ritengo, a mio modesto modo di vedere, questo romanzo superiore per qualità narrativa al precedente “La Ragazza dall’Orecchino di Perla” probabilmente perché lì, impedita e bloccata dalle pastoie della Storia e dall’ ingombrante figura di un artista famoso come Jan Vermeer, la Chevalier ha imbastito la storia abbastanza melensa della servetta innamorata segretamente dal grande artista nel contesto della creazione di un capolavoro di tutti i tempi, qui invece ha potuto liberare il meglio delle sue qualità di narratrice capace di amalgamare la storia dell’arte con personaggi di fantasia ma verosimili, spiegare attraverso i protagonisti come si produceva un arazzo nel XIV secolo, inventare una intrigante storia d’amore, creare nell’insieme una lettura istruttiva e piacevole che arricchisce la conoscenza ma regala anche una storia di affetti, di emozioni, con leggerezza e un sapiente tocco di femminilità.
July 24, 2007
What I learned from this book is I should never ever read anything by this author ever again. A friend of mine was enthralled by The Virgin Blue and requested I read it. Although I hated it I thought I'd possibly give The Lady and the Unicorn a chance since I love art history. Sadly, I cannot say I liked a single thing about this book. I hated the plot, story, characters and writing style. Hated.
July 11, 2017
Από τα καλύτερα βιβλία που διάβασα το τελευταίο διάστημα!! Το ξεκίνησα εχθές με μία επιφύλαξη αλλά σήμερα που το συνέχισα διαψεύσθηκα. Η Chevalier ξεδιπλώνει μια ιστορία , με τα ελάχιστα στοιχεία που είναι γνωστά από ιστορικής άποψης, με αριστοτεχνικό τρόπο. Οι ήρωες, τα γεγονότα, όλα μπλέκονται μεταξύ τους με τέτοιον τρόπο ώστε μοιάζουν με ενιαίο σύνολο που πράγματι κάποτε συνέβη και δεν φαίνεται να αποτελούν αποκύημα της φαντασίας της συγγραφέως. Οι σελίδες κυλούν πολύ εύκολα και ενώ από την μία πλευρά εύχεσαι να τελειώσει για να μάθεις τι θα γίνει από την άλλη δεν θες να αποχωριστείς τους χαρακτήρες.
Ο Νικολά ντεζ Ινοσέν υπήρξε ο αγαπημένος μου παρά τον επιπόλαιο χαρακτήρα του. Δεν νευρίασα μαζί του και μάλιστα στεναχωρήθηκα που δεν μπόρεσε να είναι μαζί με την αγαπημένη του. Παρά τον αυθορμητισμό που τον διακατείχε και την απερισκεψία κάποιες φορές, δεν μπόρεσε να μου δημιουργήσει αρνητικά συναισθήματα. Γρήγορα μάλιστα παρατήρησα στροφή στον χαρακτήρα του , κυρίως μετά το πρώτο ταξίδι του στις Βρυξέλλες. Λυπήθηκα για τον ανεκπλήρωτο ωστόσο έρωτά του. Όπως επίσης λυπήθηκα και την Κλόντ. Μια ηρωίδα υποταγμένη στις αποφάσεις και τα θέλω της μητέρας της που αγνοούσε όμως τα αισθήματα του ίδιου της του παιδιού σκόπιμα στερώντας της την χαρά που και η ίδια δεν κατόρθωσε να ζήσει. Την αντιπάθησα τόσο πολύ που ήθελα να σκίσω τις σελίδες που διάβαζα ώρες ώρες. Έβαλε την κόρη της στο μοναστήρι για να την προστατεύσει από έναν "επικίνδυνο" ζωγράφο που, κατά την γνώμη μου, αγαπούσε αληθινά την νεαρή κοπέλα. Ήταν ασυγχώρητη. Υποτίθεται ό,τι έκανε ήταν προς όφελος της Κλόντ αλλά μόνο έτσι δεν ήταν τα πράγματα. Ήθελε να στερήσει την χαρά και την αγάπη από την κόρη της για έναν απλό λόγο (που και η ίδια γνώριζε): την ζήλια. Που η Κλόντ βρήκε κάποιον να αγαπά και που την αγαπάει εν αντιθέση με εκείνη που έμεινε δεσμευμένη σε έναν αποτυχημένο γάμο. Οι καλές προθέσεις της φάνηκαν και στο τέλος εξάλλου καθώς αφήνεται να εννοηθεί πως ούτε η Κλόντ αλλά ούτε και ο Νικολά έζησαν ευτυχισμένοι.
Παρά το τέλος , το βιβλίο μου άφησε μια ευχάριστη αίσθηση και την επιθυμία να διαβάσω και άλλα βιβλία της συγγραφέως !
Ο Νικολά ντεζ Ινοσέν υπήρξε ο αγαπημένος μου παρά τον επιπόλαιο χαρακτήρα του. Δεν νευρίασα μαζί του και μάλιστα στεναχωρήθηκα που δεν μπόρεσε να είναι μαζί με την αγαπημένη του. Παρά τον αυθορμητισμό που τον διακατείχε και την απερισκεψία κάποιες φορές, δεν μπόρεσε να μου δημιουργήσει αρνητικά συναισθήματα. Γρήγορα μάλιστα παρατήρησα στροφή στον χαρακτήρα του , κυρίως μετά το πρώτο ταξίδι του στις Βρυξέλλες. Λυπήθηκα για τον ανεκπλήρωτο ωστόσο έρωτά του. Όπως επίσης λυπήθηκα και την Κλόντ. Μια ηρωίδα υποταγμένη στις αποφάσεις και τα θέλω της μητέρας της που αγνοούσε όμως τα αισθήματα του ίδιου της του παιδιού σκόπιμα στερώντας της την χαρά που και η ίδια δεν κατόρθωσε να ζήσει. Την αντιπάθησα τόσο πολύ που ήθελα να σκίσω τις σελίδες που διάβαζα ώρες ώρες. Έβαλε την κόρη της στο μοναστήρι για να την προστατεύσει από έναν "επικίνδυνο" ζωγράφο που, κατά την γνώμη μου, αγαπούσε αληθινά την νεαρή κοπέλα. Ήταν ασυγχώρητη. Υποτίθεται ό,τι έκανε ήταν προς όφελος της Κλόντ αλλά μόνο έτσι δεν ήταν τα πράγματα. Ήθελε να στερήσει την χαρά και την αγάπη από την κόρη της για έναν απλό λόγο (που και η ίδια γνώριζε): την ζήλια. Που η Κλόντ βρήκε κάποιον να αγαπά και που την αγαπάει εν αντιθέση με εκείνη που έμεινε δεσμευμένη σε έναν αποτυχημένο γάμο. Οι καλές προθέσεις της φάνηκαν και στο τέλος εξάλλου καθώς αφήνεται να εννοηθεί πως ούτε η Κλόντ αλλά ούτε και ο Νικολά έζησαν ευτυχισμένοι.
Παρά το τέλος , το βιβλίο μου άφησε μια ευχάριστη αίσθηση και την επιθυμία να διαβάσω και άλλα βιβλία της συγγραφέως !
May 4, 2019
I suppose that's how you write historical fiction (looking at you, Simone van der Vlugt!)
The Brussels section is glorious, with all the weaving details and the particulars of the craft. I'm beyond amazed each time an author takes the hard way and engages in lots of research, such as tapestry techniques in the Middle Ages—setting up looms, threads, colours, dyeing methods and all that jazz—and manages to bring everything together in an enthralling narrative. Also, I'm constantly amazed at how incredibly well the craft guilds were organized in Medieval Flanders.
The Paris section is a bit trivial, but somewhat appropriate, I guess?
Unfortunately, I didn't connect with any of the characters (definitely didn't root for the unlikely pair), but having the story told from multiple pov certainly helped with shaping and depth.
The Brussels section is glorious, with all the weaving details and the particulars of the craft. I'm beyond amazed each time an author takes the hard way and engages in lots of research, such as tapestry techniques in the Middle Ages—setting up looms, threads, colours, dyeing methods and all that jazz—and manages to bring everything together in an enthralling narrative. Also, I'm constantly amazed at how incredibly well the craft guilds were organized in Medieval Flanders.
The Paris section is a bit trivial, but somewhat appropriate, I guess?
Unfortunately, I didn't connect with any of the characters (definitely didn't root for the unlikely pair), but having the story told from multiple pov certainly helped with shaping and depth.
August 14, 2012
I am impressed. I never thought this book would be as lovely as Girl with a Pearl Earring: http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...! First let me just explain that this is a book of historical fiction. In the Museé National du Moyen-Age we can today see the Lady and the Unicorn tapestries. They are six tapestries, each representing one of our five senses:
sight, sound, smell, touch, taste and the sixth, that one is known as Á Mon Seul Désir, for these words are found woven there. In English the translation would be: my one, sole desire. Think about those words in conjunction with the theme of the other tapestries and imagine what they might mean. In any case, the tapestries and this book must be about seduction. Or is it about forgoing sensual pleasures? One cannot see if the women is putting in or taking out the jewels.
Little is known of these wool and silk tapestries except that they were woven at the end of the 1400s, probably in Flanders. They were commissioned by the Le Visté family, since the banner is visible in all six of the tapestries. Tracy Chevalier weaves a credible story about these tapestries: Jean Le Visté, a fifteenth-century nobleman, close to the French King Charles VII, commissions Nicolas des Innocents, a talented miniaturist, tantalized by the charms of several beautiful women - maids, ladies-in-waiting and even Jean Le Visté’s daughter and wife, too. The tapestries are woven in Brussels by the renown weaver Georges de la Chapelle. The story captures the lives and times of noblemen and the guilds’ craftsmen living in Brussels and Paris at the end of the 1400s.
Tracy Chevalier, the author, has done her homework. She knows these cities, the craftsmen and these times – down to the smallest details. She knows that in Brussels it is the early summer sun that shines the hottest:
I sat back on my heels and raised my face to the sun. Early summer is good for sun, as it is directly overhead for longer during the day. I have always loved heat, though not from the fire. Fires scare me. I have singed my skirts too often by the fire.
‘Will you pick me a strawberry, Mademoiselle?’ Nicolas asked. ‘I have a thirst.’
‘They’re not ripe yet,’ I snapped. I had meant to sound pleasant but he made me feel strange. And he was talking too loudly. People often do when they discover I am blind….. (pages 110-111: a short interchange of words between Nicolas and Aliénor de la Chapelle, the pretty, but blind daughter of Geroges de la Chapelle)
Already we know by 100 pages that Nicolas has impregnated a maid in Paris, been under a table doing naughty things with fourteen-year-old Claude, the daughter of Jean Le Visté, and flirted with her mother, Geneviève de Nanterre. What more mischief and indeed with whom will we find Nicolas? Each character has a clear identity. There is rivalry between mother and daughter; there is jealousy and love too. Each of the women came alive. There is Aliénor the blind girl. There is Christine du Sablon, the wife of Georges and mother of Aliénor. Each of the women and also the men relate the events. Different chapters relate different characters’ thoughts. Each of the individuals has a different perspective. Each has their own problems, personality and standing and thus they cannot have the same view. I loved the blind girl’s thoughts. I also appreciated the two different mother daughter relationships. For me, there was a lot to consider. I love the playful seduction scenes. I love the authenticity of the descriptions. I know Brussels and the author describes the city perfectly. The details are interwoven into the tale of families. There is a wife that has given birth to only three daughters, and that is quite a failing when it is a son that is needed to carry on the family name. This novel is about not only the tapestries but also about women, several very different women. So while we learn history about these tapestries and times we also delve into familiar family relationships. The book is about rivalry between mothers and daughters, lost love between a husband and wife and about the life of women as they age. What makes it wonderful to read is the author’s ability to evoke different places and characters convincingly.
sight, sound, smell, touch, taste and the sixth, that one is known as Á Mon Seul Désir, for these words are found woven there. In English the translation would be: my one, sole desire. Think about those words in conjunction with the theme of the other tapestries and imagine what they might mean. In any case, the tapestries and this book must be about seduction. Or is it about forgoing sensual pleasures? One cannot see if the women is putting in or taking out the jewels.
Little is known of these wool and silk tapestries except that they were woven at the end of the 1400s, probably in Flanders. They were commissioned by the Le Visté family, since the banner is visible in all six of the tapestries. Tracy Chevalier weaves a credible story about these tapestries: Jean Le Visté, a fifteenth-century nobleman, close to the French King Charles VII, commissions Nicolas des Innocents, a talented miniaturist, tantalized by the charms of several beautiful women - maids, ladies-in-waiting and even Jean Le Visté’s daughter and wife, too. The tapestries are woven in Brussels by the renown weaver Georges de la Chapelle. The story captures the lives and times of noblemen and the guilds’ craftsmen living in Brussels and Paris at the end of the 1400s.
Tracy Chevalier, the author, has done her homework. She knows these cities, the craftsmen and these times – down to the smallest details. She knows that in Brussels it is the early summer sun that shines the hottest:
I sat back on my heels and raised my face to the sun. Early summer is good for sun, as it is directly overhead for longer during the day. I have always loved heat, though not from the fire. Fires scare me. I have singed my skirts too often by the fire.
‘Will you pick me a strawberry, Mademoiselle?’ Nicolas asked. ‘I have a thirst.’
‘They’re not ripe yet,’ I snapped. I had meant to sound pleasant but he made me feel strange. And he was talking too loudly. People often do when they discover I am blind….. (pages 110-111: a short interchange of words between Nicolas and Aliénor de la Chapelle, the pretty, but blind daughter of Geroges de la Chapelle)
Already we know by 100 pages that Nicolas has impregnated a maid in Paris, been under a table doing naughty things with fourteen-year-old Claude, the daughter of Jean Le Visté, and flirted with her mother, Geneviève de Nanterre. What more mischief and indeed with whom will we find Nicolas? Each character has a clear identity. There is rivalry between mother and daughter; there is jealousy and love too. Each of the women came alive. There is Aliénor the blind girl. There is Christine du Sablon, the wife of Georges and mother of Aliénor. Each of the women and also the men relate the events. Different chapters relate different characters’ thoughts. Each of the individuals has a different perspective. Each has their own problems, personality and standing and thus they cannot have the same view. I loved the blind girl’s thoughts. I also appreciated the two different mother daughter relationships. For me, there was a lot to consider. I love the playful seduction scenes. I love the authenticity of the descriptions. I know Brussels and the author describes the city perfectly. The details are interwoven into the tale of families. There is a wife that has given birth to only three daughters, and that is quite a failing when it is a son that is needed to carry on the family name. This novel is about not only the tapestries but also about women, several very different women. So while we learn history about these tapestries and times we also delve into familiar family relationships. The book is about rivalry between mothers and daughters, lost love between a husband and wife and about the life of women as they age. What makes it wonderful to read is the author’s ability to evoke different places and characters convincingly.
April 28, 2012
Was hoping to enjoy The Lady and the Unicorn after reading Burning Bright a few years earlier, which is, to be honest, far superior to this. After the action moves away from the Le Viste family, it kind of goes downhill from there. Nicholas is thoroughly unlikeable as a character (whether this was meant to be deliberate or not, I couldn't tell). The only interesting person was Genevieve de Nanterre. Also, what's the deal with Chevalier missing out on the chance to use Jean Le Viste's narrative voice? He is the reason the tapestry is made at all, but we only get a few glimpses of him being little more than a stereotype (of the "I'm-so-damn-important-that-I'll-blame-my-lack-of-an-heir-on-my-wife-simply-because-no-one-will-dare-argue-with-me" variety) and all round bastard. Aside from all this, the writing is clunky. Nicholas leers after any woman with a pulse (including fourteen year old girls) and comes out with cringeworthy lines such as "The sight of her tongue made me hard. I wanted to plough her" and "Come closer, my dear, and see my plums. Squeeze them." Had the writing been less like a Mills & Boon novel it could have just about saved this book. Oh, well. I'm hoping Remarkable Creatures is going to turn out better.
February 22, 2017
Everyone was kind of an idiot in this one.
We have the stuck up nobleman who thinks he is all that.
We have the artist who thinks he is god's gift to women. Ugh, what an ass. I wanted to slap him.
The nobleman's stupid daughter, God, what an idiot.
Then we moved on to Brussels to see the tapestry being made. Ok, that family was better. The daughter was better, but still, oh girl.
I think the only sane person was the maid for the rich family. Sure she made mistakes too, but, I understood her.
But the book was good. Nice setting, even if I wish that stupid artist had not been it.
We have the stuck up nobleman who thinks he is all that.
We have the artist who thinks he is god's gift to women. Ugh, what an ass. I wanted to slap him.
The nobleman's stupid daughter, God, what an idiot.
Then we moved on to Brussels to see the tapestry being made. Ok, that family was better. The daughter was better, but still, oh girl.
I think the only sane person was the maid for the rich family. Sure she made mistakes too, but, I understood her.
But the book was good. Nice setting, even if I wish that stupid artist had not been it.
November 22, 2011
This book reminded me of why I typically try to have as few preconceptions about novels as possible -- I avoid the summaries on the inside flap/back cover, rarely read reviews past the first few lines, and never examine cover art too closely. Otherwise, I start forming expectations of plot lines, style, and tone for the book, and usually end up (perhaps unfairly) disappointed when the book doesn't measure up.
All that to say, I've seen the tapestries on which this book is based, and I was really hoping for a better story than Chevalier has given them. I got to spend quite a while in the tapestries' special room in the Musée national de Moyen Age, and between the moody archival lighting, the exhibit design, and the impressive presence of the tapestries themselves, I left with a strong sense that these were artifacts of consequence.
So, to have much of the story boil down to, "Well, there's this artist, and he really wants to get into some ladies' pants. . ." was frustrating. I would have much preferred to read more about the mechanics of weaving, the symbolism of the tapestries, and the politics and economics of creating a work of art like this. The story actually had all of these elements, but the characters felt silly and shallow, and I just didn't care if the fictional cartoonist got to sleep with any of the women he chased, or if the weaver's blind daughter ended up marrying the smelly woad-dyer.
I certainly see the appeal in taking something as grand as these tapestries and giving them a frivolous backstory, but since I'd already been won over to the Fuck Yeah, Tapestries! team, I was simply not in the mood for it this time.
All that to say, I've seen the tapestries on which this book is based, and I was really hoping for a better story than Chevalier has given them. I got to spend quite a while in the tapestries' special room in the Musée national de Moyen Age, and between the moody archival lighting, the exhibit design, and the impressive presence of the tapestries themselves, I left with a strong sense that these were artifacts of consequence.
So, to have much of the story boil down to, "Well, there's this artist, and he really wants to get into some ladies' pants. . ." was frustrating. I would have much preferred to read more about the mechanics of weaving, the symbolism of the tapestries, and the politics and economics of creating a work of art like this. The story actually had all of these elements, but the characters felt silly and shallow, and I just didn't care if the fictional cartoonist got to sleep with any of the women he chased, or if the weaver's blind daughter ended up marrying the smelly woad-dyer.
I certainly see the appeal in taking something as grand as these tapestries and giving them a frivolous backstory, but since I'd already been won over to the Fuck Yeah, Tapestries! team, I was simply not in the mood for it this time.
August 18, 2013
Forse uno dei migliori libri della Chevalier. L’autrice possiede la capacità di farti immergere nel romanzo attraverso la descrizione dell’epoca storica, dell’analisi dei personaggi, delle loro vicende, degli arazzi, dei colori, dei profumi. Tramite la descrizione molto accurata e molto interessante della realizzazione degli arazzi, che rappresentano i cinque sensi, vengono coinvolti anche i nostri, e ciò ci aiuta ad immaginare meglio le scene descritte dall’autrice. I personaggi sono magnificamente descritti, insieme ai loro sentimenti, sensazioni e pensieri.
Il romanzo viene raccontato in prima persona dai vari personaggi e da ciò traspaiono le condizioni della popolazione, della donna, degli usi e costumi di un’epoca ormai lontana.
Il libro è scritto molto bene, scorrevole e coinvolgente come tutti gli altri di questa bravissima autrice.
Il romanzo viene raccontato in prima persona dai vari personaggi e da ciò traspaiono le condizioni della popolazione, della donna, degli usi e costumi di un’epoca ormai lontana.
Il libro è scritto molto bene, scorrevole e coinvolgente come tutti gli altri di questa bravissima autrice.
February 5, 2021
I enjoyed this book but did' not care much for the protagonist, the womanising and arrogant artist , Nicholas DE Innocents, but this is also about a noble Parisian family and a Brussels tradesman and his family in the late 15th century. An essay on relations between men and woman at they type, and a lot of symbolism between the characters in the book and the figures of the tapestry which is commissioned by a Parisian nobleman.
Something to learn about tapestry making but does not deal with it in the same detail that say Irving Stone dealt marble in The Agony and The Ecstasy.
Tracy Chevalier is a brilliant word-smith who brings to life the sights and sounds and emotions and activities of the period pieces she specializes in. Her novel written after this Burning Bright is even better than this one
Something to learn about tapestry making but does not deal with it in the same detail that say Irving Stone dealt marble in The Agony and The Ecstasy.
Tracy Chevalier is a brilliant word-smith who brings to life the sights and sounds and emotions and activities of the period pieces she specializes in. Her novel written after this Burning Bright is even better than this one
June 8, 2011
Sekumpulan permadani ditemukan pada tahun 1841 oleh Prosper Mérimée, seorang dramawan, sejarawan, dan arkeolog Prancis bersama dengan temannya, George Sand. Mereka menemukannya ketika menginap di Château de Boussac Prancis tengah. Ternyata permadani itu bukan sembarang permadani, itu adalah permadani dari abad pertengahan yang akhirnya membawa kontribusi besar pada sejarah abad pertengahan Prancis.
Siapa sebenarnya perancang atau pembuat permadani ini sebenarnya tidak diketahui. Tracy Chevalier 'membungkus' sejarah pembuatan enam permadani tersebut dengan kisah fiksi yang terjadi pada abad 15. Tidak semuanya fiksi, Tracy menuliskan di bagian akhir novel ini bahwa ia berusaha tetap setia pada sedikit fakta yang diketahui, termasuk membaca sumber-sumber sejarah abad pertengahan.
Tracy membagi tokoh-tokoh dalam novel ini menjadi 3 bagian. Pertama adalah keluarga bangsawan, yaitu Jean Le Viste. Istrinya: Genevieve De Nanterre. Anaknya: Claude Le Viste, Kedua adalah perancang dan makelar, yaitu Nicolas Des Innocents sebagai perancang sketsa, dan Leon Le Vieux sebagai makelar antara Jean Le Viste dan Nicholas. Ketiga adalah keluarga penenun permadani yaitu Georges De La Chapelle sebagai pemilik usaha pembuatan permadani, Christine Du Sablon (istri Georges De La Chapelle) , Aleinor De La Chapelle (anak perempuan Georges), Georges Le Jeune (anak laki-laki Georges) , Philippe De La Tour (bekerja pada Georges).
Jean Le Viste diceritakan sebagai bangsawan yang sangat dekat dengan Raja Louis XI. Ia ingin memperingati kenaikan pangkatnya dengan membuat permadani. Permadani itu akan dipajang di sebuah ruangan khusus. Awalnya, Jean Le Viste ingin menampilkan lambang keluarga yang berlatar belakang pertempuran. Unsur-unsur yang dikehendaki Le Viste yaitu: kuda-kuda, para lelaki dalam pakaian perang, panji-panji, tombak, pedang, perisai, dan darah. Namun, menurut pandangan Christine (istri Le Viste), gambar pertempuran sangat tidak elok dipajang di ruang rumah mereka. Karena itu ia mengusulkan lewat Nicholas, agar mengubah rancangan awal tadi dengan gambar anak perempuan mereka, Claude dengan binatang kesayangan Claude, yaitu Unicorn.
Usulan gambar yang baru dibuat. Jean Le Viste setuju, namun memberi batas waktu dua tahun untuk mengerjakan 6 permadani. Hal itu disanggupi oleh Leon dan Nicholas. Bagi mereka, hal itu akan menambah pundi-pundi kekayaan mereka, sebab Jean membayar sangat mahal demi sebuah prestise tersebut.
Leon dan Nicholas membawa hasil sketsa tersebut ke bengkel penenun permadani terkenal di Brussel (Belgia). Mereka memutuskan menyerahkan pekerjaan tersebut pada keluarga Georges De La Chapelle. Leon tidak percaya bahwa sketsanya akan dikerjakan sesuai dengan keinginannya. Karena itu, ia sekali waktu datang dari Prancis ke Brussel untuk memastikan apakah permadani tersebut telah selesai dikerjakan termasuk memastikan apakah sketsa yang ia buat telah sesuai dengan pengerjaannya.
Nicolas Des Innocents si pelukis ternyata bukanlah The Innocent seperti namanya. Sebelum menerima pekerjaan dari tuan Viste, ia adalah pelukis wanita dan pelukis miniatur. Karena itu, tawaran melukis pertempuran adalah seseuatu hal di luar kebiasaannya. Ia berpikiran sama dengan Christine, bahwa tidak perlu melukis pertempuran. Christine berpikiran bahwa memajang lukisan pertempuran di rumah mereka akan menyinggung perasaan prajurit yang bertempur, sementara suaminya tidaklah melakukan pertempuran. Sedangkan dari sisi Nicholas, ia menyenangi melukis wanita, karena ia juga sangat menyukai wanita namun untuk dibawa ke tempat tidur. Tema permadani "The Lady and The Unicorn" akhirnya ditentukan. Nicholas membagi tema The Lady and The Unicorn dalam 6 bagian. Bagian-bagian tersebut adalah
Tracy menulis novel ini dari berbagai sudut pandang tokoh. Karena dari berbagai sudut pandang, pembaca dapat mengetahui bagaimana tokoh tersebut menghadapi atau menyikapi suatu persoalan. Sederhananya, pembaca serasa menonton film. Contohnya bagaimana ketika Nicholas memandang Claude dan Genevieve yang akan dijadikan model dalam permadaninya:
Ketika Claude menyadari bahwa dirinyalah yang dilukis Nicholas:
Ketika Genevieve menyadari bahwa sulitnya ia mengatur putri sulungnya:
Owkey...sekarang mari kita lihat masing-masing gambar pada permadani itu. Sumber gambar ini saya peroleh dari Musée National du Moyen Age, dimana Pemerintah Prancis membeli dan menyimpan permadani tersebut di tempat ini.
1. "Taste"-Peraba: Singa dan unicorn berada di sisi Lady. Burung kakaktua ada di tangan kiri Lady sementara Lady mengambil sesuatu (sepertinya permen) dari keranjang dayangnya. Ada seperti anjing kecil di dekat kakinya.Saya bingung kenapa bendera yang di sebelah kanan bisa berdiri, padahal unicorn-nya sedang berdiri pada dua kaki.
2. "Sight"-Penglihatan : Sang unicorn sedang melihat cermin di kaki Lady.
3. "Touch"-Peraba : Lady, berpakaian bagus, memegang bendera dan memegang tanduk Unicorn.
4. "Smell"-Pencium : the Lady membuat rantai bunga. Monyet di belakangnya menghirup aroma bunga mawar.
5. "Hearing"-Pendengar : Lady memainkan organ di atas meja yang ditutupi karpet turki. Singa dan Unicorn berada di masing-masing sisi organ. Hanya pada gambar ini Unicorn dan singa bertukar tempat.
6. " To My Only Desire"-A mon seul désir: Ini tidak berkaitan dengan semua indra, apakah itu berarti indra keenam? Lady memberikan (atau mengambil?) kalung ke (dari) peti perhiasan yang disiapkan dayang. Tidak diketahui apakah gambar ini memang urutan pertama atau urutan terakhir karena gambar ini tidak "setema" dengan 5 gambar lainnya. Tema utamanya tetap Lady dan Unicorn. Sepertinya yang menjadi fokus adalah kalung perhiasan Lady, kepada yang paling diingininya. Di setiap gambar, Sang Lady berganti kostum, namun kostum tersebut menunjukkan kemewahan dan keanggunan. Satu-satunya yang ada tendanya juga pada gambar ini. Apakah yang mau diberikan adalah tendanya? (perhatikan ada tulisan A mon seul désir). Ciri utama gambar abad pertengahan adalah adanya "panggung" tempat berdiri tokoh-tokoh yang digambarkan berbunga-bunga, serta latar belakang dengan cabang/dahan yang mekar. Keseluruhan permadani ini dibuat dengan gaya mille-fleurs (berarti: "ribuan bunga").
Untuk melihat silsilah keluarga De Viste, bisa ditelusuri di web keluarga mereka di sini Jean Le Viste dalam novel ini adalah generasi keempat. Pernikahan Jean dengan Geneviève memberikan tiga putri: Claude, Jeanne, and petite Geneviève. Ada banyak hal lagi tentang isi novel ini yang dibahas dalam webnya Tracy, silakan bagi yang berminat untuk menelusurinya di sini. Ini mungkin yang menarik, Tracy memberikan informasi yang tak tertulis di bukunya, namun menyediakannya di web pribadi.
Tracy dengan apik memberikan pengetahuan tentang abad pertengahan. Selain itu ia menceritakan suasana penenunan permadani kepada pembaca. Sebagai penulis kreatif ia memadukan pengetahuan lukisan, penenunan, kehidupan bangsawan, kehidupan biara. Ia memang serius dalam penulisan setiap novelnya. Untuk novel ini, ia membaca banyak buku serta mengunjungi museum dan tempat pembuatan permadani untuk mendapat feel pekerjaan itu. Mungkin karena itu juga cerita pada bagian melukis dan menenun, Tracy menuliskannya dengan mendetil. Bagi kita yang belum pernah punya pengalaman visual sebelumnya, tentunya akan sulit berimajinasi.
Terjemahan novel ini juga banyak mempertahankan istilah-istilah dalam Bahasa Prancis. Mungkin lebih baik jika ada keterangan singkat tentang apa maksud/arti istilah-istilah seperti n'est-ce pas?, millefleur. Atau itu mungkin salah satu siasat supaya pembaca harus mencari sendiri? Hmmm...boleh jadi :)
Tracy Chevalier lahir tahun 1962 and besar di Washington, DC. Ia memeroleh gelar Bachelor (in English) dari Oberlin College, Ohio. Setelah itu ia memeroleh gelar Master of Art di bidang creative writing dari the University of East Anglia, Norwich, England. Ia terkenal sebagai penulis novel fiksi sejarah. Novelnya antara lain Remarkable Creatures (2009), Burning Bright (2007), The Lady and the Unicorn (2003), Falling Angels (2001), Girl With a Pearl Earring (1999), dan The Virgin Blue (1997).
Pekerjaan utamanya ialah menulis dan menjadi mengurus rumah tangga. Ia sangat menikmati profesi sebagai penulis. Ia mengatakan: Luckily writing is a flexible profession – I decide my schedule, and I can take as long as I need – for the most part.
Selain gelar master di bidang kepenulisan dan telah menulis novel-novel best seller, ia memberikan tips menulis pada penulis pemula:
* Don’t write about what you know – write about what you’re interested in.
* Don’t write about yourself – you aren’t as interesting as you think! There’s a whole world out there to explore.
* Be very critical – your writing can always be improved. Revise, then revise again, and again.
@hws08062011
Siapa sebenarnya perancang atau pembuat permadani ini sebenarnya tidak diketahui. Tracy Chevalier 'membungkus' sejarah pembuatan enam permadani tersebut dengan kisah fiksi yang terjadi pada abad 15. Tidak semuanya fiksi, Tracy menuliskan di bagian akhir novel ini bahwa ia berusaha tetap setia pada sedikit fakta yang diketahui, termasuk membaca sumber-sumber sejarah abad pertengahan.
Tracy membagi tokoh-tokoh dalam novel ini menjadi 3 bagian. Pertama adalah keluarga bangsawan, yaitu Jean Le Viste. Istrinya: Genevieve De Nanterre. Anaknya: Claude Le Viste, Kedua adalah perancang dan makelar, yaitu Nicolas Des Innocents sebagai perancang sketsa, dan Leon Le Vieux sebagai makelar antara Jean Le Viste dan Nicholas. Ketiga adalah keluarga penenun permadani yaitu Georges De La Chapelle sebagai pemilik usaha pembuatan permadani, Christine Du Sablon (istri Georges De La Chapelle) , Aleinor De La Chapelle (anak perempuan Georges), Georges Le Jeune (anak laki-laki Georges) , Philippe De La Tour (bekerja pada Georges).
Jean Le Viste diceritakan sebagai bangsawan yang sangat dekat dengan Raja Louis XI. Ia ingin memperingati kenaikan pangkatnya dengan membuat permadani. Permadani itu akan dipajang di sebuah ruangan khusus. Awalnya, Jean Le Viste ingin menampilkan lambang keluarga yang berlatar belakang pertempuran. Unsur-unsur yang dikehendaki Le Viste yaitu: kuda-kuda, para lelaki dalam pakaian perang, panji-panji, tombak, pedang, perisai, dan darah. Namun, menurut pandangan Christine (istri Le Viste), gambar pertempuran sangat tidak elok dipajang di ruang rumah mereka. Karena itu ia mengusulkan lewat Nicholas, agar mengubah rancangan awal tadi dengan gambar anak perempuan mereka, Claude dengan binatang kesayangan Claude, yaitu Unicorn.
Usulan gambar yang baru dibuat. Jean Le Viste setuju, namun memberi batas waktu dua tahun untuk mengerjakan 6 permadani. Hal itu disanggupi oleh Leon dan Nicholas. Bagi mereka, hal itu akan menambah pundi-pundi kekayaan mereka, sebab Jean membayar sangat mahal demi sebuah prestise tersebut.
Leon dan Nicholas membawa hasil sketsa tersebut ke bengkel penenun permadani terkenal di Brussel (Belgia). Mereka memutuskan menyerahkan pekerjaan tersebut pada keluarga Georges De La Chapelle. Leon tidak percaya bahwa sketsanya akan dikerjakan sesuai dengan keinginannya. Karena itu, ia sekali waktu datang dari Prancis ke Brussel untuk memastikan apakah permadani tersebut telah selesai dikerjakan termasuk memastikan apakah sketsa yang ia buat telah sesuai dengan pengerjaannya.
Nicolas Des Innocents si pelukis ternyata bukanlah The Innocent seperti namanya. Sebelum menerima pekerjaan dari tuan Viste, ia adalah pelukis wanita dan pelukis miniatur. Karena itu, tawaran melukis pertempuran adalah seseuatu hal di luar kebiasaannya. Ia berpikiran sama dengan Christine, bahwa tidak perlu melukis pertempuran. Christine berpikiran bahwa memajang lukisan pertempuran di rumah mereka akan menyinggung perasaan prajurit yang bertempur, sementara suaminya tidaklah melakukan pertempuran. Sedangkan dari sisi Nicholas, ia menyenangi melukis wanita, karena ia juga sangat menyukai wanita namun untuk dibawa ke tempat tidur. Tema permadani "The Lady and The Unicorn" akhirnya ditentukan. Nicholas membagi tema The Lady and The Unicorn dalam 6 bagian. Bagian-bagian tersebut adalah
Tracy menulis novel ini dari berbagai sudut pandang tokoh. Karena dari berbagai sudut pandang, pembaca dapat mengetahui bagaimana tokoh tersebut menghadapi atau menyikapi suatu persoalan. Sederhananya, pembaca serasa menonton film. Contohnya bagaimana ketika Nicholas memandang Claude dan Genevieve yang akan dijadikan model dalam permadaninya:
Sebenarnya bukan hanya ia (Jean Le Viste) yang ingin kubuat terkesan, tapi juga istri dan anaknya. Aku tak yakin mana yang lebih menggugahku-Wajah cantik Claude atau wajah murung Genevieve. Barangkali bakal ada cukup ruang bagi keduanya di hutan si Unicorn
Ketika Claude menyadari bahwa dirinyalah yang dilukis Nicholas:
Lama kutatap gambar tersebut. Aku tak bisa mengalihkan pandanganku atau memindahkan gambar itu untuk melihat gambar selanjutnya. Ia telah melukisku. Ia memikirkanku seperti aku memikirkannya. Dadaku berdesir. mon seul désir
Ketika Genevieve menyadari bahwa sulitnya ia mengatur putri sulungnya:
Aku lelah memikirkan Claude. Aku lelah mengkhawatirkan apa yang akan terjadi padanya, sementara dia sendiri jelas-jelas tidak peduli pada dirinya sendiri. Untuk sesaat aku bahkan tergoda untuk mendorongnya ke pelukan pelukis itu dan menutup pintu rapat-rapat bagi mereka berdua selamanya. Tentu saja aku tak bisa melakukan hal itu...
Owkey...sekarang mari kita lihat masing-masing gambar pada permadani itu. Sumber gambar ini saya peroleh dari Musée National du Moyen Age, dimana Pemerintah Prancis membeli dan menyimpan permadani tersebut di tempat ini.
1. "Taste"-Peraba: Singa dan unicorn berada di sisi Lady. Burung kakaktua ada di tangan kiri Lady sementara Lady mengambil sesuatu (sepertinya permen) dari keranjang dayangnya. Ada seperti anjing kecil di dekat kakinya.Saya bingung kenapa bendera yang di sebelah kanan bisa berdiri, padahal unicorn-nya sedang berdiri pada dua kaki.
2. "Sight"-Penglihatan : Sang unicorn sedang melihat cermin di kaki Lady.
3. "Touch"-Peraba : Lady, berpakaian bagus, memegang bendera dan memegang tanduk Unicorn.
4. "Smell"-Pencium : the Lady membuat rantai bunga. Monyet di belakangnya menghirup aroma bunga mawar.
5. "Hearing"-Pendengar : Lady memainkan organ di atas meja yang ditutupi karpet turki. Singa dan Unicorn berada di masing-masing sisi organ. Hanya pada gambar ini Unicorn dan singa bertukar tempat.
6. " To My Only Desire"-A mon seul désir: Ini tidak berkaitan dengan semua indra, apakah itu berarti indra keenam? Lady memberikan (atau mengambil?) kalung ke (dari) peti perhiasan yang disiapkan dayang. Tidak diketahui apakah gambar ini memang urutan pertama atau urutan terakhir karena gambar ini tidak "setema" dengan 5 gambar lainnya. Tema utamanya tetap Lady dan Unicorn. Sepertinya yang menjadi fokus adalah kalung perhiasan Lady, kepada yang paling diingininya. Di setiap gambar, Sang Lady berganti kostum, namun kostum tersebut menunjukkan kemewahan dan keanggunan. Satu-satunya yang ada tendanya juga pada gambar ini. Apakah yang mau diberikan adalah tendanya? (perhatikan ada tulisan A mon seul désir). Ciri utama gambar abad pertengahan adalah adanya "panggung" tempat berdiri tokoh-tokoh yang digambarkan berbunga-bunga, serta latar belakang dengan cabang/dahan yang mekar. Keseluruhan permadani ini dibuat dengan gaya mille-fleurs (berarti: "ribuan bunga").
Untuk melihat silsilah keluarga De Viste, bisa ditelusuri di web keluarga mereka di sini Jean Le Viste dalam novel ini adalah generasi keempat. Pernikahan Jean dengan Geneviève memberikan tiga putri: Claude, Jeanne, and petite Geneviève. Ada banyak hal lagi tentang isi novel ini yang dibahas dalam webnya Tracy, silakan bagi yang berminat untuk menelusurinya di sini. Ini mungkin yang menarik, Tracy memberikan informasi yang tak tertulis di bukunya, namun menyediakannya di web pribadi.
Tracy dengan apik memberikan pengetahuan tentang abad pertengahan. Selain itu ia menceritakan suasana penenunan permadani kepada pembaca. Sebagai penulis kreatif ia memadukan pengetahuan lukisan, penenunan, kehidupan bangsawan, kehidupan biara. Ia memang serius dalam penulisan setiap novelnya. Untuk novel ini, ia membaca banyak buku serta mengunjungi museum dan tempat pembuatan permadani untuk mendapat feel pekerjaan itu. Mungkin karena itu juga cerita pada bagian melukis dan menenun, Tracy menuliskannya dengan mendetil. Bagi kita yang belum pernah punya pengalaman visual sebelumnya, tentunya akan sulit berimajinasi.
Terjemahan novel ini juga banyak mempertahankan istilah-istilah dalam Bahasa Prancis. Mungkin lebih baik jika ada keterangan singkat tentang apa maksud/arti istilah-istilah seperti n'est-ce pas?, millefleur. Atau itu mungkin salah satu siasat supaya pembaca harus mencari sendiri? Hmmm...boleh jadi :)
Tracy Chevalier lahir tahun 1962 and besar di Washington, DC. Ia memeroleh gelar Bachelor (in English) dari Oberlin College, Ohio. Setelah itu ia memeroleh gelar Master of Art di bidang creative writing dari the University of East Anglia, Norwich, England. Ia terkenal sebagai penulis novel fiksi sejarah. Novelnya antara lain Remarkable Creatures (2009), Burning Bright (2007), The Lady and the Unicorn (2003), Falling Angels (2001), Girl With a Pearl Earring (1999), dan The Virgin Blue (1997).
Pekerjaan utamanya ialah menulis dan menjadi mengurus rumah tangga. Ia sangat menikmati profesi sebagai penulis. Ia mengatakan: Luckily writing is a flexible profession – I decide my schedule, and I can take as long as I need – for the most part.
Selain gelar master di bidang kepenulisan dan telah menulis novel-novel best seller, ia memberikan tips menulis pada penulis pemula:
* Don’t write about what you know – write about what you’re interested in.
* Don’t write about yourself – you aren’t as interesting as you think! There’s a whole world out there to explore.
* Be very critical – your writing can always be improved. Revise, then revise again, and again.
@hws08062011
April 5, 2020
Δεν θα το έλεγα καλό μυθιστόρημα αλλά ούτε κακό, ήταν απλά μια ευχάριστη ανάγνωση. Θυμάμαι ότι το κοριτσι με το σκουλαρίκι της ίδιας με είχε ενθουσιασει πολύ όταν το είχα διαβάσει στα 17 μου. Οι χαρακτήρες μου ήταν αδιάφοροι αν και μου κράτησαν καλή παρέα και ουσιαστικά δεν έγινε και τίποτα το σπουδαίο, έτσι ώστε να πω πως μου δημιούργησε έντονα συναισθήματα. Επίσης, έχει κ ένα love story που το βρίσκω ανάρμοστο. Θα του βάλω 3 αστεράκια, μόνο κ μόνο γιατί το διάβασα σε δύο μέρες απο την αρχή έως το τελος χωρίς να παραλείψω κάποια σελίδα.
December 22, 2020
This was a reread from many years ago- apart from remembering it was about weavers I didn’t remember much else. I listened to this on audible this time and the narrator was fantastic with a wide range of great voices. It was a 5 star read before and now again with 5 stars for the narrator too.
The story is set both in Paris and Brussels where the weaving takes place. The artist commissioned is a regular lothario and sees himself as the rampant unicorn. In part we learn about his love life but what is more interesting and fascinating even is learning about the process of creating a beautiful panel of tapestry- the man who supplies blue dye (woad) stinks of piss used in its creation; the length of time it took to make a tapestry (years), the particular function of the cartoonist who must translate the art into something the weavers can understand.
A great story for historical fiction lovers.
The story is set both in Paris and Brussels where the weaving takes place. The artist commissioned is a regular lothario and sees himself as the rampant unicorn. In part we learn about his love life but what is more interesting and fascinating even is learning about the process of creating a beautiful panel of tapestry- the man who supplies blue dye (woad) stinks of piss used in its creation; the length of time it took to make a tapestry (years), the particular function of the cartoonist who must translate the art into something the weavers can understand.
A great story for historical fiction lovers.
August 21, 2021
Ar geriau nei Mergina? Ne, nepasakyčiau. Bet irgi neblogai. Gražus, plaukiantis vertimas ir dar gražesnis autorės tekstas. Ne taip kaip Merginoje, čia man sunkiau patikėti istorinių reikalų autentiškumu - atrodo, kad mažiau gylio, istorinių žinių svorio, detalių - gi purvas, tamsa ir žmogaus niekingumas nėra viskas, kuo laikmetis išsiskiria? Visgi, skaitosi greitai ir įtraukia, gal tik retas kuris veikėjas iki galo atrodo patrauklus, tačiau visi savaip įsimintini - neabejotinas Chevalier tekstų privalumas. Susitaikyti su čia aprašomo amžiaus aktualijomis baisiai sunku, jei ne neįmanoma - tose pačiose tarpuvartėse chebra ir mylisi, ir mušasi, ir, nevyniokim, kakoja. Daug purvo, bet vat meilės menui, ne taip kaip Merginoje, mažokai - nebent pinigų skaičiavimą vadintume meile. Gal todėl ir gobelenų grožis nublanksta - jų kaina visapusiškai per didelė. Per skaudi.
Kad skaičiau nesigailiu, bet ne taip kaip Merginos, lentynoje nebepasilikčiau - per dažnai jaučiausi plaukianti paviršiumi: meno, santykių, skausmo. Ir moterų veikėjams man čia pritrūko atspalvių bei sluoksnių - žinant, kad Chevalier gali geriau, knyga mano akyse šiaip arčiau 3.5 gula, nei kad stipraus 4.
Kad skaičiau nesigailiu, bet ne taip kaip Merginos, lentynoje nebepasilikčiau - per dažnai jaučiausi plaukianti paviršiumi: meno, santykių, skausmo. Ir moterų veikėjams man čia pritrūko atspalvių bei sluoksnių - žinant, kad Chevalier gali geriau, knyga mano akyse šiaip arčiau 3.5 gula, nei kad stipraus 4.
February 6, 2018
3.5 stars. I really liked the description of the weaving process of the Flemish tapestries, starting with the drawings, the daily lives of artisans and nobles, and to imagine life in Brussels at that time. I kept this book so I could read it while visiting the city and it was great to visit some of the places described in it. This being said, I would have liked the book to have more historical information and less romance, which at times even seemed a bit cheesy...
February 13, 2018
Prvo, ali ne i zadnje druženje sa Tracy :)
March 13, 2018
I've always wondered about the intricate process of creating a tapestry and in this book I felt like the author had taken me by the hand and patiently brought the creation of six tapestries to life for me, drawing me into the world of fifteen's century Paris and Brussels. Artists, cartoonists, dyers, weavers, seamstresses and financiers were all involved in the creation, months of preparations and planning were followed by months of weaving. In among this interesting setting, we're introduced to a myriad of characters brought together for the realization of these pieces of art. I had to laugh out loud when I came across this paragraph : 'He is a boaster that Paris artist. I have not been to Paris ... but I've met enough Paris men to know that I wouldn't like it there. They are too sure of their ways. Always they know best - they have the best wine, the best shoes, the best cloth, the best brushes, the best ways of making paint. Their women bear more children, their hens more eggs ... their churches are taller, their ships faster, their roads smoother.' The rivalry between Paris and Brussels was still apparent when I grew up in the Belgian capital so reading those lines made me shake my head in disbelief that these competitive streaks started sometime in the past, hundreds of years ago. But the legacy of tapestries bind them together, their contributions equal and the result often stunning and impressive.
April 8, 2023
This novel provides a fictionalized history of the Unicorn tapestries, real works of art that are now on display in the Musée de Cluny. Very little is known of their creation and Tracy Chevalier has imagined the story of why and how they were made. They were commissioned by the Le Viste family around the year 1500. Chevalier does an admirable job of crafting a convincing historical fiction of the commission, design, cartooning, weaving, and hanging. The story is told by a variety of voices connected with the project.
Jean Le Viste commissions Nicholas des Innocents, a portrait artist, to design tapestries for his ballroom. At first, he asks for battle scenes, but Nicholas talks him into different subject matter based upon a conversation with Jean’s wife. Nicholas is a womanizer, and this story gets rather bawdy in describing his amorous pursuits. Nicholas attempts to seduce Le Viste’s daughter, and, later, the blind daughter of the Brussels tapestry weaver.
The writing is descriptive and fits with the historical time period. It is educational in terms of the steps required to produce a tapestry. Nicholas is a talented rogue, and it is easy to dislike him (as I am sure the author intends). Recommended to those who enjoy historical fiction about real works of art. I can also recommend Chevalier’s Remarkable Creatures and The Girl with the Pearl Earring.
Jean Le Viste commissions Nicholas des Innocents, a portrait artist, to design tapestries for his ballroom. At first, he asks for battle scenes, but Nicholas talks him into different subject matter based upon a conversation with Jean’s wife. Nicholas is a womanizer, and this story gets rather bawdy in describing his amorous pursuits. Nicholas attempts to seduce Le Viste’s daughter, and, later, the blind daughter of the Brussels tapestry weaver.
The writing is descriptive and fits with the historical time period. It is educational in terms of the steps required to produce a tapestry. Nicholas is a talented rogue, and it is easy to dislike him (as I am sure the author intends). Recommended to those who enjoy historical fiction about real works of art. I can also recommend Chevalier’s Remarkable Creatures and The Girl with the Pearl Earring.
August 3, 2025
What the fuck did I just read ? Did Tracy Chevalier really write The Girl with a Pearl Earring ? Was The Girl with a Pearl Earring actually a good book or was I just deluding myself? (actually lead me to reread it to check if I hadn’t gone crazy…)
As you can see, The Lady and the Unicorn was so tremendously horrible it fully sent me spiralling. I finished the whole book in a day, not because it was good but because I just needed it to be over so I could run straight to Goodreads and bash it like it deserves to be bashed. Seriously, no wonder the publisher was giving this one out for free because no one sane should ever pay money to experience the actual trauma that is reading this book.
First, this horrid nonsense needs several trigger warnings yet it doesn’t have any ? You can’t just write about a grown man leeching on every women he meets and trying to have sex with a 14 years old, let alone talk about her in ways so graphically disgusting they rival FUCKING LOLITA, and not put a trigger warning anywhere. I swear to god if he started calling her anything akin to « fire of my loins » I would have needed to burn sage to cleanse my home from the filth contained within these pages… I don’t give a flying fuck that this is set in the medieval times, it certainly wasn’t published in the 15th century so as far as I’m concerned it should include trigger warnings for its extremely creepy sexual content, allusions to depression and self harm, as well as the fact it treats a relationship between an obvious child and a full grown man as a legitimate love story - I got into this book thinking I’d learn about tapestries, not fucking grooming tips and tricks!!! It boils my blood just thinking about it.
Second, The Lady and the Unicorn might be the worst written book I have ever read. Seriously. I couldn’t keep count of the number of times the narrator went “*Name of a character* did something. *still name of the same character* was like this”. Did Tracy Chevalier unlearn what pronouns were after writing The Girl with a Pearl Earring ?
Synonyms? I hardly know her. No one calls anyone anything besides their names or truly ✨ tasteful ✨ nicknames, not only in dialog but in the narration as well - was this an attempt at emulating Medieval speech patterns or something that got lost in translation? Honestly I have no idea, but The Lady and the Unicorn probably has some of the blandest, beigest, most pedantic writing I have ever had the displeasure of laying my eyes on; I’ve read books meant for children with infinitely better prose. I reckon half of the page count is just information dump delivered in the absolute most uncreative and uninspired manner an author could ever muster. It baffles me a book can actually be this horribly written without having Onision’s name on the cover… I might actually need to read Stones to Abigail to find a novel worst than this one. I’d much rather reread The Selection (bad) than be put through this depressing water-flavoured nothing experience.
Third, I hated every single character besides the blind girl whose’s name I have forgotten. I won’t even touch on the writing of her disability because I don’t want to talk out of turn, but what I can certainly talk about is the misogyny imbued in every aspect of this novel. The main character, the absolute dirtbag behind the tapestry, is the grossest little manipulative shit I have ever had the misfortune of reading about. Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE manipulative characters - I could lovingly praise the Darkling or Amy Dunn for days on end. I also think there’s a merit and a lot of potential in writing a truly disgustingly sexist character who has about as much empathy as Patrick Bateman. Everything comes down to framing and writing skills, things Chevalier is clearly struggling with here. While I believe Nicolas is supposed to have grown through the story from womanising nightmare of a human being into someone who can really see the individual qualities of the women around him and empathise with the pain his oppressively patriarchal society is causing them, it doesn’t not feel subtle and is rather unconvincing. While his perception of women may have SLIGHTLY progressed through the novel, it is still way too little to even approach something worthy of being considered a character arc; he stills behaves in a sleazy and dishonest manner towards women, still desires mostly sex from them and still doesn’t mind exploiting the power he possesses to secure sexual fulfilment. He pays prostitutes for sex from beginning to the end, sees no issues in trying to pursue a relationship with a clueless 14 years old and takes advantage of the desperation of a disabled girl to have sex with her. Worst, while he’s been pestering her for sex and harassing her since he’s met her, him having sex with her so she doesn’t end up married to another somehow worst prick is framed as an almost heroic act of kindness. Even worst yet, while she’s shown nothing but distastes towards him until this point (rightfully so), the poor thing suddenly has a change of heart and is now very much into him as well as more than willing to continue their “love affair” for an extended period of time. All the women in this novel end up different level of miserable, which worked very well in The girl with the pearl earring but absolutely rubs me the wrong way here considering there’s so many female POV characters and not even one gets a happy ending.
Honestly, this book reads a lot like Lolita, just without the beautiful imaged prose and the reassurance it is written from the point of view of a severely delusional unreliable narrator. Instead of reading about a clueless young girl suffering through men’s whims and burning her wings like Icarus flying too close to the sun, it feels as though you are listening to the apologist tale of the scumbags who took advantage of said young girl and the person who’s written them down, some sort of metaphorical LeFou, truly believes they are indeed great men who couldn’t help but be seduced by the underage girls. Yikes.
As you can see, The Lady and the Unicorn was so tremendously horrible it fully sent me spiralling. I finished the whole book in a day, not because it was good but because I just needed it to be over so I could run straight to Goodreads and bash it like it deserves to be bashed. Seriously, no wonder the publisher was giving this one out for free because no one sane should ever pay money to experience the actual trauma that is reading this book.
First, this horrid nonsense needs several trigger warnings yet it doesn’t have any ? You can’t just write about a grown man leeching on every women he meets and trying to have sex with a 14 years old, let alone talk about her in ways so graphically disgusting they rival FUCKING LOLITA, and not put a trigger warning anywhere. I swear to god if he started calling her anything akin to « fire of my loins » I would have needed to burn sage to cleanse my home from the filth contained within these pages… I don’t give a flying fuck that this is set in the medieval times, it certainly wasn’t published in the 15th century so as far as I’m concerned it should include trigger warnings for its extremely creepy sexual content, allusions to depression and self harm, as well as the fact it treats a relationship between an obvious child and a full grown man as a legitimate love story - I got into this book thinking I’d learn about tapestries, not fucking grooming tips and tricks!!! It boils my blood just thinking about it.
Second, The Lady and the Unicorn might be the worst written book I have ever read. Seriously. I couldn’t keep count of the number of times the narrator went “*Name of a character* did something. *still name of the same character* was like this”. Did Tracy Chevalier unlearn what pronouns were after writing The Girl with a Pearl Earring ?
Synonyms? I hardly know her. No one calls anyone anything besides their names or truly ✨ tasteful ✨ nicknames, not only in dialog but in the narration as well - was this an attempt at emulating Medieval speech patterns or something that got lost in translation? Honestly I have no idea, but The Lady and the Unicorn probably has some of the blandest, beigest, most pedantic writing I have ever had the displeasure of laying my eyes on; I’ve read books meant for children with infinitely better prose. I reckon half of the page count is just information dump delivered in the absolute most uncreative and uninspired manner an author could ever muster. It baffles me a book can actually be this horribly written without having Onision’s name on the cover… I might actually need to read Stones to Abigail to find a novel worst than this one. I’d much rather reread The Selection (bad) than be put through this depressing water-flavoured nothing experience.
Third, I hated every single character besides the blind girl whose’s name I have forgotten. I won’t even touch on the writing of her disability because I don’t want to talk out of turn, but what I can certainly talk about is the misogyny imbued in every aspect of this novel. The main character, the absolute dirtbag behind the tapestry, is the grossest little manipulative shit I have ever had the misfortune of reading about. Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE manipulative characters - I could lovingly praise the Darkling or Amy Dunn for days on end. I also think there’s a merit and a lot of potential in writing a truly disgustingly sexist character who has about as much empathy as Patrick Bateman. Everything comes down to framing and writing skills, things Chevalier is clearly struggling with here. While I believe Nicolas is supposed to have grown through the story from womanising nightmare of a human being into someone who can really see the individual qualities of the women around him and empathise with the pain his oppressively patriarchal society is causing them, it doesn’t not feel subtle and is rather unconvincing. While his perception of women may have SLIGHTLY progressed through the novel, it is still way too little to even approach something worthy of being considered a character arc; he stills behaves in a sleazy and dishonest manner towards women, still desires mostly sex from them and still doesn’t mind exploiting the power he possesses to secure sexual fulfilment. He pays prostitutes for sex from beginning to the end, sees no issues in trying to pursue a relationship with a clueless 14 years old and takes advantage of the desperation of a disabled girl to have sex with her. Worst, while he’s been pestering her for sex and harassing her since he’s met her, him having sex with her so she doesn’t end up married to another somehow worst prick is framed as an almost heroic act of kindness. Even worst yet, while she’s shown nothing but distastes towards him until this point (rightfully so), the poor thing suddenly has a change of heart and is now very much into him as well as more than willing to continue their “love affair” for an extended period of time. All the women in this novel end up different level of miserable, which worked very well in The girl with the pearl earring but absolutely rubs me the wrong way here considering there’s so many female POV characters and not even one gets a happy ending.
Honestly, this book reads a lot like Lolita, just without the beautiful imaged prose and the reassurance it is written from the point of view of a severely delusional unreliable narrator. Instead of reading about a clueless young girl suffering through men’s whims and burning her wings like Icarus flying too close to the sun, it feels as though you are listening to the apologist tale of the scumbags who took advantage of said young girl and the person who’s written them down, some sort of metaphorical LeFou, truly believes they are indeed great men who couldn’t help but be seduced by the underage girls. Yikes.
December 30, 2023
I have read a couple of other novels by Tracy Chevalier and enjoyed them. The concept underlying The Lady and the Unicorn is like my previous experience. At its center is the creation of a piece of art, a tapestry in this case. The time is 1490 and the artist, Nicolas des Innocents, is asked by a French nobleman, Jean Le Viste, to create a set of six tapestries with which Jean Le Viste can decorate his Grande Salle or great room for his oldest daughter’s betrothal. Jean Le Viste wants a battle scene, but his wife, Genevieve de Nanterre, does not; she persuades Nicolas des Innocents to convince her husband otherwise.
The most enjoyable part of the novel was learning about the process by which tapestries are made. The portrayal of medieval life and commerce was also enlightening. However, I did not enjoy this novel as much as the other two that I have read by Chevalier, especially Remarkable Creatures. Chevalier did not have as much known history to work with in this case and had to create significantly more story with which to surround the creation of the artwork. Much of the story that was added can be described as bawdy romance, which I found distracting. Despite these caveats, it is an entertaining tale and provides some insight into the medieval world. The tapestries are widely regarded as an excellent example of Medieval art and crafts; they are on display today in the Musee de Cluny.
The most enjoyable part of the novel was learning about the process by which tapestries are made. The portrayal of medieval life and commerce was also enlightening. However, I did not enjoy this novel as much as the other two that I have read by Chevalier, especially Remarkable Creatures. Chevalier did not have as much known history to work with in this case and had to create significantly more story with which to surround the creation of the artwork. Much of the story that was added can be described as bawdy romance, which I found distracting. Despite these caveats, it is an entertaining tale and provides some insight into the medieval world. The tapestries are widely regarded as an excellent example of Medieval art and crafts; they are on display today in the Musee de Cluny.
November 23, 2010
The story of The Lady and the Unicorn is quite interesting: according to the author they were rediscovered by Prosper Merimee in 1841 and he found them in poor condition. Georges Sand became their champion, writing about them in articles, novels and her journal. In 1992 the French government bought the tapestries for the Musee de Cluny in Paris - where they still hang, restored and in a specially appointed room.
I didn't enjoy this book as much as The Girl with a Pearl Earring. And certainly Chrissie wont like this kind of book also.
The "Lady and the Unicorn" tapestry at the Cluny Museum in Paris
I didn't enjoy this book as much as The Girl with a Pearl Earring. And certainly Chrissie wont like this kind of book also.
The "Lady and the Unicorn" tapestry at the Cluny Museum in Paris
June 26, 2024
I'm happy this was a short book, because I didn't enjoy it at all.
It was just obscene and no idea why this is even historical fiction when there's barely any of what it was supposed to be about.
I thought it was going to be more about the tapestry but it was just about strange, inadequate characters.
It was just obscene and no idea why this is even historical fiction when there's barely any of what it was supposed to be about.
I thought it was going to be more about the tapestry but it was just about strange, inadequate characters.
Read
August 26, 2025There’s some bizarre things that Nicholas des Innocents is discussing about menstrual cycles and how he’s a unicorn 🦄 who will make women “pure” again by engaging in sexual activities with them?!!! What the actual heck?!!! DNF!!!
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,517 reviews